No one can prevent NPP victory; government servants, police, army support us: AKD

Claiming that some people entertain doubts that President Ranil Wickremesinghe will resort to a trick at the last moment to prevent a National People’s Power (NPP) victory, NPP leader Anura Kumara Dissanayake said today that no can prevent the NPP’s victory this time.

Speaking at a rally in Minuwangoda, he said the majority of government servants, police and army personnel support the NPP this time and said that Ranil Wickremesinghe will not be able to resort to any tricks.

“People entertain doubts that Ranil Wickremesinghe will resort to some sort of trick at the last moment. He cannot resort to any tricks. The majority of the government servants support the NPP. The majority of the police and army personnel also support us. Retired police and army officers are with us. So, no one can prevent the NPP from coming to power,” he said.

Dissanayake said, for the first time that the NPP will form a government to look after the people, adding that so far governments have been formed to look after families and friend of the rulers.

Sri Lanka to continue to oppose UNHRC Resolutions

Sri Lanka will continue to oppose UNHRC Resolution 46/1 and 51/1 which were adopted by a divided vote in the Council, diplomats in Colombo were informed.

Minister of Foreign Affairs Ali Sabry convened a briefing on current developments in Sri Lanka for the Colombo-based diplomatic corps at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

During the briefing, Minister Sabry emphasized several significant achievements across various fronts during the past year, including advancements in economic recovery, legal reforms and the strengthening of domestic institutions and mechanisms focused on reconciliation.

Minister Sabry highlighted that the Government has taken concerted efforts towards the establishment of a Commission for Truth, Unity and Reconciliation including gazetting the draft bill, and tabling it in the Parliament.

As the Minister of Justice, he reiterated the progress that has been achieved in drafting comprehensive legislation on counter terrorism to replace the PTA, and notable progress on matters related to reconciliation processes coming under the purview of the Ministry of Justice, including the advancements made by the Office on Missing Persons (OMP), Office for Reparations (OR) and Office for National Unity and Reconciliation (ONUR).

An overview of the economic revival of the country was provided by the Governor of the Central Bank Dr. P. Nandalal Weerasinghe, also highlighting the envisaged way forward for continued economic stabilization, while conveying appreciation to the international community for their support towards Sri Lanka’s economic recovery. J.M.S.D. Ratnayaka, Additional Director General of the Department of National Planning, Ministry of Finance, Economic Stabilization & National Policies briefed the participants on the social safety measures implemented by the government and the newly launched Social Protection Policy to support vulnerable groups.

Foreign Secretary Aruni Wijewardane called on the Colombo-based Diplomatic community to understand the current situation in Sri Lanka, support the progress made thus far, and invited them to participate during the Interactive Dialogue on Sri Lanka at the upcoming session of the Human Rights Council.

She also highlighted Sri Lanka’s continued cooperation with the UN human rights mechanisms as well as with the multilateral system. However, Sri Lanka will continue to oppose UNHRC Resolution 46/1 and 51/1 which were adopted by a divided vote in the Council.

Representatives from the Ministry of Justice, Prison Affairs and Constitutional Reforms, Attorney General’s Department, Office on Missing Persons, Office for Reparations, Office for National Unity and Reconciliation, Interim Secretariat of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, and the Office for Overseas Sri Lankans were also present at the briefing.

Members of the Diplomatic Corps expressed appreciation for the regular briefings provided by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on the current situation and the steps taken towards recovery and reconciliation, and the regular engagement with related agencies.

Northern fisherfolk sell Chinese rice donation on pavement as they cannot stick to it

Northern fisher families who received the generous Chinese ‘humanitarian assistance’ of packets of rice recently, are selling them on the pavement as they are not familiar with how to make ‘Chinese sticky rice’.

The Chinese rice variety, which is different when it comes to preparation, style, and taste compared to local Naadu types, gave a hard time to local fisherfolk who tried the same methods of cooking with the Chinese donated rice.

The Chinese rice donation was among the Rs 1.5 billion worth of humanitarian assistance, which includes a prefabricated housing scheme and fishing equipment for fisherfolk in the Northern and Eastern provinces.

The three aid packages, amounting to Rs 500 million each, would be the largest offered by China in the two provinces, where India has also invested heavily in development, livelihood and investment projects.

One local fisherman who sold the donated Chinese rice through an underground agent also expressed concerns with one of the other donated items – prefabricated housing, saying this is not conducive to living in a province that records higher temperatures for most of the months.

He had an interesting suggestion: give the items to politicians and officials.
Since most of the temporary shelters or vaadi houses erected on coastal lines to store fishing equipment caught fire due to unknown reasons, he is of the view that these prefab houses can be used as vaadi houses for better utilisation.

