How Independent are the Independent Commissions? By M.S.M.Ayub

With the postponement of postal voting on Tuesday, the local government elections seem to be hanging in the balance. The main hurdle to the smooth functioning of the Election Commission in respect of the LG polls is the government’s reluctance to release the funds allocated to the Commission by the national budget.

Irrespective of whether the government has the capacity to fund the LG elections which were postponed by one year in February last year, it has been hell-bent on preventing them from happening as scheduled. The reason is obvious and well-known. The popularity of both the ruling parties – the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP), the party that dominates the Parliament and the United National Party (UNP) led by President Ranil Wickremesinghe – is at a low ebb, owing to the current economic crisis.

The government leaders first attempted to postpone the election through legal means. President Ranil Wickremesinghe said he wants to downsize the LG bodies from over 8,000 to 4,000 members. Then, despite a Parliamentary Select Committee having presented a report on electoral reforms in June last year, they wanted to appoint another one in November for the same purpose. Thereafter, a private member’s Bill on the LG elections which provided for the inclusion of 25 per cent of youth members in local government bodies was presented by SLPP member Premnath C. Dolawatte. Another Bill (The Regulations of Election Expenditure Bill) was passed in Parliament last month.

In spite of the merit of these new laws, one has to infer the motive of presenting them at a time when an election has been announced. These things happened while the leaders of the government were arguing against holding the LG election at this juncture, citing economic hardships faced by the government and the people.
The government leaders made several other attempts other than creating legal hurdles. President Wickremesinghe on January 6 summoned the members of the Election Commission to his office and requested them to resolve the conflicts of opinion among them and it was given wide publicity. However, no such conflicts have been evident so far. He also made a subtle warning that the elections and the GCE Advanced Level examinations might clash which was also proved to be an unfounded fear.

Meanwhile, Secretary to the Ministry of Public Administration, Neil Bandara Hapuhinna had sent a letter to the Returning Officers on January 9 instructing them to stop accepting deposits from the candidates contesting the LG elections. Media reported that Hapuhinna had sent this letter in accordance with a decision by the Cabinet. Later Hapuhinna apologized to the Election Commission for this.

On January 18, two members of the Election Commission, namely S. B. Diwaratne and K. P. P Pathirana, had received death threats, demanding that they resign from their posts. Another Commission member M. M. Mohamed, also had received similar death threats on January 27, to resign from his position. It was said that a CID investigation has been initiated, but the outcome of it is yet to be revealed by the authorities. In fact, one member of the Commission, P.S.M Charles who worked in the North and East during the war as a District Secretary, handed over her resignation to President Ranil Wickremesinghe on Wednesday, January 25 which was accepted by the President on February 7.

Irrespective of whether the government has the capacity to fund the LG elections which were postponed by one year in February last year, it has been hell-bent on preventing them from happening as scheduled

It was against this backdrop that the funding for the election has come to the fore. Though Commissioner General of Elections, Saman Sri Rathnayake stated on January 8 that Rs.10 billion has been allocated for the Local Government polls, Treasury Secretary Mahinda Siriwardena, in relation to a writ application filed by a Retired Sri Lanka Army Colonel, W. M. R. Wijesundara seeking an order to delay the LG polls, had informed the Supreme Court via an affidavit on January 19 that sourcing funds for the election has become a challenge. The petition will again be taken up for hearing on February 23.

This series of events validly raises the question how independent the Election Commission is. In fact, recent events had raised the same question in respect of some other “Independent” commissions as well. Especially, the current power crisis exposed the vulnerability of the independence of two commissions, the Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka (PUCSL) and the Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka (HRCSL).

The conflict of opinion between the PUCSL Chairman Janaka Ratnayake and the Power and Energy Minister Kanchana Wijesekara has emerged over the demand by the Ceylon Electricity Board (CEB) to raise electricity tariffs for the second time. It was only in September last year that the CEB increased the tariff by 75 per cent. The row between the PUCSL Chairman and the Minister escalated with the announcement by the former not to interrupt power supply during the GCE A/L examination between January 23 and February 17.

