If Religion is the Opium of People By N Sathiya Moorthy

When people voted the centre-left JVP-NPP to power last year, they had thought that they were voting for ‘change’, not only as far as governmental policies and programmes went. They did not expect much change in either of the two, given the inherent institutional limitations. What they instead expected was a new ‘political culture’, top-down, bottom-up.

Come the nation-wide local government elections, and you now have the JVP-NPP leadership starting from President Anura Kumara Dissanayake, every tested trick in the trade that had been in vogue for generations of political parties since before Independence. Translated, the centre-left leadership is following in the footsteps of Comrade Karl Marx, who said, ‘Religion’ is the opium of the people.’ If their non-left, anti-left right reactionaries, while in power, could feed the people more of it, can Dissanayake & Col be seen as doing injustice to Marx?

It is thus that the government reportedly caused the display of Lord Buddha’s Tooth Relic at Sri Dallada Malligawa in Kandy, for the nation’s Sinhala-Buddhist majority to clear their minds and brains before queuing up before the polling stations on 6 May. According to reports, an expected 20 million Buddhists are expected to have darshan, standing in long queues that on days stretch 10 km and more. At least four persons have lost their lives standing in the queue and many more have been hospitalised, possibly owing to the summer-heat.

Mastermind of ‘em all

It does not stop with the Sinhala-Buddhist majority, when it comes to the government parties wooing the voters. There is no majoritarianism of the kind displayed by their predecessors when it comes to matters of religion when mixed with matters of elections, you should say of their secular approach.

Yes, it’s about the Easter blasts six years back – rather the fresh police probe ordered by the present government. The way President Dissanayake and Media Minister Nalinda Jayatissa were going about it through their public statements every day at every venue, the government should not be upset if someone thought that they personally and not the Police-CID wing was in charge of the fresh probe into the 2019 ‘Easter blasts’.

If however there is some breathing space now to the discourse, at least directly from ruling JVP-NPP leaders, it does not seem to flow from a sudden adherence to discretion. Instead, the passing on of Pope may have meant that it was improper for them to campaign in the name of religion – which it after all was – when the Catholic community in the country was in mourning, like their brethren across the world.

In the campaign prior to Pope’s passing-on, minister Jayatissa in particular used to hint at his knowing much more about the daily probe outcomes than he was telling the media and through them the nation. This raises a further question if the investigation team was getting fresh directions from the political leadership every other day, going beyond the ‘need-to-know’ clause that is generally attached to such high-profile, sensitive investigations.

In between, you have had the Catholic Bishops Conference telling the government that the CID investigations should also identify the ‘mastermind’ behind the blasts other than those already identified on-the-spot, and are all dead. Such a construct prima facie implies that there was a larger conspiracy and the Catholic Church would not be satisfied if the police did not come up with (new) names for the mastermind(s).

It is immaterial how high and mighty those ‘great conspirators’ may be, but then even the very idea of a larger conspiracy can be established only when the CID investigations moved further. In effect, if some of those later charged with a role in a greater conspiracy approaches the court that they were ‘fixed’ to please someone somewhere, then the judges may be constrained to consider that possibility more than at present.

It is in this context, you need to recall at every turn, the American FBI’s findings that Zahran Hashim, a sucide-bomber among the perpetrators of the heinous crime, was the master-mind. This is what then Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe said on the night of the serial blasts that shook the nation and the region after a decade after the dreaded LTTE’s exit.

It would be a feather on the Sri Lankan CID’s cap if they could prove that there was a real mastermind behind the FBI-identified master-mind. The general perception here and elsewhere is that the FBI does a thorough job, because it has abundant resources at its disposal for its agents to undertake world-wide travel to follow any lead that might have come their way.

That American lives too were lost in the Easter blasts was reason and justification for the FBI to get involved goes without saying. But the question is if the Sri Lankan police and government should accept the FBI’s findings as gospel truth that should not be revisited, reviewed and reinvestigated.

Thankfully, minister Jayatissa has since conceded, in public, that it was the ‘responsibility’ of the police and courts to ‘reveal’ the mastermind(s)behind the blasts. What he possibly left unsaid was that he and his President were only helping the police CID up to the ‘mastermind’ that their investigations otherwise may, or may, not expose.