Posted in Uncategorized

Major ITAK split over presidential candidate

Ilankai Thamil Arasu Katchchi (ITAK) leader S Shiritharan extended his support to presidential candidate P Ariyanenthiran despite his party yet to make a final decision on which candidate it will support in the upcoming election.

Mr Shritharan met Tamil ‘common candidate’ Ariyanenthiran, who is also a Central Committee member of ITAK, on Thursday at his residence in Jaffna and declared his support for his candidacy.

Mr Shritharan stressed that it was his personal decision to support Mr Ariyanenthiran considering the ‘fate of the party’ and the well-being of the people who elected him to Parliament.

Meanwhile, the ITAK Central Committee, which met recently, called for an explanation from Mr Ariyanenthiran over his decision to agree to become the candidate without the approval of the party.

The initiative to form the Tamil People’s General Council to field a ‘common candidate’ at the upcoming polls came following an understanding reached between seven political parties and seven civil society outfits, which signed an MoU on July 22.

Describing the move as “selfish and unwise,” one senior ITAK leader said the party was considering asking their cadres and supporters to make their own presidential choice – just like the leader (Shritharan) did – rather than coming to a collective agreement.

Posted in Uncategorized

To re-democratize Sri Lanka, abolish executive presidency: activists

A group of lawyers, academics, and civil rights activists have called for the abolition of the executive presidency, saying it has failed to deliver the aims for which it was introduced over four decades ago.

The presidency was introduced in 1978 for accelerated and sustained economic growth and development; communal harmony; and political stability, the group of professionals and 8 civil society organizations said.

“It has worsened rather than improved peace and stability, by accelerating ethnic conflict and making our political system prone to frequent crises,” the statement said.

“The executive presidential system produces these undesirable outcomes because, through its lack of accountability and responsiveness, it allows authoritarianism, corruption, and incompetence to trump the common good of Sri Lanka and Sri Lankans.

“We therefore strongly believe that this is the single most important reform that is essential for the meaningful and irreversible re-democratisation of Sri Lanka.”

They called on presidential candidates to commit to end executive presidency.

The full statement is reproduced below:

We the undersigned call upon all candidates contesting the forthcoming 2024 presidential election to firmly and publicly commit to the abolition of the executive presidential system within the first year of the next Parliament.

The experience of 46 years of the operation of the 1978 Constitution shows that the executive presidential system has not delivered on any of the aims for which it was introduced: accelerated and sustained economic growth and development; communal harmony; and political stability. Executive presidentialism has only had a negligible impact on development. It has worsened rather than improved peace and stability, by accelerating ethnic conflict and making our political system prone to frequent crises.

The executive presidential system produces these undesirable outcomes because, through its lack of accountability and responsiveness, it allows authoritarianism, corruption, and incompetence to trump the common good of Sri Lanka and Sri Lankans. We therefore strongly believe that this is the single most important reform that is essential for the meaningful and irreversible re-democratisation of Sri Lanka.

While recent experience since 2022 has only highlighted the autocratic potential of this system, we recall that in the history of presidential elections since 1988, there have been more popular mandates than not for the abolition of the executive presidency. Most recently, the people clearly made the connection between this system and the causes of bad governance and economic collapse when, during the Aragalaya of 2022, they called for ‘system change’. The only way ‘system change’ can even begin to be delivered is by abolishing the executive presidency.

