Britain gives hope to families of Sri Lanka’s ‘disappeared’

The UK is pushing for action from the UN Human Rights council as Sri Lanka’s president seeks to quash investigations into alleged war crimes

It was almost midnight when the bark of the street dogs caused Aarvi Radhakrishnan* to wake with a jolt, alerting her to the four men in military combats outside.

Cradling guns over their shoulders, they entered Mrs Radhakrishnan’s home through an open window before inexplicably dragging away her terrified husband, Raghunandan*, in front of their three children and into the dark night.

“They pushed me to the ground and threatened to shoot me. They dragged my husband through our town and I tried to follow them, shouting for our neighbours but they were too afraid to help,” said Mrs Radhakrishnan, 45.

The long search for Raghunandan and 20,000 other Sri Lankans who remain missing after the country’s barbaric 26-year civil war has completely halted after the election of Gotabaya Rajapaksa, who is personally accused of an array of war crimes during the conflict, as President in 2019.

But, there may now be renewed hope for Mrs Radhakrishnan, after a United Kingdom-led council at the United Nations High Commission for Human Rights (OHCHR) proposed a new landmark resolution in February to investigate those responsible for atrocities.

The abduction of her fisherman husband in June 2008 was the fifth disappearance in the town that year, as the largely Sinhalese Sri Lankan Army accused townspeople of selling goods to the Tamil Tiger (LTTE) insurgents.

“Raghunandan never got involved in anything and therefore we had no reason to think he would be abducted, or else we would have sent him far away from our town,” bemoans Mrs Radhakrishnan.

Gotabaya Rajapaksa served as Defence Secretary during the last four years of the conflict – appointed by his brother Mahinda, who was then President – and is accused of overseeing some of the most horrific war crimes.

The rampaging, victorious Sri Lankan Army allegedly murdered up to 40,000 Tamil civilians, as graphically documented in Channel 4’s award-winning “Sri Lanka’s Killing Fields”, during the final few months of the conflict in 2009.

To the horror of Sri Lanka’s minorities, Gotabaya was elected as President himself in 2019, as the majority Sinhalese electorate prioritised security after the Easter Sunday suicide bombings that killed 269 people.

Gotabaya wasted no time in withdrawing Sri Lanka from an OHCHR resolution, agreed by the previous regime in 2015, that promised to establish a domestic mechanism to prosecute those who carried out atrocities.

He described the UN agreement as a “historic betrayal” and promised to protect the nation’s “war heroes” from prosecution, pardoning Sunil Ratnayake a sergeant convicted of the wartime killing of eight Tamil civilians, including children.

At least 28 former military personnel were then appointed to key government posts and the Office of Missing Persons, set up in 2017 to log disappearances, has been staffed with Gotabaya’s allies.

“Since the new government was elected, the few cases where police investigations had gone forward to identify and prosecute perpetrators are being stalled,” explains Meenakshi Ganguly, South Asia Director at Human Rights Watch.

“One senior police officer who led these investigations had to flee the country, while another was arrested, allegedly in a politically motivated case.”

Mrs Radhakrishnan had already searched fruitlessly for her husband for years, arranging meetings with local police officers, human rights activists, and even her local priest. But, now, she says any remaining channels of investigation are being exhausted.

“During the previous government we could demonstrate, protest and speak to the authorities about our situation but now there would be a huge drama,” said Mrs Radhakrishnan.

In particular, members of the Sri Lankan civil society which previously assisted families of the disappeared have suddenly found themselves under intense scrutiny from Gotabaya’s regime.

In January, more than 40 NGOs reported to the UN that they were receiving harassment from intelligence officials, including regular visits to their homes, anonymous threats, and having their movements tracked.

“Every minute I do this job, I think that there is no real assurance for my life. When I go out, I can’t assure my family whether I will return home, this is how much fear we have these days,” one Sri Lankan activist told the Daily Telegraph.

In 2011, Mrs Radhakrishnan and 200 women formed an activist group to search for their missing relatives but this has ceased to operate following Gotabaya’s election after members were put under surveillance and their spokesperson threatened with arrest.

A human rights lawyer assisting family members of the disappeared said not one abduction case had been resolved since Gotabaya’s election, with judges replaced with regime allies.