The CEB ignored the PUCSL Chairman’s announcement. The latter challenged the CEB’s action in the Court of Appeal, but the court rejected it on February 10. Earlier, on January 24 the HRCSL had summoned the PUCSL Chairman Janaka Ratnayake and the Secretary to the Ministry of Power and Energy among others for an inquiry as to why they failed to prevent the implementation of power cuts during the ongoing examination. During the discussion, it was agreed that no power cuts will be imposed from January 25 until 17 February.
When the CEB continued with its power cuts ignoring the agreement, the HRCSL filed a case in the Supreme Court on January 30 for contempt of the commission. The court rejected it. Though one cannot challenge the court ruling, it was a fact that the CEB reneged on the agreement its representative arrived at with other relevant parties on power cuts.

Sometimes the members of independent commissions themselves act in a manner that erodes their independence. Three days after Gotabaya Rajapaksa was sworn in as the President on November 18, 2019, the then Criminal Investigation Department (CID) Director SSP Shani Abeysekara was transferred to Galle by the National Police Commission. It was well known that Abeysekara handled so many high-profile cases against incidents that took place during the previous Rajapaksa government. Subsequent incidents including his arrest very clearly showed the attitudes of Rajapaksas towards him.

The Chairman of the National Police Commission Chandra Fernando and another commission member P.P. Perera had gone to the VIP terminal of the Katunayake airport on November 20 last year when there was a welcome party for former minister Basil Rajapaksa on his return to the country from the US. Whatever the subsequent reasoning of the Police Commission Chairman on his presence at the venue, pictures of him worshipping Rajapaksa had gone viral.
During the last Parliamentary election, one of the members of the Election Commission Professor Ratnajeevan Hoole created a controversy with a comment he made during an interview with the Jaffna-based DAN TV. His comment in Tamil was clearly against the SLPP, but the inadvertent jumbling flow of the comment and the lack of Tamil knowledge of his accusers finally saved his skin.

The independent commissions were established by the 17th Amendment to the Constitutions in 2001 during President Chandrika Kumaratunga’s tenure in order to dilute the executive powers of the President over State machinery. Hence, President Mahinda Rajapaksa, in 2010 made them redundant by way of bringing them under his purview through the 18th Amendment. Again they were detached from the President’s direct control by the 19th Amendment during the so-called Yahapalana government in 2015, but only to reverse it by another Rajapaksa, President Gotabaya Rajapaksa using the 20th Amendment in 2020. Last year’s Aragalaya, the public uprising compelled the current government to somewhat release them again from the clutches of the President.

Every time when they were strengthened they were expected to pave the way for the public service and the judiciary to act independently and without the fear of penalisation by the Executive. However, recent incidents raise the question about the degree of independence of independent commissions.

Posted in Uncategorized

LG Election: Monitors have their say on lack of funds

The National Center for Election Monitoring of Sri Lanka has urged the National Election Commission to hold discussion with stakeholders to solve the issues related to the provision of funds for the Local Authorities Election.

The NCEMS issuing a statement said the Election Commission should solve the possible problematic situations related to the provision of funds before it turns into a major crisis, through negotiations between the relevant factions.

The NCEMS in a letter has also cautioned that such a situation might arise and requested to hold a discussion between the government, the Treasury and the Election Commission immediately.

The Monitoring Body noted that instead of threatening government officials and intimidating them, relevant officials should hold talks to solve the issues related to lack of funds to conduct the election.

The National Center for Election Monitoring of Sri Lanka added that the threats and intimidation of state officials have an effect on holding a free and fair election and that there is a possibility of very negative effects on the election.

Therefore, the NCEMS requested that according to a specific time schedule, a programme to obtain the funds required for the election should be made through agreements between all parties.