List of Signatories

Individuals

1. Geoffrey Alagaratnam, President’s Counsel
2. Daniel Alphonsus
3. Dr A.M. Navaratne Bandara
4. Daneshan Casie Chetty
5. Bishop Duleep de Chickera
6. Anushaya Collure
7. Anushya Coomaraswamy
8. Dr Radhika Coomaraswamy
9. Dr Tara de Mel
10. Anoma De Silva
11. Minoli de Soysa
12. Visaka Dharmadasa
13. Fr Noel Dias
14. Rohan Edrisinha
15. Nirmaleeni Eriyagama
16. Priyanthi Fernando
17. Suresh Fernando
18. Rosanna Flamer-Caldera
19. Bhavani Fonseka
20. Dr Rajni Gamage
21. Dr Mario Gomez
22. Prof Savitri Goonesekera
23. Prof Camena Gunaratne
24. Sharmaine Gunaratne
25. Melani Gunathilaka
26. Dr Samanthi J. Gunawardana
27. Dr Ruvaiz Haniffa
28. Dr Sanjana Hattotuwa
29. Tracy Holsinger
30. Elijah Hoole
31. Rajan Hoole
32. Ameena Hussein
33. K.W. Janaranjana, Attorney-at-law
34. S.T. Jayanaga, President’s Counsel
35. Chandra Jayaratne
36. Prof T. Jayasingham
37. Tissa Jayathilaka
38. Dr Nihal Jayawickrama
39. Sarah Kabir
40. Dr Sakuntala Kadirgamar
41. Prof Gamini Keerawella
42. Dr Harshan Kumarasingham
43. Jayanthi Kuru-Utumpala
44. Danushka S. Medawatte
45. Anura Meddegoda, President’s Counsel
46. Buhary Mohamed
47. Manoj Nanayakkara, Attorney-at-law
48. Prof Arjuna Parakrama
49. Prof H.R. Pasindu
50. Dr Pradeep Peiris
51. Binendri Perera
52. Dr Jehan Perera
53. Nadishani Perera
54. Srinath Perera, Attorney-at-law
55. Dinal Phillips, President’s Counsel
56. Saliya Pieris, President’s Counsel
57. Ven. Kalupahana Piyaratana
58. Mirak Raheem
59. Dr Ramesh Ramasamy
60. Prof Ruvani Ranasinha
61. Ravi Ratnasabapathy
62. Roel Raymond
63. Dr Kanchana Ruwanpura
64. Athulasiri Kumara Samarakoon
65. Jeanne Samuel
66. Dr Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu
67. Dr Kalana Senaratne
68. Prof Tudor Silva
69. Vanie Simon
70. M.A. Sumanthiran, President’s Counsel
71. Ermiza Tegal, Attorney-at-law
72. Prof Chandragupta Thenuwara
73. Sandun Thudugala
74. Prof Deepika Udagama
75. Prof Jayadeva Uyangoda
76. Gamini Viyangoda
77. Dr Asanga Welikala
78. Dr Shamara Wettimuny
79. Dr Jayampathy Wickramaratne, President’s Counsel
80. Anoma Wijewardene
81. Dr Roshan de Silva Wijeyeratne
82. Dr Joe William
83. Godfrey Yogarajah

Organisations

1. Alliance Development
2. Association of War Affected Women
3. Centre for Policy Alternatives
4. Eastern Social Development Foundation
5. International Centre for Ethnic Studies
6. Institute of Political Economy
7. Law and Society Trust
8. Transparency International Sri Lanka

Posted in Uncategorized

Namal’s Challenge: Nationalism and Rajapaksa Legacy

‘I Am Ready for the Challenges; … We always believed in nationalism, and we need to protect that. We believed the policies that suit our country were not addressed by the government.’ – Namal

The outdated and distorted strategy of ‘Sinhala-Buddhism,’ long exploited by the old guard, is no longer effective. Recent statements by Namal Rajapaksa suggest that both he and the few survivors in his party still grapple with this deeply ingrained issue, which distorts rather than reflects the true essence of Buddhism. Additionally, it will take at least another decade and a half to erase the Rajapaksa image from public perception, so Namal will need to practice patience.

To stay relevant in today’s politics, Namal—the ‘son’ who, (despite being eighteen years younger) has shown more maturity than the other ‘son’ in the presidential race—needs to move beyond the Rajapaksa image and ideology and adopt modern thinking. However, one positive aspect is that his candidacy has tackled the major challenge the incumbent faced: the ‘Rajapaksa saviour’ label.

Employing extremist Sinhala Buddhist forces to combat other forms of extremism, rather than addressing the root of the problem perpetuates a harmful cycle. ‘Sinhala Buddhism’ represents a significant departure from the philosophy of Buddhism or the Dhamma. The concept was increasingly manipulated by the political class of ’56, to maintain or gain power with the lower class masses. This distortion has led to the normalisation of hate speech and violence. The original teachings of Buddhism advocate for peace and moral behaviour, but the politicised version of Sinhala-Buddhism has unfortunately turned these principles on their head, fostering an environment of division and aggression instead of harmony.

History of ‘Sinhala Buddhist’ Hegemony

Sinhalese elites used manipulation and force to tighten their control, pushing aside minorities and hindering democratic progress. These power grabs, rooted in British colonial divide-and-rule tactics, strengthened Sinhalese dominance while ignoring minority needs. Identity politics, especially Sinhala-Buddhist nationalism and the push for a Sinhala-Buddhist state, were key tools in this process. The dominance of the Sinhalese elites led to rising tensions with Tamil communities, sparking armed conflict and civil war, which further weakened state-building efforts.

By early 1970s, Sinhalese elites faced challenges from both Tamil groups and radical Sinhalese youth, leading to anti-elite uprisings. This notion provides ideological satisfaction to the masses while delivering political and economic benefits to the elites. Sinhala-Buddhist nationalism has not improved living conditions for Sinhalese-Buddhist community. Its characteristic discrimination has fostered manipulative politics, neglecting deep democratic issues. The post-war resurgence of this nationalism and the lack of opposition suggest little progress towards genuine democratic development.