Divine opportunity

Guess what is still the height of the ‘Religion…opium’ mix? Or, is it only a mix-up, still? The other day, newspapers reported that JVP-NPP’s candidate for the prestigious Colombo mayoralty, Vraie Cally Balthazaar, her running mates and party colleagues campaigning for her, participated in the memorial bhajans and pujas on the 14th death anniversary of Sri Sathya Sai Baba, in the national capital.

Sai Baba was a Hindu god man based in south India, with permanent abodes in native Puttaparthi in Andhra Pradesh and White Field, in what used to be suburban Bangalore, now Bengaluru, capital of neighbouring state of Karnataka. Maybe (or, maybe not), the candidate and her supporters are all followers of Sai Baba, but they have considered their presence at the Baba bhajan session as a divine occasion and opportunity to mix religion and politics, to attain the desired results in both, at one-go.

The good thing about Sri Lankan left theology is that unlike the founders and followers of communism elsewhere, they are not atheists. Instead, they are as much believers as any other. The way communism propped up in the country may have something to do with it.

Missing symbolism

Sri Lanka, earlier Ceylon, has been an avowedly religious country with even more religious people. As is known, the rural poor, their women especially, save all that they can through a long life of hardship only to go on a pilgrimage to centres of Buddhist religious importance in India. Once done, they are mentally and spiritually ready to depart.

Recall how S W R D Bandaranaike mixed symbols of religion, (Sinhala) nationalism and politics to win the historic 1956 elections, and that is the path that even the (breakaway?) JVP walked despite taking extremist positions in everything else, starting with their violent methods to oppose / challenge the State, and at the same time, reach out to the people.

Today, there is hardly any centre-left leader in the country, including those from the JVP, who are not seen without the sacred pirit thread around their wrists. They clearly indicate that their differences with the traditional political opposition is only about socio-economic ideology, and not every day practices. It begins with religion, as with every good thing and its good beginning. In the case of others before them, it however did not end there.

But then government leaders are not known to have extended such religious symbolism to the nation’s Muslim community, at least not yet – did you say?

(The writer is a Chennai-based Policy Analyst & Political Commentator. Email: sathiyam54@nsathiyamoorthy.com)

Over 90% of Polling Cards Distributed

Sri Lanka Post said that over 90% of the official polling cards for the local government elections have been distributed.

Deputy Postmaster General Premarathna Herath stated that the door-to-door distribution of these polling cards will be completed by tomorrow.

Voters who have not received their official polling cards by tomorrow can collect them from their nearest post office.

This opportunity will be available until 4 PM on May 6th, the day of the election.

The postal voting for the local government elections continues today for the third day and is scheduled to conclude tomorrow.

LG Polls: Postal Voting Continues Today

Eligible voters can continue to mark their postal votes for the upcoming local government elections today, between 8:30 AM and 4:15 PM.

Chairman of the Election Commission R.M.A.L. Ratnayake confirmed that those who are unable to cast their postal votes today can do so tomorrow.

Meanwhile, the distribution of official polling cards is scheduled to conclude tomorrow as well.

The local government elections are set to take place on May 6th.

Posted in Uncategorized

China to send top Minister to SL amid trade roiled by Trump’s tariffs

In the wake of Sri Lanka trying hard to mitigate the impact from the chaotic announcement of reciprocal tarrifs announced by U.S. President Donald Trump, Chinese Commerce Minister Wang Wentao is expected to visit Sri Lanka in June in a bid to foster trade links, an informed source said.

The Chinese authorities in Sri Lanka indicated about such a visit during a recent meeting at the Trade Ministry.

Following tariffs announced by the U.S. President, the countries across the globe look for new markets instead of depending solely on one country or bloc. The U.S. and the European Union absorbs a bulk of Sri Lankan exports at the moment.

Following President Trump’s decision, Sri Lanka now remains engaged with the U.S. authorities to seek redress from reciprocal tariffs after the 90-day pause now in progress. The government has pledged to increase imports from the U.S. to narrow the trade gap which is now in favour of Sri Lanka.