US delegation led by Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary at Defence Ministry for talks

A US delegation that arrived in the country on Tuesday (14) night aboard two US Air Force planes had met with State Minister of Defence Premitha Bandara Tennakoon and Secretary of Defence General Kamal Gunaratne (Retd).

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Indo-Pacific Security Affairs Jedidiah P. Royal led the delegation that arrived in the country on Tuesday (14) night aboard two US Air Force planes.

The US delegation met with the State Minister of Defence Premitha Bandara Tennakoon and Secretary of Defence Ministry General Kamal Gunaratne (Retd) at the Defence Ministry.

A statement noted that the discussions were centred on boosting US – Sri Lanka ties.

In addition, security cooperation enhancement, and regional defence stability enhancement were also discussed.

How the Chinese are destroying Sri Lankan fishing community

The beautiful island nation Sri Lanka, also known as ‘the pearl of the Indian ocean’, has been going through its toughest economic crisis since its independence in 1948. Another victim of the vicious ‘debt-trap diplomacy’, Sri Lanka has seen significant growth in Chinese influence in the recent past.

While the entire world witnessed the tragedies of Hambantota port and Colombo port city projects, not much has been said about the exploitation of marine species and resources in Sri Lanka by the Chinese. A report published by South Asia Foresight Network (SAFN) titled ‘The baneful existence of Chinese sea cucumber farms in Sri Lanka’ attempts to quantify the damage caused to the environment and local communities by the presence of Chinese sea cucumber farms.

Considered a delicacy in China, sea cucumbers are often served during banquets and dinners. In addition, sea cucumbers are used in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) to cure impotence, joint pain, etc., enhance sports performance and are known to have anti-fatigue effects. All these factors have made sea cucumbers one of the most expensive seafood items that already have a huge market available for business. The demand for sea cucumber has been on the rise which has led to the construction of massive farms along the Lankan coastline.

The Ministry of Fisheries leased out sea land plots ranging between one to ten acres on the seashore. The largest fish breeding sites are located near shallow coastal lands due to favorable marine environment including sunlight and sea plants. While all these factors make Sri Lanka a suitable place for sea cucumber farming, large-scale production could prove to be catastrophic. These areas are usually surrounded by thick electric fences keeping in line with the pen culture method.

About 4000 sea cucumbers can be bred at one time in one acre of area. In a sea cucumber hatchery, the baby animals are nursed for up to four months before they are sold to commercial farms run by locals. These babies then take at least ten months to mature and ready for export. According to the report, in 2020 alone, Sri Lanka exported about 326 tons of sea urchins with China being the biggest buyer. But the story began in 2015 when the Sri Lankan government issued a gazette notification on sea cucumber farming and proposed an area of 10,000 acres for the same. In 2016, a sea leech hatchery was established by a Chinese joint venture company ‘Gui Lan (Pvt) Ltd’ on the northern peninsula to facilitate the export of sea cucumbers and urchins to China. The company was registered as a private limited liability company with a registered address in Negombo with two Chinese and a Sri Lankan being named as directors in April 2016.

In June 2022, welcoming Chinese investment in the country, the Sri Lankan cabinet approved a proposal for a large-scale commercial sea leech and sea cucumber farming project spanning 5,000 acres in the districts of Jaffna, Mannar, Kilinochchi and Batticaloa in the Northern and Eastern Provinces. The government also plans to set up an export village in an area spanning 100 acres.

As per the report, the approximate price range for Sri Lankan Sea Cucumber is between US$ 30.39 and US$ 54.69 per kilogram or between US$ 13.78 and US$ 24.81 per pound (lb) in 2022. In 2017, a kilo of sea cucumber was priced at US$21.64 and in 2019 the price went up to $30.39 per kilo.

In India, though illegal, a kilo of sea cucumbers can fetch about Rs 50,000 and some fishermen could even earn Rs. 2 lakhs in a single day. This highly-priced delicacy is helping Sri Lanka bring in the much-needed foreign currency to combat the ongoing economic crisis in the country but not without a cost.