“Lawyers now face a host of issues including securing the safety and security of their clients, enduring and mitigating surveillance and harassment from the state and fellow colleagues who accuse us of working for NGOs, and lastly, it is very hard to access the information we need for cases,” said the human rights lawyer.

Infuriated by Gotabaya’s brazen attempts to protect soldiers under his command during the civil war, the OHCHR is expected to pass a landmark resolution on March 22 to begin the collection of evidence related to atrocities committed in Sri Lanka.

“The victims from all communities of Sri Lanka’s brutal civil war are a decade later still awaiting justice for loved ones murdered or missing, and dealing with the repercussions of violence and conflict,” said Lord Ahmad, the Minister of State for South Asia and the Commonwealth.

“That is why the UK is seeking a new resolution at the UN Human Rights Council to call on Sri Lanka to hold perpetrators of human rights violations to account, improve human rights and deliver justice for the war’s victims.”

If the Sri Lankan Government still then refuses to investigate war crimes itself, the UN could establish an international, unilateral mechanism to assist in bringing the perpetrators to justice, as in the aftermath of the Syrian conflict.

“Before this announcement, various politicians had promised to find my husband but it had been unbearably difficult, I had lost hope,” said Mrs Radhakrishnan, through tears.

“I need to know whether he is alive or not, I just need an answer, I have been through unbearable difficulties.”

*Some names have been changed to protect the identity of interviewees

Source:Telegraph.co.uk

Posted in Uncategorized

High Court overturns decision to fine Sri Lankan soldier for throat-cutting gesture

THE High Court has ruled in favour of a senior Sri Lankan military officer who was found guilty of public order offences for making slit-throat gestures at protesters in London.

Brigadier Priyanka Fernando was convicted in 2019 and ordered to pay more than £4,000 in compensation and costs after he was filmed making threatening gestures towards Tamil protesters outside the Sri Lankan high commission in 2018.

Three of the protesters, who brought the case, said that the actions of the then military attache had caused them alarm, harassment and distress.

The senior district judge at Westminster magistrates’ court also found that Brig Fernando’s actions were not protected by diplomatic immunity because they did not form part of his duties.

But the High Court overturned the decision today following an appeal by the Sri Lankan soldier, ruling that his actions were covered by diplomatic immunity.

Handing down the court’s decision, Sir Julian Flaux and Mrs Justice McGowan ruled: “We consider that the acts in question in the present case were ones which were performed by the appellant in the exercise of his functions as a member of the mission and thus qua diplomat.

“They did not somehow lose that quality and become acts performed in a personal capacity merely because they were criminal.”

Peter Carter QC, acting for Majuran Sathananthan, one of the Tamil protesters who brought the orginal case, had argued that Brig Fernando’s actions were performed in a personal capacity.

“We are extremely disappointed by this decision,” said solicitor Paul Heron, of the Public Interest Law Centre, who represented the three protesters.

“We would not expect a diplomat to be carrying out his official duties by threatening peaceful protesters.

“We will be reviewing the case in detail, consulting with our client and considering appeal options.”

Source:https:morningstaronline.co.uk

Rupee dip triggers political standoff, policy response

Government and main Opposition politicians traded points over rupee depreciation yesterday, in the backdrop of the Central Bank suspending the requirement for licensed banks to sell 10% of worker remittances and 50% of export earnings to the monetary authority and stopping the purchase of Sri Lanka Development Bonds as part of a multi-pronged effort to stabilise the currency.

Issuing two circulars on Wednesday, the Central Bank suspended the requirement imposed last month making it mandatory for licensed commercial banks to sell 10% of converted worker remittances to the monetary authority. It did the same for the regulation requiring 50% of export earnings to be sold to the Central Bank.

Both suspensions will be implemented until further notice. On Thursday, an additional circular informed licensed commercial banks and National Savings Bank to suspend the purchase of Sri Lanka International Sovereign Bonds with effect from 23 March until 9 April.

“The Central Bank of Sri Lanka with a view to easing pressure on the exchange rate and considering the substantial amount of possible/potential outflow of foreign exchange by banks and its impact on banks’ risk management, licensed commercial banks and National Savings Bank are hereby informed to suspend the purchase of Sri Lanka International Sovereign Bonds with effect from 23 March 2021 until 09 April 2021,” a directive issued by the Governor of the Central Bank said.