In the meantime, the Chinese Commerce Minister is slated to arrive here in the backdrop of Sri Lanka seeking to expand its export markets. The programme agenda is yet to be worked out.

China and Sri Lanka started negotiations on a Free Trade Agreement more than ten years ago. Talks currently remain stalled.

After six rounds of negotiations, the FTA discussions came to a standstill in 2018 over tariff lines and the value of trade to be liberalised.

Following the visit of President Anura Kumara Dissanayake to Beijing, Sri Lanka and China had greed to work toward an early conclusion of a comprehensive FTA.

China is the 10th export destination for Sri Lanka. The total export value from Sri Lanka to China was US $ 251.91 Mn in 2024 and total imports from China to Sri Lanka for the same period were US $ 4,332.48 million. China is the first import origin for Sri Lanka, the Export Development Board said.

Sri Lanka-based FitsAir starts business class

Sri Lanka-based FitsAir said it was starting business class from April 25 with flexible rebooking and lounge access, combining a premium service with its low cost offering.

FitsAir’s route network includes South Asia and the Middle East.

“As a low-cost carrier, our goal has always been to make air travel more accessible,” Ammar Kassim, Executive Director of FitsAir, said in a statement.

“Following the launch of Business Class, we’re taking that a step further, allowing the budget-conscious traveller to experience the comfort, exclusivity, and personalised service traditionally reserved for premium fares.”

The upgraded service includes includes priority check-in, fast-track boarding, and expedited baggage handling along with flexible rebooking and cancellation options, targeting business travellers.

Business Class passengers get a baggage allowance of 40kg check-in and 10kg hand luggage, free seat selection and personal in-flight entertainment devices.

Posted in Uncategorized

Panic in Pakistan as India vows to cut off water supply over Kashmir

Spraying pesticides on his parched vegetables one street away from the Indus River, Pakistani farmer Homla Thakhur is worried about his future. The sun is at its peak, the river is running very low, and India has vowed to cut supplies upstream after a deadly militant attack in Kashmir.

“If they stop water, all of this will turn into the Thar desert, the whole country,” said Thakhur, 40, before heading back to the river to refill the tank for the spray gun.

India says two of the three militants who attacked tourists and killed 26 men in Kashmir were from Pakistan. Islamabad has denied any role and said “any attempt to stop or divert the flow of water belonging to Pakistan … will be considered as an Act of War”.

The treaty split the Indus and its tributaries between the nuclear-armed rivals.

Government officials and experts on both sides say India cannot stop water flows immediately, because the treaty has allowed it to only build hydropower plants without significant storage or dams on the three rivers allocated to Pakistan. But things could start changing in a few months.

“We will ensure no drop of the Indus River’s water reaches Pakistan,” India’s water resources minister, Chandrakant Raghunath Paatil, said on X.

He did not respond to questions about the fears in Pakistan.

Two Indian government officials, who declined to be identified discussing a sensitive subject, said the country could within months start diverting the water for its own farms using canals while planning hydroelectric dams that could take four to seven years to finish.

Immediately, India will stop sharing data like hydrological flows at various sites of the rivers flowing through India, withhold flood warnings and skip annual meetings under the Permanent Indus Commission headed by one official each from the two countries, said Kushvinder Vohra, a recently retired head of India’s Central Water Commission.

“They will not have much information with them when the water is coming, how much is coming,” said Vohra, who was also India’s Indus Commissioner and now advises the government occasionally.

“Without the information, they cannot plan.”

And it is not just agriculture, a shortage of water will also hit electricity generation and potentially cripple the economy, economists say.

Vaqar Ahmed, economist and team lead with UK consulting firm Oxford Policy Management, said that Pakistan had underestimated the threat of India walking away from the treaty.

“India hasn’t got the kind of immediate infrastructure to halt the waterflows, especially during flood times, so this period creates a crucial window for Pakistan to address the inefficiencies in its water sector,” he said.

“There are a lot of inefficiencies, leakages.”