While the Sri Lankan government is busy counting the money, the local fishermen communities have been suffering because of the prevalent socio-economic and environmental issues. The report sheds light on the illegal operations of the Gui Lan joint venture, which has failed to secure a permit from the National Aquaculture Development Authority of Sri Lanka (NAQDA) for its new nursery in Kowtharimunai in Pooneryin. This new nursery is located only a few kilometers away from the company’s Ariyalai hatchery in Jaffna. According to the report, the establishment of this new nursery has led to acres of sea-land being fenced off for sea cucumber harvesting, shutting
out the traditional fishermen who harvest prawns for a living. The large nets on the shallow
waters of the sea prevent the breeding of fish, crabs, and prawns, posing a serious threat to longterm sustainability of the region. It was also found that out of 90 sea cucumber farms in the Jaffna
DS alone, and only 48 have permits. This makes most of the sea cucumber farms illegal in the
North.
The laid-back attitude of the authorities resulted in no proper action has been taken yet. About
3,200 small-scale fishing families have been seriously affected by the creation of sea leech farms,
losing their livelihoods during an ongoing economic crisis in the country. A group of fishermen
has also started a hunger strike near the Kiranchi fishing harbor because the roads leading to
their boats for fishing activities has been blocked due to the permission of a group of fishermen
to set up sea leech cultivation boxes. The fishermen point out that if out of 100 fishermen even
just 10 set up a sea leech farm, the livelihood of the remaining 90 who catch shrimp, prawns and
other fishes is put at stake. Out of the 17,000 fishing families living in the Northern Province, less
than 1000 have been selected to work in these farms, leaving the remaining 16,000 Dhiwara
families at risk of losing their livelihood and falling into the streets. This has led to continuous
protests demanding the closure of the illegal sea leech farms in Punagari, Kirawan and Ilavankuda
areas.
Not only the local communities but also the marine biodiversity has been seriously impacted by
the operation of these farms. The report states that at the hatchery, high levels of electricity, fuel
and water are required during the feeding stage to maintain the culturing water temperature
and oxygen status for juvenile sea cucumbers, which has a significant environmental impact. In
addition, high levels of fossil fuel emissions from energy use, large amounts of nitrogen and
phosphorus discharged in wastewater, and a low utilization rate of post-production waste
contribute to pollution in the farm area. Moreover, the lights aimed at the sea urchin production
farms across the lagoon are switched on in the evening which affects the movement of fish and
prawns toward the shore. These organisms live near the coast or move towards the sea
depending on the salinity of the waters. Chinese companies like Gui Lan have constructed several
sea cucumber farms with electric fences along the seashore, restricting the movement of other
aquatic species towards the coast during monsoon season. The operation of such farms without
proper planning and study has raised many obvious problems, especially in the sea areas where
shrimps, crabs and squids breed naturally.
This malevolent practice could pose a serious threat to the long-term sustainability of the region.

Sea cucumbers help detoxify contaminants in the soil and other environments and help in nutrient cycling and redistribution of sediments, making them excelling bioremediators. Moreover, they help increase seawater alkalinity, which creates buffers against ocean acidification, supporting the survival of coral reefs. In order to run a sea cucumber farm, wild sea cucumbers are caught from the sea and placed in the farms and hatcheries. This creates an ecological imbalance in the ocean, which leads to polluted and murkier waters in the areas where sea cucumber population has declined.

The report provides a great insight into the lesser-known back channel economic interest of China in Indian Ocean and the littoral states. Given the tremendous threat sea cucumber farms pose as highlighted in the report, the Sri Lankan government must take quick action to solve the problem and work to improve the living condition of the fishing community through the right technology and clean investments from local entrepreneurs. Handing over the coastline to Chinese domination will only bring disaster to humans as well as the marine environment.