The rise and fall of a political dynasty

In 2020, four brothers from the Rajapaksa dynasty held the Presidency, the Prime Minister’s office, and key portfolios like finance, defence, and interior. At the height of their power, they seemed invincible, but an economic crisis they caused led to their downfall. Before launching his campaign, Namal Rajapaksa visited temples with his father, continuing their tradition of temple ceremonies, which align with the Sinhala Buddhist populism that has fueled their rise a decade ago.

At the peak of their power, the Rajapaksas seemed untouchable, signing massive infrastructure deals, amassing wealth, and avoiding accountability in a state they fully controlled. Human rights defenders criticised their corruption, and crackdowns, but the public largely ignored these warnings. However, as Sri Lanka plunged into its worst economic crisis since Independence in 1948—marked by fuel shortages, power cuts, and soaring inflation—the public’s support began to wane. This shift marked the beginning of the end for the Rajapaksa dynasty, one of South Asia’s most powerful political families.

Namal Can
Lead, if…

If young Namal hopes to lead the nation in the future—a currently unlikely prospect—he will need to distance himself from the Post-Independence Rajapaksa legacy and adopt a more dynamic and innovative approach. He should draw inspiration from his granduncle, Don Mathew Rajapaksa (DM) member of State Council of Ceylon-1937/45, who, along with DS Senanayake, had a forward-looking vision. DM, the “Lion of Ruhuna,” and his two sons, George and Luxman who represented Mulkirigala, Tissamaharama in 1960s and 70s, were prominent figures in Southern province politics. They played a significant role in promoting the welfare of the oppressed and downtrodden people in Giruwapattuwa until they bid farewell to politics with a clean record. Following DM’s death, his brother DA (grandfather of Namal) was elected uncontested. DA chose to follow the ‘Expedient Utopian’ Bandaranaike in 1951 and crossed over to the opposition to form the ‘Sinhala-Buddhist’ SLFP.

DM introduced and wore the Kurahan Saataka to symbolise the tragic destiny of the Giruwapattu people. This contrasts sharply with the 21st-century use of the Kurahan Saataka by the cartoonists to symbolise a corrupt rule by DA Rajapaksa’s sons.

The Executive Presidential system has clearly failed to deliver on its original promises of sustained economic growth, communal harmony, and political stability. Instead of progress, the country has faced persistent economic challenges, deepened ethnic divisions, and increased conflicts, leading to a more fragmented society. Politically, the system has fostered frequent crises and instability. These failures stem from the system’s inherent flaws—centralised power without sufficient checks and balances. This has allowed authoritarianism, corruption, and incompetence to thrive, serving the interests of a few while undermining the common good and eroding trust in public institutions.

Rather than focusing on nationalist sentiments that resonate mostly with the older generation; now that Namal has jump the gun with his early entry into the race, he should distinguish himself by addressing the abolition of the system and power devolution, unlike the other candidates. (Rhetoric by some claiming they will eliminate the executive presidency is not taken seriously by an electorate familiar with such bogus promises). By leading a campaign aimed at future elections, Namal can attract the younger generation, including the 14 to 18 age group that will vote in 2029, positioning himself as a forward-thinking leader.

This strategy could significantly enhance his profile as a potential future leader, positioning him as a serious contender for higher office. In contrast, if he fails to adapt and continues with a lackluster campaign led by left over ‘Johnnies and cronies’, he risks his political career by securing a mere 2 to 3% of the vote. This would likely result in him finishing in a low position, such as fifth or sixth, which would be a considerable setback and could damage his long-term prospects in the political arena.

Embracing a non – Rajapaksa persona would not only require shedding the controversial baggage associated with DA Rajapaksas’s second generation political brand, but also actively engage with progressive and inclusive policies that address the diverse needs and aspirations of Sri Lanka’s populace including the minorities. By redefining his public image and policy stance; Namal could possibly reposition himself as a leader capable of uniting and leading the nation in a new direction, perhaps in the mid-21st century.

-kksperera1@gmail.com

President briefs Catholic Bishops’ Conference on Easter attacks probe

President Ranil Wickremesinghe briefed the Catholic Bishops’ Conference on the progress over the investigations into the Easter Sunday attacks.

The President’s Media Division said that Wickremesinghe met with the President of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference and Bishop of Kurunegala, Most Rev. Dr. Harold Anthony Perera along with the Secretary General and Auxiliary Bishop of Colombo, Most Reverend Don Anthony Jayakody.

During the discussion, they addressed key issues, including education reforms, the progress of the Easter Sunday investigation, environmental concerns and matters related to the Catholic Church.