The Central Bank had earlier said the rupee recorded a depreciation of 4.9% against the dollar till 10 March. But that was exacerbated this week after the rupee closed at Rs. 202/203 to the dollar in the one-week forward market on Wednesday. It managed to do slightly better yesterday closing at 198.50/199 levels, according to dealers. The bond yields remained unchanged.

Weighing in on the depreciation issue yesterday, State Minister for Money, Capital Markets and State Enterprise Reforms Ajith Nivard Cabraal was confident fresh forex flows are around the corner and backed Government policies for creating the right environment to attract them.

“The right #policies are now in place for non-debt #forex inflows. It’s only a matter of time before the #Rupee appreciation process starts. #Businesses and #industries must prepare for that transformation. @CBSL #SriLanka #debt #GOSL #economicrecoveryplan,” the State Minister tweeted.

However, there was a swift rebuttal from Samagi Jana Balawegaya (SJB) and former State Minister of Finance Eran Wickramaratne, who faulted the Government for triggering depreciation by increasing market liquidity levels. He also pointed out that market sentiment was low due to fast shrinking reserves, which the Government had so far failed to boost and warned that unless more clarity is provided on debt sustainability, the rupee could continue its decline. Sri Lanka’s reserves reached $ 4.5 billion in February.

Wickramaratne criticised the Government for pushing the Central Bank to purchase large amounts of Government Securities to finance a high Budget deficit, resulting in the release of Rs. 700 billion into the market. He argued that this high a level of liquidity was causing the rupee to depreciate. The Central Bank has maintained a contradictory stance, pointing out that due to import restrictions, especially on vehicles, demand is being kept subdued and liquidity was not driving depletion of reserves.

“There is a big problem with policy making and management of the economy,” Wickramaratne told reporters at a press conference. “The continuation of the Government’s current fiscal policy will lead to a greater crisis. Printing money is one thing. But if debt servicing is not done properly, it will be disastrous for Sri Lanka.

“The 17 March treasury bond auction is a good example. There wasn’t a demand for Treasury Bills even with a three-month maturity. This is the state of affairs.”

Analysts who spoke to the Daily FT acknowledged pinning down the exact reason for rupee depreciation was tricky but conceded that market sentiment could be under additional pressure due to two large debt repayments in May and July. On 1 May the Central Bank will have to settle an estimated $ 670 million in Sri Lanka Development Bonds, about half what is due for the year. This will be closely followed by a $ 1 billion bond repayment in mid-July.

“With limited reserves investors are concerned about how these repayments will be met. This is a key question asked by many foreign investors who call us. Exports also tend to be lower in April due to New Year holidays, and imports tend to increase ahead of the festival period, sometimes creating currency pressures. But these dynamics may have changed due to the pandemic,” opined ICRA Lanka Head of Research and Business Development Lalinda Sugathadasa.

“It is hard to give a specific reason, but sentiment definitely plays a huge role.”

Analysts also agreed that a significant inflow of forex is needed to reverse depreciation but suggested that the recent $ 1.5 billion swap with China was unlikely to meet this requirement as it was a local currency facility and not a dollar one.

“Since the swap is in Yuan the Government can likely only draw down to pay import bills. This is useful since China is one of our biggest import destinations with Sri Lanka regularly importing about $ 3.5-4 billion in goods. But it will not top up reserves and that is what Sri Lanka really needs,” a well-known economist told Daily FT on conditions of anonymity.

So far, the Central Bank’s active intervention in the domestic foreign exchange market through supply of foreign exchange and sell/buy swaps with local commercial banks has contributed to enhancing the foreign exchange liquidity in the market. The monetary authority supplied $ 72 million, on a net basis, to the domestic foreign exchange market in January.

Posted in Uncategorized

Sri Lanka accuses UK, Canada and Germany of concealing the truth

Sri Lanka has accused the United Kingdom, Canada and Germany of concealing the truth.

Foreign Minister Dinesh Gunawardena said that the allegations of human rights abuses in Sri Lanka by several countries including the UK, Canada and Germany is an action taken for political purposes, by concealing the truth.