Source:Colombo Gazette

Posted in Uncategorized

Future elections run risk of being postponed based on the lack of funds claim – Former EC Chief

Former Commissioner of Elections, Mahinda Deshapriya says any future election is at risk of being postponed if the excuse claiming there is a lack of funds is accepted at this juncture. Addressing a press conference yesterday Deshpriya said accordingly it will be possible to delay any election in the future if the upcoming Local Government is postponed based on the fact. He also said in reality an election only costs Rs. 8 billion contrary to the Rs. 10 billion announced and even then the funds are not required at once. He added that the entire amount is not necessary during the preparation period. “Initially the EC only requires Rs. 2.5 – 3 billion. Even that amount can be disbursed in parts,” he noted.

The Former Commissioner said it is possible to hold the elections as scheduled by having discussions with the Treasury, the IGP, the Government Printer and various other parties. When asked how he would have faced the current issues in holding the elections, Deshapriya refused to answer and said it is up to the current Election Commissioner and the members to decide how they will resolve the conundrum.

Posted in Uncategorized

Govt Printer seeks tightened security for LG polls printing work

Initial printing activities pertaining to the 2023 Local Government Election have been completed, Government Printer Gangani Kalpana Liyanage says.

Speaking to Ada Derana, Liyanage mentioned that ballot paper printing activities, however, continue to face hindrances without adequate security in place.

Despite the requests made to the police chief to deploy 60 police officers (35 during daytime and 25 at night) to oversee the security measures during ballot paper printing, only three police officers have been deployed, according to the Government Printer.

The Government Printer further stated that printing of notices on polling queues is expected to commence today.

Meanwhile, the Election Commission noted that the postal voting of the LG election can be held on February 22, 23, 24 and 28 as scheduled if the ballot papers are received no later than tomorrow.

However, if the ballot papers are not provided on time, the election body says it hopes to decide on new dates for the postal voting of the LG election.

On Tuesday (Feb 14), the Election Commission, citing “unavoidable reasons”, announced that ballot papers for the postal voting could not be distributed as scheduled on February 15.

Against this backdrop, the National People’s Power (NPP) has handed over a letter to the United Nations compound in Colombo detailing the alleged attempts to postpone the LG election.

Postal voting for LG polls postponed indefinitely

The postal voting for the 2023 local government election was postponed until further notice, Election Commissioner General Saman Sri Rathnayake announced today.

He said the postal voting was scheduled for February 22, 23, 24 and 28.

The Commissioner General said the postal voting was postponed as the Government Printer has not supplied the postal ballot papers on time as agreed.

He said new dates for postal voting will be announced in due course.

Posted in Uncategorized

Crucial discussion between Election Chief and Treasury Secretary

Chairman of the National Election Commission Nimal Punchihewa is scheduled to hold talks with the Secretary to the Treasury today pertaining to the Local Authorities Election.

Chairman of the Commission Nimal Punchihewa said he is hoping to summon the Treasury Secretary over the failure to release the funds requested by the Election Commission for the Local Authorities Election.

Several seniors Finance Ministry officials are also expected to attend the meeting.

Meanwhile, the Elections Chief said he is hoping to resolve the matter following talks. Nimal Punchihewa has also held discussions with the Government Printer pertaining to the Local Authorities Election.

The Commission has pointed out the importance of the Department of Government Printing releasing the printed ballot papers, other documents and materials needed to conduct the election promptly.

On Tuesday, it was announced that the issuance of postal ballot papers for the Local Authorities Election will not take place as planned due to the delay in the Department of Government Printing releasing required documents and materials.

Independent MPs was to summon P’ment immediately

The Freedom People’s Congress in a letter to the Prime Minister have requested for Parliament to be summoned immediately, under Standing Order 16.

The letter bearing the signature of the General Secretary of the Freedom Peoples’ Congress notes that the decision to indefinitely delay the issuing of ballot papers for the Local Government Election is a threat to Sri Lanka’s democracy.