President Wickremesinghe also provided an update on the current state of the economy and outlined the government’s upcoming measures to tackle challenges related to the cost of living.

The meeting was also attended by several other members of the Sri Lanka Bishops’ Conference.

Posted in Uncategorized

Indian Navy’s Frontline Warship to Visit Colombo

Indian Navy’s frontline Warship INS Mumbai, will arrive Colombo on 26 August 2024 on a three-day visit. The ship will be received in a ceremonial manner by the Sri Lanka Navy.

INS Mumbai is the third of the Delhi class destroyers, indigenously built and commissioned into the Indian Navy on 22 January 2001. The Ship was built at Mazagon Dock Limited in her namesake city Mumbai. The ship completed it’s mid-life upgrade and joined Eastern Naval Command in Visakhapatnam on 08 December 2023. This is INS Mumbai’s first visit to any port in Sri Lanka and will be the eighth port call by Indian Ships this year. INS Kabra, Karanj, Kamorta and Shalki visited this year in addition to Indian Coast Guard ships Samarth, Abhinav and Sachet.

INS Mumbai will be bringing essential spares for the Dornier maritime patrol aircraft operated by Sri Lanka Airforce. The Dornier aircraft provides a unique and critical capability of surveillance over the Sea Area of Responsibility (AOR) of Sri Lanka since induction two years ago. This has also greatly enhanced the Search and Rescue capability in Sri Lanka’s vast EEZ. In addition to training the SLAF Pilots, Flight Navigators, Indian Navy is supporting the maintenance of this aircraft with a Technical team and spares. Indian Ship visited earlier this year, also brought in material assistance. INS Kabra and later ICGS Sachet had brought spares parts for Sri Lanka Coast Guard ship Suraksha.

During the stay in Colombo, INS Mumbai will conduct familiarization tour onboard for Sri Lanka Navy personnel aimed at sharing best practices between both the Navies. It can be recalled that visit for Long specialization course student officers and Cadets of Naval and Maritime Academy, Trincomalee was organized onboard the submarine Shalki, during port call earlier this month, adding value to their training. Indian Navy also provides various specialist courses including in core area of Hydrography in India for capacity building of the Sri Lanka Navy.

On arrival, Commanding Officer will Call on the Commander of the Western Naval Area Rear Admiral W.D.C.U Kumarasinghe at Western Naval Area Headquarters. The ship will also undertake joint activities with Sri Lanka Navy such as sports fixtures, Yoga and beach cleaning.

It has been customary for Indian Naval Ships to make Port call at Sri Lankan ports, when transiting between Arabian sea and Bay of Bengal. The visit is categorized as an Operational Turn Around (OTR), wherein the ship will also replenish fuel and provisions. The crew will find time for rest and recuperation and also an opportunity to visit few places of importance in the city and some popular tourist attractions in Colombo and Galle.

INS Mumbai will depart the island on 29 August 2024.

Posted in Uncategorized

2024 Presidential election divides Muslim parties By D.B.S.Jeyaraj

Nominations have closed for the long awaited 2024 presidential election. 39 candidates are in the fray.It is widely acknowledged by the press and public that the chief presidential contenders are incumbent president Ranil Wickremesinghe,leader of the opposition Sajith Premadasa and JVP/NPP leader Anura Kumara Dissanayake. Two others expected to make a mark are Namal Rajapaksa and Dilith Jayaweera.

However the icing on the winning candidate’s cake would be the minority vote. In a keenly contested poll that is likely to trifurcate the Sinhala vote in near equal proportion, the minority community vote could very well provide the necessary numbers to clinch victory. In such a situation the voting pattern of the premier numerical minorities assumes crucial importance.

Sri Lanka’s last official census was taken in 2012. According to that census, Sri Lanka’s majority ethnic community the Sinhalese comprises 74.9 % of the island nation’s population. Numerically, the second largest ethnicity is the Sri Lankan Tamils who are 11.1% of the population. The third largest ethnicity is the Sri Lankan Muslims or Moors who comprise 9.3% of the population. The fourth largest ethnic group is the Tamils of Indian origin known as “Malaiyagath Thamizhar” (Hill Country Tamils) who are 4.1%.

The three numerical minorities namely the Sri Lankan Tamils, Muslims and Indian Tamils together are 25.5% of the population. Since the people of all districts vote together in the Presidential elections, the entire island is transformed into a “single” constituency with a 74.9% Sinhala majority and 25.5 % non – Sinhala minorities.

It is against this backdrop that this week’s column examines the impact of the 2024 presidential election on Sri Lankan Muslim politics. The focus of this two-part article would be on the three Muslim political parties represented in Parliament and their response towards the presidential poll. The roles played by Tamil political parties would be discussed in future articles.