Running Disputes

In recent years, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government has been seeking to renegotiate the treaty and the two countries have been trying to settle some of their differences in the Permanent Court of Arbitration in the Hague over the size of the Kishenganga and Ratle hydroelectric plants’ water storage area.

“We can now pursue our projects in free will,” said Vohra.

In a letter on Thursday, India told Pakistan that circumstances had changed since the treaty was signed, including population increases and the need for more cleaner energy sources, referring to hydropower.

A World Bank spokesperson said it was a “signatory to the treaty for a limited set of defined tasks” and that it does “not opine on treaty-related sovereign decisions taken by its member countries”.

Nadeem Shah, who has a 150-acre farm in Sindh where he grows cotton, sugar cane, wheat and vegetables, said he was also worried about drinking water.

“We have trust in God, but there are concerns over India’s actions,” he said.

The three rivers meant for Pakistan, a country of 240 million people, irrigate more than 16 million hectares of farmland, or up to 80% of the total.

Ghasharib Shaokat of Pakistan Agriculture Research, a Karachi research firm, said India’s actions inject uncertainty “into a system that was never designed for unpredictability”.

“At this moment, we don’t have a substitute,” he said. “The rivers governed by the treaty support not just crops, but cities, power generation, and millions of livelihoods.”

The treaty remained largely unscathed even when India and Pakistan fought four wars since separating in 1947, but the suspension sets a dangerous precedent, Pakistani politicians said.

“We’re already locked into generations of conflict, and by exiting the Indus Water Treaty, I believe we’re locking future generations into a brand new context of conflict,” said Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, Pakistan’s former foreign minister.

“That must not happen.”

Source: Reuters

Posted in Uncategorized

Steps will be taken to release all lands taken over during the war: President

Steps will be taken to release all plots of lands that were taken over by security forces during the war and return them to the civilians, President Anura Kumara Dissanayake has stated.

The President made this statement while attending a public meeting organized by the National People’s Power (NPP) in Kilinochchi.

Expressing his views at the event, the President said that the current government will support the reconstruction of the houses that were destroyed during the war, and steps will also be taken to reopen the main roads in Kilinochchi that were closed during the conflict.

Further expressing his views, the President said:

“We know that lands belonging to civilians have been handed over to the military citing security reasons.

We have discussed with the relevant military officers and commanders. We are taking steps to return every inch of land that can be released back to civilians.

Not only that, some lands that have been traditionally used for cultivation were taken over by the Forest Conservation Department based on Google Maps. These are lands cultivated by the people of this region, and we are taking steps to return them after proper examination.

Similarly, several roads have been closed. In Colombo, the roads in front of the Presidential Secretariat and the President’s House have been opened. Then why are the roads in Kilinochchi still closed? We will reopen all those roads so that people can travel freely. We have already reopened a large number of roads in Jaffna. We want to bring this country back to normal.

We also recognize that many people in the North have lost their houses due to the war and do not have the means to rebuild. Our government will support the construction of houses for all those people.”

Posted in Uncategorized

Why Sri Lanka’s Rejection of a Land Bridge With India Is the Right Call -The Diplomat

The Sri Lankan government has reportedly informed India that it is not ready for physical land connectivity between the two countries, despite long-standing interest from sections of Colombo and New Delhi policy circles, and rapid progress made in that direction during the Ranil Wickremesinghe administration.

This is an important moment in Sri Lanka’s foreign policy under President Anura Kumara Dissanayake, and the decision has drawn mixed reactions.

Given South Asian interstate relations, Indian foreign policy, and Sri Lanka’s efforts for strategic autonomy post-independence, Colombo’s decision to resist physical connectivity with its giant neighbor is a reasoned move to preserve national sovereignty, geopolitical balance, and long-term economic autonomy.

The Palk Strait Bridge is a bridge or tunnel connecting Dhanushkodi in Tamil Nadu, India, to Talaimannar in Sri Lanka’s Mannar District. The idea for such a link was first floated by Wickremesinghe when he was prime minister in the early 2000s; it was a priority of his “Regaining Sri Lanka” Initiative. Wickremesinghe reached a preliminary agreement on the bridge with India’s then-Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee. However, Wickremesinghe’s hopes sank along with the Norwegian-brokered ceasefire between 2002 and 2006, and the discussion on a land bridge was shelved for at least a decade.