The letter further notes that the National Election Commission had observed that the reason for the decision to indefinitely delay the issuing of ballot papers for the Local Government Election was that the Treasury had failed to deliver funds for printing, and based on that the Government Printer had refused to go ahead with the printing process.

It notes that Parliament should convene immediately as Public Representatives, as the legislators, are bound to control the undemocratic situation, and managed the situation as well.

14 MPs had signed the letter that was addressed to the Prime Minister.

China’s loans to Sri Lanka have been “quasi-predatory”, says Lankan economist -By P.K.Balachandran

Dr. Muttukrishna Sarvananthan of Point Institute of Development in Jaffna, says that Chinese lending to Sri Lanka between 2007 and 2022 was marked by an absence of due diligence, hidden conditions and aggressive lobbying with Sri Lankan politicians and bureaucrats. These are “predatory”. But considering the lower rates of interest charged, the lending could be termed “quasi-predatory”, he says.

Sarvananthan’s contentions are found in his critique of “Evolution of Chinese Lending to Sri Lanka since the mid-2000s – Separating Myth from Reality” written by Umesh Moramudali and Thilina Panduwawala and published by the China-Africa Research Initiative of the School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) at the Johns Hopkins University.

In the critique entitled Chinese Lending to Sri Lanka: A Factual cum Reality Check: A Rejoinder to Umesh Moramusali and Thilina Paduwawala, Sarvananthan agrees that the leasing of the Hambantota International Port (HIP) to a Chinese company in 2017 was neither an “asset seizure” nor a “debt-to-equity swap.” It was not an “asset seizure” because the port was never made collateral for the loans from the China Exim Bank. It was not a “debt-to-equity swap” either, because the money received for granting 85% of the equity stake to the China Harbor Group was not utilized to repay the loans borrowed for the purpose of building and expanding the port.

As Moramudali and Panduwawala point out, the funds obtained from the Chinese company for leasing the port for 99 years, were used to pay off Sri Lanka’s International Sovereign Bonds (ISB).

But this was malpractice, Savananthan contends. “The utilization of the proceeds of the leasing of the HIP to augment the balance-of-payments or for the repayment of a maturing ISB/s is a dubious accounting practice of the Government of Sri Lanka and a gross violation of the International Public Sector Accounting Standards of an accountable democratic state,” he says.

The Chinese lender (EXIM Bank of China) had also erred, he adds. “If it is indeed a responsible and accountable state-owned lender of the world’s second-largest economy, the EXIM Bank of China should have insisted that the money paid by the China Harbor Group (CHG) to the Government of Sri Lanka (GOSL) for the acquisition of 85% equity stake in the HIP should be channelled to repay the loans obtained from the EXIM Bank of China to build and subsequently expand the HIP.”

“If the lender for the HIP was a state-owned bank from a Development Assistance Committee (DAC) member bilateral donor, the foregoing dubious transaction by the GoSL would not have been allowed.”.

Hidden Debt

Moramudali and Panduwawala found that the loans obtained from China for Hambantota port (HIP) were being serviced by the Treasury of Sri Lanka. In 2017, the Treasury had taken over these loans from the balance sheet of the Sri Lanka Ports Authority (SLPA). Between 2013-2017, these HIP loans were included in the balance sheet of the SLPA as a “non-guaranteed” foreign loan to the SLPA.

This is a “classic example of a hidden debt,” Sarvananthan says. Neither the GoSL nor the Chinese lender was transparent as per international practice, he notes.

According to Moramudali and Panduwawala, the “Auditor General noted that the outstanding balance of four China EXIM loans for Hambantota port construction were not recorded in the government’s outstanding debt stock. While debt repayments were made on time by the Treasury and tracked by the ERD (External Resources Department of the Central Bank) outstanding loan amounts were not recorded by the SLPA or the Treasury in annual balance sheets.”