A vote is scheduled to be held on 22 March 2021 on the allegations made by several countries against Sri Lanka, at the 46th session of the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) in Geneva.

Responding to a question raised by journalists at the Foreign Ministry in this regard today, the Minister pointed out that it is not the responsibility of an internationally recognized Human Rights Council to accuse or take a vote on the internal affairs of our country.

“Over the years, various allegations have been levelled against our country, alleging human rights abuses. We have been cautious about this. After our Government was elected, a Presidential Commission has been appointed to investigate human rights allegations,” he said.

The Minister said that funds have been allocated from the budget to activate the Office on Missing Persons.

He said that while the present Government was taking a number of such positive steps, it was not fair to ignore it and accuse Sri Lanka repeatedly in various manners at the Human Rights Council in Geneva.

“We try to defeat the false accusations levelled against us. Many friendly countries have joined hands with us in this. We hope that India too, will support us this time.”, said Minister Gunawardena.

The resolution on Sri Lanka on which a vote will be taken on 22 March 2021 was presented to the Council by the Core Group on Sri Lanka, which includes the United Kingdom, Canada and Germany.

State intelligence chief denies meeting Easter bomber in Malaysia

State Intelligence Service (SIS) Director, Major General Suresh Sallay has denied having links with the mastermind of the Easter Sunday attacks, Zahran Hashim.

He says he had not met Zahran Hashim in Malaysia, as claimed by an opposition Parliamentarian.

Major General Suresh Sallay has filed a complaint with the Criminal Investigations Department (CID) against Parliamentarian Nalin Bandara Jayamaha over the allegations.

Nalin Bandara had made the allegations at a media conference in Colombo.

The Parliamentarian had also claimed that Suresh Sallay had cleared the way for Zahran Hashim to travel to Malaysia, Indonesia and India before the 2019 Easter bombings in Sri Lanka.

Major General Suresh Sallay has called on the CID to investigate the claims made by the parliamentarian.

He says the claims are false and has an impact on his family life and the State Intelligence Service.

Posted in Uncategorized

South African Muslim bodies seek intervention over burqa ban in Sri Lanka

South African Muslim organisations have called on the country’s foreign minister to intervene in the proposed Sri Lankan ban on the burqa and closure of hundreds of Islamic schools.

This followed the announcement by Sri Lanka”s minister for public security, Sarath Weerasekera, during the weekend that his country would ban the traditional full-face covering worn by some Muslim women because it posed a threat to national security.

This was quickly followed by a statement from the Sri Lankan foreign ministry, which said a decision would only be taken on the proposal after consultations and further discussion.

The United Ulama Council of South Africa (UUCSA) has now asked South Africa’s Minister of International Relations and Co-operation Naledi Pandor to intervene in the matter.

UUCSA had earlier also called for such intervention when Sri Lanka decided that Muslims should also be cremated rather than buried, in defiance of Muslim requirements, which prohibit cremation. The cremation ruling was rescinded later.

“The UUCSA will once again appeal to the Department of International Relations and Co-operation to engage with its counterparts to stop state-sanctioned Islamophobia,” Yusuf Patel, the secretary-general of UUCSA, told the weekly Post.

“Muslims in Sri Lanka have become targets of virulent hate speech in mainstream and social media. The ban on the burqa and the closure of schools are meant to appease Sri Lanka’s Buddhist majority, who thrive on entrenching sectarian and religious divides through hate propaganda,” Patel said.

Adding its voice to the call for action against Sri Lanka, the South African Muslim Network (Samnet) said it was hypocritical of the Sri Lankan government to target Islamic schools.

“There are other religious groups who also have institutions that teach their religious teachings, but there has been no attempt to target those,” Samnet chairperson Dr Faisal Suliman told the weekly.

“Such moves like this, on the Muslim community, will likely give rise to radicalism, fundamentalism and underground movements, which will in fact be a greater source of insecurity than working with religious schools, interacting with them and looking at the syllabi taught. By doing this, they will be ensuring that there are standards and uniformity of the teachings.”

Suliman said Samnet would express its concerns to both the local foreign ministry as well as the Sri Lankan embassy in South Africa. (PTI)

Posted in Uncategorized

Harvard Law Student Coordinates Open Letter to United Nations Calling for Human Rights Accountability in Sri Lanka

Sondra R. P. Anton, a second-year student at Harvard Law School, has coordinated an open letter to the United Nations calling on the Human Rights Council to create a new resolution to promote accountability for human rights violations in Sri Lanka.