Three Muslim Parties

While there are Muslim MPs from different political parties in the current Parliament , there are only three Muslim Political parties represented in Parliament. They are the Sri Lanka Muslim Congress (SLMC) led by Rauff Hakeem MP, National Congress(NC)led by AHM Athaullah MP and All Ceylon Makkal Congress(ACMC) led by Rishad Bathiudeen MP. Their respective tallies in Parliament after the 2020 elections were SLMC – 5 ACMC – 4 and NC-1.

Of these parties the SLMC and ACMC have thrown in their lot with SJB leader Sajith Premadasa. They have joined the “Samagi Jana Sandhanaya (SJS) alliance and have pledged their support for Sajith Premadasa in the presidential election. The NC is committed to Ranil Wickremesinghe and will back him at the presidential poll.

In a bizarre turn of events , several Muslim MPs who were elected to Parliament on the SLMC or ACMC ticket have revolted against their party decision to support Premadasa. These MPs have declared their support for Wickremesinghe.The 2024 presidential election therefore has created a split in the main two Muslim parties with some MPs defying their leaders.

Among these are three MPs from the ACMC and one from the SLMC.There is uncertainty over another Muslim Congress MP. The SLMC leadership however has commenced disciplinary action against both MPs. One of these MPs has been appointed as a minister by President Wickremesinghe. The three MPs who were affiliated to the ACMC conducted a press conference where they were sharply critical of leader Bathiudeen.

While the SLMC and ACMC are caught up in the Ranil-Sajith divide, realities on ground indicate that a sizeable number of Muslims will support the JVP/NPP leader Anura Kumara Dissanayake at the elections. It appears that even as the Muslim party leaders are losing their hold over their MPs, the Muslim parties themselves are beginning to lose their grip on their voters.

The Muslim public is also much bemused by this recent turn of events. Although the SLMC and ACMC were part of the Samagi Jana Balavegaya(SJB) alliance at the 2020 elections and remained as part of the Sajith-led opposition in Parliament, both parties were expected to cross over to President Wickremesinghe’s side when the presidential poll took place. That did not happen. Both parties remained with Sajith and joined his SJS alliance. The decision taken by the leaders has led to an open rebellion by some MPs elected from these parties.

Athaullah’s National Congress

When Ranil Wickremesinghe became prime minister in 2022 May and executive president in July 2022, he extended an invitation to all political parties to support him in his efforts to repair and revive the economy.One of the earliest Muslim parties to do so was the National Congress(NC) led by AHM Athaullah.

The NC was aligned to the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna(SLPP) at the 2020 elections. It contested separately at the poll because the SLPP master strategist Basil Rajapaksa wanted a predominantly Sinhala candidate SLPP list for Amparai district. Athaullah got elected in 2020 due to the Tamil vote getting divided between the TNA list and the list headed by Vinayagamoorthy Muraleetharan alias Karuna.The NC contesting under the Horse symbol polled 38,911 (10.08%). Party leader Athaullah re-entered Parliament.

Despite winning Athaullah was not given any ministerial post though he had earlier been a senior cabinet minister in the Mahinda Rajapaksa Governments. It was said then that Athaullah’s loyalty was suspected by Basil because the NC leader had alleged secret dealings with former president Maithripala Sirisena. A disgruntled Athaullah marked time in the SLPP government until the “Aragalaya”crisis erupted. He then broke away and joined the group of “independents”led by Wimal Weerawana and Udaya Gammanpila

When Ranil took over the reins of Govt, Athaullah split from the independents group and backed the Ranil Govt. He expected a ministerial post but that did not materialise. Though disappointed Athaullah remained with Wickremesinghe and was one of the first to pledge support to Ranil’s presidential candidacy.

Athaullah’s decision to support Wickremesinghe was bitterly criticized by his political rivals. Apparently the legendary Muslim Congress leader MHM Ashraff was strongly opposed to Ranil Wickremesinghe in 2000 when Parliamentary polls were held. Ashraff refused to align with the Wickremesinghe-led United National Party(UNP) and opted to remain with Chandrika Kumaratunga’s Peoples Alliance(PA). Ashraff is reported to have then said in Tamil “Ranil Saarathiyaai Irukkum UNP busil Naan Aeramaattaen”( I will not get on board the UNP bus if Ranil is the driver) Ashraff died in a helicopter crash in September 2000.

In later years when SLMC leader Rauff Hakeem joined the UNP Govt led by Wickremesinghe, Athaullah referred to Ashraff’s saying and mocked Hakeem for going against the late SLMC leader’s thinking. Now with Athaullah backing Ranil,it is the turn of the NC leader’s detractors to roast him for flouting Ashraff’s wishes.