Discussions on land connectivity again commenced in earnest from 2022, when Wickremesinghe was elected president by members of the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna, the political party created by the Rajapaksas, for the Rajapaksas. The proposal to connect the two countries with a land bridge was central in agreements arrived at during Wickremesinghe’s visits to India in 2023 and Indian Minister of External Affairs S. Jaishankar’s visit to Sri Lanka in 2024.

Yet, Sri Lanka’s new leadership has made it clear that it is not willing to pursue the project at this time, despite India showing a keen interest to follow through on the agreements made during Wickremesinghe’s tenure as president.

Geopolitical Symbolism and Sovereignty Risks

Proponents of the bridge argue that land connectivity is a step toward economic integration.

However, physical connectivity with India is not merely about infrastructure; it carries significant symbolic and geopolitical implications. A land bridge implies permanence, dependence, and an implicit ceding of strategic autonomy.

A land bridge between the two countries eliminates a natural buffer that has preserved Sri Lanka’s independence across millennia. Since independence, a key component of Sri Lankan foreign policy has been to ensure that it doesn’t become a satrapy of India, and successive governments have tried balancing India by partnering with extra-regional powers like the United Kingdom, China, and the United States. This balancing act depends not only on diplomatic nuance but also on physical distance and the perception of independence. A land bridge will erode both.

Moreover, as the world becomes multipolar, smaller states are better off leveraging neutrality to negotiate better terms with great powers. In such a situation, Sri Lanka must convey that it is a neutral and independent state, and not a vassal of India. Becoming physically connected to India could dissuade other countries from deepening ties with Sri Lanka out of concern that Colombo has effectively become a client state of New Delhi.

Security Concerns and Internal Instability

While there were many reasons for the decision, it is obvious that security concerns played an important role. In the past, the porous nature of maritime routes between India’s Tamil Nadu and Sri Lanka’s Northern Province facilitated not just trade but also militant movement and illegal immigration. The civil war that lasted nearly three decades was shaped in part by the complex cross-border ethnic and political ties between Indian and Sri Lankan Tamil populations.

The establishment of a land bridge would significantly lower the cost and difficulty of unauthorized crossings between the two countries. Given the sheer volume of potential traffic, it would be impossible to prevent the illegal and informal flows of people and goods even with the best customs and immigration infrastructure. These increased inflows, whether of migrants, contraband, or ideologies, would stir ethnic tensions, strain local institutions, and repoliticize ethnic issues that Sri Lanka has worked hard to put behind.

It is also not difficult to imagine that India’s internal politics, particularly the Tamil Nadu-Center relations as well as growing Hindutva tendencies, would spill over into Sri Lanka’s multiethnic political environment, further inflaming divisions.

Economic Arguments Don’t Hold Up

Those who support land connectivity with India often cite economic integration and expanded trade as justifications. However, evidence for such claims is thin. Trade within South Asia remains abysmally low despite all South Asian states, apart from the Maldives and Sri Lanka, sharing land borders with India.

Since the 1950s, policymakers and business elites in the smaller South Asian countries have believed that increased regional trade would disproportionately benefit the dominant regional partner, i.e., India. This has made the smaller states shy away from the institutionalization of regional trade arrangements. India, which accounts for 80 percent of the South Asian GDP, has also shown little interest in opening up its markets to the smaller neighbors.

Most South Asian states also see India as their main external threat. Moreover, there are few economic complementarities in South Asia; apart from India and Pakistan, the other South Asian nations do not have diversified industrial bases and often produce similar goods. A land bridge, without addressing any of these issues, would not lead to an increase in trade.

More importantly, India is unlikely to tolerate Sri Lanka as a logistical or commercial intermediary between South Asia and the wider Indo-Pacific at its expense. Some in Sri Lanka seem to believe that it can play the role of Hong Kong with regard to India. However, Sri Lanka does not operate in the same context as Hong Kong when China opened up in the late 1970s. India has trade links with the entire world, and faces lesser tariffs from the U.S. and EU markets. Thus, there is no reason for anyone to use Sri Lanka as a gateway to or from India.