The open letter, which was sent in February, argues that “prospects for domestic justice and accountability efforts in Sri Lanka have dimmed entirely” since the election of Gotabaya Rajapaksa to the Sri Lankan presidency in November 2019.

The letter was signed by 22 organizations, including Harvard Law School’s International Human Rights Clinic, the Center for Justice and Accountability, Human Rights Watch, and the World Organization Against Torture.

Rajapaksa formerly served as secretary to the ministry of defense in the government led by his brother, former president Mahinda Rajapaksa, from 2005 to 2015. During this period, many critics of the Sri Lankan government disappeared or were tortured or murdered.

Sri Lanka’s 26-year-long civil war ended in May 2009 with the deaths of tens of thousands of Tamil civilians in the final months alone, many of them caused by government shelling. The UN and other human rights groups have called for inquiries into alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by Gotabaya Rajapaksa during this period.

Rajapaksa’s election to the presidency has ignited fears about the regression of human rights in Sri Lanka. In February 2020, the new administration announced its withdrawal from a landmark resolution that promoted human rights — a move the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights said demonstrated the Sri Lankan government’s “inability and unwillingness” to be held accountable for human rights violations.

Anton, who worked closely with the Law School’s International Human Rights Clinic during the letter-writing process, said this is “a really pivotal time” for Sri Lanka, and that the country is “one of the world’s biggest failures” in recent history.

“There’s this assumption that with the end of war comes peace, and that could not be further from the truth in Sri Lanka,” Anton said.

Tyler Giannini, a co-director of the Law School’s International Human Rights Clinic, said the letter “fits into a broader effort” to advocate for increased accountability in Sri Lanka, which has been perpetrating decades-long human rights abuses that culminated in the killing of tens of thousands of civilians in 2009.

“There’s really two reasons to do this letter,” Giannini said. “To make sure that accountability doesn’t go off the international agenda, and also to prevent future abuses, because there’s heightened risks of things deteriorating pretty badly in the future under this new regime.”

Thomas Becker, a signatory of the letter and a former clinician at the Law School, said he believes the growing wave of ethno-nationalism and persecution of minorities is influenced by a lack of accountability in places across the globe, including Sri Lanka.

“Impunity breeds impunity and justice breeds justice,” Becker said.

James L. Cavallaro ’84, the executive director of the University Network for Human Rights and former professor at the Law School, said it is “important that the UN re-engage” with efforts to hold Sri Lanka accountable.

“This is a space where a state like Sri Lanka is susceptible to international pressure, and it’s sort of fallen off the international radar screen,” Cavallaro said. “People have sort of moved on in a way that is not healthy, in a way that is not good for international law, for accountability.”

Nushin Sarkarati, senior staff attorney for the Center for Justice and Accountability, said it is “up to the member states now” to determine whether the world will hold Sri Lanka accountable.

“I hope they see that there is a groundswell of support for a new resolution,” Sarkarati said. “We want them to recognize that various NGOs are all supportive of this action moving forward and it’s up to them to now vote in favor.”

Anton wrote in an emailed statement that, as the daughter of an Ashkenazi Jewish mother and a Tamil father, she has witnessed how “the legacy of mass atrocity is passed down through generations” and the “indelible mark that impunity leaves on survivor communities.”

“Witnessing the pain and reliving of trauma that international inaction has brought on my own family and community has made this type of work even more frustrating at times,” Anton wrote. “But it also serves as a constant reminder that regardless of what happens this month in Geneva, and no matter how much time has passed, justice matters.”

—Staff writer Emmy M. Cho can be reached at emmy.cho@thecrimson.com.

India Vote Crucial for Sri Lanka at UNHRC But No Guarantee Yet

In his recent telephone conversation with the Sri Lankan President Gotabaya Rajapakasa, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that India “will not do any injustice to Sri Lanka,” says the Sri Lankan Foreign Secretary Adm.Prof.Jayanath Colombage.

He denied a report in the State-owned Daily News which quoted him as saying that India had assured that it would “support” Sri Lanka, and “protect the country’s sovereignty during the UNHRC sessions.”