The important question is whether Athaullah would be able to deliver a sizeable chunk of votes to Wickremesinghe at the presidential elections. Athaullah hails from Akkaraippatru in Amparai district and has a lot of support there. He has even elevated Akkaraippatry town to a municipality and got his own son elected as Mayor. This blatant act of nepotism eroded Athaullah’s Akkaraippatru vote bank.

The NC also enjoyed support in areas like Addalaichenai and Sainthamarudhu earlier. The NC got an MP seat in 2020 due to substantial votes from areas other than Akkaraippatru. This vote base has now shrunk with National Congress stalwarts like Uduma Lebbe from Addalaichenai and Saleem from Sainthamarudhu joining the Muslim Congress. Nevertheless Athaullah the uncrowned King of Akkarapipattru is capable of garnering a minimum of 25,000 votes for Ranil in his fiefdom opine political observers. This is only a portion of the Muslim votes in Amparai district.

Endorsing Premadasa’s Candidacy

While the NC is backing Ranil, the other two Muslim parties are supporting Sajith. The Muslim Congress led by Rauff Hakeem and Makkal (Peoples) Congress led by Rishad Bathiudeen have joined the SJB alliance endorsing Premadasa’s presidential candidacy. Earlier both parties contested the 2020 poll on the SJB ticket and remained in the opposition.

As mentioned earlier both parties were expected to cross over to Ranil’s side and back the incumbent president at the 2024 poll. Most unexpectedly SLMC leader Hakeem and ACMC leader Bathiudeen have supported Premadasa and as a result face an inner-party revolt. How did this state of affairs come about?

Let us take the Sri Lanka Muslim Congress first. As is well known the SLMC is the premier political party representing the Sri Lankan Muslims especially in the Eastern province. The Muslim Congress aligned with the SJB in the 2020 elections. The SLMC contested on the SJB ticket in all districts except Batticaloa where it contested on its own under the party’s tree symbol.

The SLMC obtained five MP seats in 2020.Party leader Rauff Hakeem won in Kandy. HMM Harees and Faizal Cassim won in Amparai district.MS Thowfeek was elected in Trincomalee. Zainulabdeen Nazeer Ahamed was Elected MP in Batticaloa. He contested as SLMC while the other four contested as SJB.

20th Amendment Crisis

The SLMC was faced with an inner-party crisis within a few months of the 2020 election. Re-visiting this crisis and its consequences are very necessary to understand the reasons behind SLMC leader Rauff Hakeem’s current stance in the 2024 presidential poll. What happened in 2020 was this. The ruling Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna Govt introduced the 20th amendment to the Constitution.

This amendment was brought in mainly to dilute some provisions of the progressive 19th Constitutional amendment passed by the previous “Yahapalanaya”Govt. Among these were clauses relating to dual citizenship. The 19th Amendment had forbidden dual citizens from contesting in elections.Gotabaya Rajapaksa had to renounce his US citizenship to contest the presidency in 2019.

His brother Basil Rajapaksa also a US citizen wanted to re-enter Parliament in Sri Lanka but did not want to renounce US citizenship. Basil the master strategist of the SLPP wanted to enable dual citizens like him to become MPs through the 20th amendment. The SLPP had 145 MPs of its own and 6 MPs from parties affiliated to it. This was enough to have a two-thirds majority.Yet Basil did not want to take chances. So he engineered an arrangement with nine MPs from the opposition to get more supportive votes for 20 A.

The MPs consisted of four from the SLMC, three from the ACMC and one each from the SJB and SJB affiliated Tamil Progressive Alliance(TPA). While SLMC leader Rauff Hakim and ACMC leader Rishad Bathiudeen voted against the 20th amendment their party MPs numbering seven voted for it.

This embarrassed SLMC leader Rauff Hakeem greatly. Furthermore two Muslim Congress MPs Nazeer Ahamed and Harees alleged that they had voted for the 20th amendment with the consent and approval of leader Hakeem. This placed the SLMC leader in an unenviable position. His own MPs were now undermining his integrity by making such allegations after undermining his authority y voting for the 20th Amendment. In short they were adding insult to injury.

With four out of five MPs defying the party leadership, Rauff Hakeem was in a predicament. If the party were to take disciplinary action against them,it would be a case of penalizing 80% of its Parliamentary strength.

SLMC Counter Campaign

So Hakeem swallowed his pride and quietly began a counter campaign of re-integrating his prodigal MPs. The party went through the motions of seeking explanations from the errant MPs but was more interested in reconciliation as opposed to retribution. This attempt met with success in stages.