Moramudali and Panduwawala further pointed out that the signing of all five loan agreements between SLPA and a Chinese supplier or contractors responsible for constructing the port, had taken place months before the signing of the loan agreement between the GoSL and ChEXIM. To Sarvananthan, this is another example of the “predatory nature” of the Chinese loans for the Hambantota port. He asks: “How could the SLPA sign contracts with Chinese suppliers and contractors even before the loan agreement was signed?”

Sarvananthan points out that the 6.3% interest charged on the first agreement dated October 30, 2007, for a loan of US$ 307 million, and 6.5% interest charged on the second agreement dated August 06, 2009, for a loan of US$ 65 million for the Hambantota port by the Exim Bank of China were “exorbitant” given the fact that the effective LIBOR (London Inter-Bank Offered Rate) was just 2% in 2009.

Predatory Lending

Sarvananthan defines predatory lending as “severe conditions” that can be aggressive sales/lobbying tactics, very high-interest rates (usually 3-digit interest rates), overcharging for administrative costs, non-disclosure of risk factors by the lender, failure to carry out due diligence with regard to the technical feasibility and/or financial viability of a particular project, or very high collateral requirement, a very stringent penalty in the event of default, or a combination of the foregoing.”

Failing to carry out due diligence with regard to the financial viability/commercial potential of most of the projects funded by China in Sri Lanka would also fall in that category. Due diligence was lacking in the case of the Hambantota port, the Mattala airport, the Colombo Lotus Tower and Sri Lanka’s capacity to repay was also not factored in, Sarbananthan points out.

Sarvananthan considers lobbying for projects aggressively by submitting unsolicited project proposals with suggestions for Chinese funding mechanisms as predatory. “Chinese state-owned companies could also be potentially involved in bribing politicians and/or bureaucrats in their host countries, which is termed corrosive capital,” Dr.Sarvananthan alleges.

Dubious Cancellations

The Jaffna-based economist considers the abrupt and arbitrary cancellation of the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) funded US$ 1.6 billion Light Rail (LRT) project in Colombo in 2020 dubious. He points out that immediately after the cancellation of the LRT project in January 2020, the China Harbor Engineering Corporation (CHEC) was given the contract to build an elevated highway connecting the Colombo Port City and Thalawathugoda (replacing the proposed LRT system) without calling for open tender.

“This is a classic case of project grabbing by Chinese state-owned companies and predatory lending by Chinese state-owned financial institutions,” Sarvananthan asserts.

Similarly, the East Container Terminal (ECT) of the Colombo port was to be developed jointly by India, Japan, and a local private company (John Keels Holdings) in terms of a trilateral agreement signed in 2017. But this was abruptly abrogated by the government in 2021 with the purported view to developing it entirely by the Sri Lanka Ports Authority (SLPA). However, in January 2022, it was reported that the ECT is to be jointly developed by China Harbor Engineering Corporation (CHEC) in partnership with a local company, Access Engineering, Sarvananthan says.

Citing another example, the Lankan economist says Sri Lanka bought Sinovac COVID-19 vaccines in June 2021 from China due to the delay in receiving the second dose of AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines from India. There were allegations in the media that the Ministry of Health was paying a higher price to purchase Sinovac from China than the price paid to AstraZeneca from India.

“When a journalist requested the Ministry of Health to disclose the purchase price of Sinovac, it refused to disclose the price because of a gagging agreement between the Chinese Embassy in Colombo and the local company involved in the purchase on behalf of the Ministry of Health. It was reported that the Chinese Embassy in Colombo had informed the Ministry of Health that if the purchase price was made public the order will be cancelled, ostensibly because of a ‘special price’ offered to Sri Lanka,” Sarvananthan says.

“It is this kind of non-transparency in the official business dealings between China and Sri Lanka that leads to accusations of predatory practices,” he observes.

However, Sarvananthan prefers to consider Chinese loans to be “quasi-predatory” rather than “predatory”, taking into account the comparatively low-interest rates they carry.