The paper further quoted the Foreign Secretary as saying: “Being the super power they (India) are, Sri Lanka greatly appreciates their position.” The Foreign Secretary was speaking at the Third Digital Dialogue hosted by the Media Center for National Development, the paper said.

Clarifying the position, Colombage said that in his recent telephone conversation with the Sri Lankan President Gotabaya Rajapakasa, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the latter assured that India “will not do any injustice to Sri Lanka.”

India’s support is critical for Sri Lanka as the line-up against it in the 47-member UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) on the resolution on human rights violation is formidable. The hostile resolution calling for intervention and sanctions is likely to be carried.

While China, Pakistan and Russia are firm supporters of Sri Lanka, and the Sri Lankan Foreign Minister Dinesh Gunawardena claims that the Asian bloc will support his country, it appears that there is no such firm commitment on their part.

India has taken a stand that does not back Sri Lanka but is not supportive either. Its Representative, Indra Mani Pandey ,raised the issue of power devolution to the provinces under the 13th.Amendment and called for its implementation if there is to be ethnic reconciliation and national unity in Sri Lanka.

However, considering the precarious position Sri Lanka will be in, when the noose tightens in Geneva and the resolution comes for a vote, Sri Lankan opinion makers earnestly hope India would commit itself in its favor and lobby for it among the Afro-Asian countries even if only in the eleventh hour.

Conversations with Sri Lankans reveal that they would like India to uphold Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s “Neighborhood First” policy and come to Lanka’s aid when it needs it most. They recall that India has time and again reiterated its historical, cultural and religious ties with Sri Lanka and its commitment to the maintenance of its sovereignty and say that this is the time to demonstrate it.

It is also pointed out that Sri Lanka has cooperated with India on maritime security by becoming part of the India-inspired Indian Ocean Maritime Security architecture and setting up a Secretariat for it in Colombo.

Sri Lanka has offered the West Container Terminal project in Colombo port in lieu of the East Terminal. ECT could not be given to India or any foreign entity because of nationalist opposition. Sri Lanka suspended the solar power projects in the North which were earlier given to a Chinese company. Sri Lanka has also indicated that it will hold provincial council elections soon.

But politically aware Sri Lankans also realize that India has its concerns and grievances vis-à-vis Sri Lanka.

India has a long-standing commitment to the Tamil minority in the island, which has huge support among the Tamils of Tamil Nadu. In the past, India had had to intervene in Sri Lanka substantially because of domestic pressure from Tamil Nadu. And Tamil Nadu is going for State Assembly elections in April in which Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) is contesting as an ally of the ruling All Anna Dravida Munetra Kazhagam (AIADMK).

If the BJP gets a decent number of seats in the Assembly it will be a huge step forward for it as it will mean that Tamil Nadu is coming under the sway of Hindu nationalism, the BJP’s stock-in-trade.

Secondly, devolution of power to elected Provincial Councils in Sri Lanka is India’s brainchild. India is interested in its survival. The system stems from the July 1987 India-Sri Lanka Accord. Despite stiff opposition, the 13 th.Amendment (13A) creating elected provincial councils with a measure of autonomy, was passed by the Lankan parliament and has been in operation till recently. The councils have not had elections to enable the government to change the election law and go for a fresh delimitation of constituencies.

However the utterances of some key Lankan Ministers calling for the repeal of the 13A has raised an alarm in New Delhi. The Gotabaya Rajapaksa government is committed to bringing about a new constitution, where provincial autonomy might be pruned in favor of greater centralization, it is feared.

It is based on these apprehensions that Prime Minister Modi has repeatedly called for a full implementation of the 13A – which was reiterated by the Indian envoy in UNHRC.

Lankan President Gotabaya Rajapaksa has now said that Provincial Council elections will be held in June. But the legal decks have to be cleared first. The government has to decide whether it will go by the old electoral law and old delimitation of constituencies or have a new legal framework. According to reports efforts are being made to speed up the legal deck-clearing.

India has still not gotten over the disappointment over its removal from the project to build the East Container Terminal in Colombo port after signing an MOU on it in 2019. Piqued by this, the Indian government did not take the alternative offer of the West Container Terminal leaving it to be negotiated by the Adanis, a private Indian port operators’ company.