What Sri Lanka needs is not greater dependency on one neighbor, but diversified trade and investment routes. Strengthening digital connectivity, enhancing port efficiency, investing in renewable energy partnerships, and attracting high-value services are more pragmatic paths for economic growth than a high-risk land bridge that could yield modest commercial gains and disproportionate geopolitical costs.

Pragmatism Over Symbolism

In choosing not to pursue land connectivity with India, the Sri Lankan government has demonstrated a clear-eyed understanding of its geopolitical reality. It is a small state located near a hegemonic neighbor, and in a region of great power competition. For some, physical integration with India might seem like a harmless infrastructure project, but those familiar with history know it carries disproportionate strategic risks that could undermine Colombo’s ability to remain a neutral, sovereign actor in the Indian Ocean.

The challenge for the Dissanayake-led National People’s Power government is to chart a foreign policy that protects Sri Lanka’s autonomy without alienating any of its key partners. In this regard, rejecting the land bridge proposal is a move rooted in pragmatism, not paranoia. It signals a willingness to engage with India, but on terms that are equitable and strategically sound. And that, in the long run, is the only sustainable path forward.

Posted in Uncategorized

SL, USA to reach bilateral trade agreement: PMD

Sri Lanka and the United States agreed to continue the discussions on reciprocal tariff with the objective of finalising a bilateral trade agreement between the two countries,the President’s Media Division (PMD) said.

A statement issued by the PMD said both sides expressed the desire to finalise the agreement in the shortest possible time period.

The PMD said a Sri Lankan delegation met US Trade Representative Ambassador Jamieson Greer on 22 April, 2025 at the US Trade Representative Office in Washington DC.

The Sri Lankan delegation, on the instructions of President Anura Kumara Dissanayake, who is also the Minister of Finance, handed over the originals of communications addressed to US Trade Representative Ambassador Greer on behalf of the Government of Sri Lanka.

The delegation updated Ambassador Greer on the challenges that Sri Lanka has faced in the past and the steps that are being taken by the Government of Sri Lanka to overcome future challenges and move towards full economic recovery.

The Sri Lankan delegation also highlighted the prompt and positive commitment of the Government of Sri Lanka to work with the US Government in reducing the trade deficit and lowering tariff and non-tariff barriers.

Ambassador Greer was appreciative of the proposals that Sri Lanka has made in order to commence negotiations and expressed the hope that an agreement can be reached soon between the two countries to ensure fair and equitable trade relations.

Later on that day, the Sri Lankan delegation met the USTR delegation appointed by Ambassador Greer and led by Assistant United States Trade Representative, In-charge of South and Central Asia, Brendan Lynch along with Director In-charge of South Asia, Emily Ashby to discuss further the offer made in writing by Sri Lanka to the US.

The two sides agreed to continue the discussions with the objective of finalising a bilateral trade agreement between the two countries. Both sides expressed the desire to finalise the agreement in the shortest possible time period.

The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) is responsible for developing and coordinating U.S. international trade, commodity and direct investment policy, and overseeing negotiations with other countries. The head of USTR is the U.S. Trade Representative, a Cabinet member who serves as the President’s principal trade advisor, negotiator and spokesperson on trade issues.

President Dissanayake condoles with PM Modi over Pahalgam terror attack

President Anura Kumara Dissanayake has strongly condemned the recent terrorist attack in Pahalgam, India, which claimed the lives of several tourists.

In a telephone conversation held earlier today with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, President Dissanayake expressed his deep shock over the incident.

The call, which lasted nearly 15 minutes, served as an opportunity for the Sri Lankan leader to convey solidarity with India during this difficult time.

“Sri Lanka has always shared a deep bond of brotherhood with the people of India,” President Dissanayake said, adding that his government unequivocally condemns terrorism in all its forms, regardless of where it occurs.

The President also extended heartfelt condolences on behalf of the Government and the people of Sri Lanka to the families of the victims, while wishing a speedy recovery to those injured in the attack.