However, despite irritants and hiccups, India and Sri Lanka continue to engage each other in various fields. India was the principal foreign participant in the event related to the 70 th. Anniversary of the Sri Lankan Air Force. It sent its indigenous fighter aircraft Tejas and its aerobatic teams to give stunning displays for three days. India is also the only supplier of COVID-19 vaccines to date.

Recently, it gave LKR 22 million worth of teaching equipment to the Sri Lanka Maritime Naval Academy at Trincomalee and inaugurated the construction of 114 housing units for Catholic pilgrims who come to the historic Madhu Church in North Sri Lanka.

Source:THE CITIZEN

Revised quarantine guidelines issued for arrivals from overseas

Director-General of Health Services has issued revised COVID-19 quarantine guidelines for all incoming passengers and tourists arriving in Sri Lanka from overseas.

The guidelines noted that they should receive the approval to enter the country from the Foreign Affairs Ministry and other relevant authorities or from Sri Lanka Tourism, respectively.

All travelers should submit the filled Health Declaration Form to the staff of Airport Health Office at Health Counters at the arriving airport, it read further.

Key points in the guidelines for Sri Lankan citizens/dual citizens and foreign nationals:

• For passengers who have received the recommended doses of COVID-19 vaccine:

– They should arrive in the country after two weeks of completion of COVID-19 vaccination.

– Upon arrival, they should produce the original copy of the vaccination certificate together with a certified copy of English language translation if the certificate is not in English language, to the Airport Health Officer.

– They will be referred to a PCR test within 24 hours upon arrival (Day One) from a private or state sector laboratory approved by the Health Ministry.

– Once the test report is available, they will be released from the quarantine hotel or centre by issuing a discharge document mentioning the date of PCR sample collection and PCR test result.

– They should undergo repeat PCR on Day Seven after arrival to Sri Lanka from a private or state sector laboratory approved by the Health Ministry.

• For passengers who have not received the COVID vaccine or not completed the recommended doses of vaccination and arrive in Sri Lanka within less than two weeks of vaccination:

– If they are undergoing hotel quarantine (single or shared by family members), they will be referred to PCR testing on Day One and Day Seven.

– However, if they are under quarantine at a centre, they will be subjected to PCR testing on Day One and Day Ten.

– If both tests are negative, they will be released from the quarantine procedure, following the second PCR test.

Upon being discharged, all arrivals are required to arrange their own transport method to go to their respective residences from the quarantine hotel or centre.

Immediately upon arriving home, they should inform the area Medical Officer of Health (MOH) by telephone or email and produce a discharge document issued by the designated authority at the quarantine hotel or centre.

After informing the area MOH, the travellers, who have received both vaccine doses and obtained a negative PCR report on Day One of arrival, are not required to quarantine further.

For those who have not received the recommended vaccine doses, a balance home-quarantine period (out of 14 days) under the supervision of area MOH, is mandatory.

All PCR test results must be informed to the MOH attached to their respective residential area. If one of the PCR test results is positive, they should inform the MOH, and follow the treatment protocol of Health Ministry.

If febrile or display respiratory symptoms of COVID- 19 during the quarantine period, they should inform the relevant MOH.

In the meantime, separate guidelines issued for tourists arriving in the country have also been revised by the Director-General of Health Services.

Posted in Uncategorized

No more political parties based on racial & religious grounds: NEC

The National Election Commission (NEC) has drawn its attention to STOP the registration of political parties that are based on different racial and religious ideologies in the future, the Commission’s top official said.

The National Elections Commission (NEC) is currently holding discussions in this regard, Attorney-at-Law Nimal Punchihewa, the Chairman of the National Elections Commission told News 1st on Thursday (Mar. 18).

According to Punchihewa, the focus is also on changing the names of already registered political parties on the basis of race and religion.

Such political parties will be allocated a reasonable time period to change the existing party name nominated on the basis of various ethnicities and religions, the NEC Chairman pointed out.

The attention was drawn to this matter, taking into account the recommendations of several commission reports including the report of the Presidential Commission of Inquiry into the 2019 April 21 Attacks, pertaining to the registration of political parties on national and religious grounds, the Secretary of the National Elections Commission told News 1st.