Trincomalee District MP Thowfeek long regarded as Hakeem’s most devoted disciple was the first to return to party folds. He was followed by Faizal Cassim. The mercurial Harees was a tough nut to crack. Ultimately, he too was back. It was Harees and Nazeer Ahamed who had openly accused Hakeem of having encouraged their voting for 20 A. Harees finally apologized openly for this. He was “rehabilitated” and appointed senior vice president of the party.

Nazeer Ahamed

But Nazeer Ahamed known as Hafiz for having memorised all 6236 verses of the Holy Quran did not fall in line like the other SLMC parliamentarians. Nazeer a former Eastern province chief minister was also the SLMC deputy leader. Yet he remained defiant of the SLMC leader and ingratiated himself further with the Gotabaya Rajapaksa Govt. He was appointed a cabinet minister for Environment in April 2022. Nazeer Ahamed continued as cabinet minister in the Govt headed by Ranil Wickremesinghe too.

Meanwhile the SLMC’s apex body known as the High Command (Athi Uyar Peedam) took a decision to vote against the 2022 Budget (Appropriation Bill) . Nazeer Ahamed breached party discipline by voting for it. The SLMC then expelled him from the party after going through the due process of calling for an explanation. Nazeer filed a petition in the Supreme court challenging his expulsion. After protracted legal proceedings, a three judge bench of the Supreme Court dismissed the petition and upheld the expulsion. The 62 page judgement delivered on 5 th October 2023 was a unanimous ruling.

As a result Nazeer Ahamed was unseated as an MP and ceased to be a cabinet minister. The SLMC’s Seyed Ali Zaheer Moulana replaced Nazeer Ahamed and was sworn in as Batticaloa district MP. Moulana had polled the second highest number of preference votes on the SLMC list at the 2020 hustings.

Supreme Court Ruling

The Supreme Court ruling on Nazeer Ahamed was a double delight to the Muslim Congress then . The SLMC has over the years established itself as the premier political party representing the Muslim people of Sri Lanka. While the party has an island-wide membership, the SLMC’s stronghold was the Eastern Province of Sri Lanka. Of Sri Lanka’s nine provinces, it is the East that has the largest concentration of Muslims.

Unfortunately, the SLMC has in the past been plagued by defections and cross-overs mainly from Eastern Province party MPs. Even though the SLMC rank and file along with supporters remain faithful to the party and its “Tree” symbol, such loyalty has not been displayed by some frontline leaders.

Muslim Congress leader Rauff Hakeem has been struggling to cope with this breakaway tendency and maintain party discipline. The SC ruling and consequent fate of Nazeer Ahamed strengthened the hands of leader Rauff Hakeem and the party hierarchy to maintain party discipline.

When the judgement regarding Nazeer Ahamed’s expulsion was delivered, I wrote an article about it in the “Daily FT”. In that I quoted Rauff Hakeem about the case and its implications. What Hakeem said then was as follows –

“The judgement by their Lordships have very lucidly compared and contrasted both local and foreign judgements relevant to the ‘Audi alteram partem’ rule and have concluded quite convincingly that duplicitous conduct by the Petitioner in deliberately avoiding to provide a written explanation for his conduct as a precursor to an inquiry by itself absolves the Party in that it had given the Petitioner the fair opportunity to be heard as required by the rule.”

“Though there was precedent for this in Gamini Disanayake case 30 years ago, it was frustrating experience for affected political parties ever since then as technicalities, procedural lapses and failure to follow the dictates of the party constitution had been cited by the judges to invalidate expulsions.”

Rauff Hakeem’s comments indicate the his satisfied state of mind at that point in time. The SC ruling upholding the expulsion of Nazeer Ahamed and its consequent unseating of him as MP was a shot in the arm for the SLMC and its leader. A prickly thorn in the flesh had been removed. Nazeer Ahamed like Humpty-Dumpty had had a great fall and been cut to size.

Nazeer Ahamed’s “Rise”

But to Hakeem’s utter chagrin , Nazeer Ahamed did rise again from that fall due to Ranil Wickremesinghe. It is this “rise”aided by the president that has contributed to the current state of affairs in which the Hakeem-led SLMC opposes Ranil and supports Sajith.

President Wickremesinghe appointed Nazeer Ahamed as Governor of the North-western province in May 2024. This may have irritated Rauff Hakeem but it was well within the rights of the president to do so . But what Nazeer Ahamed started doing after being appointed Wayamba governor was provocative to the SLMC in general and its leader in particular.

Nazeer Ahamed reportedly began “canvassing”for Ranil within the SLMC with the blessings of the president. The idea seemed to be that of promoting a split in the SLMC and getting MPs to support Ranil’s candidacy if the party leadership decided to support Sajith Premadasa. SLMC MPs were allocated large sums of money under the district de-centralised budget for development projects in their electoral districts

Rauff Hakeem

According to informed Muslim Congress sources, Rauff Hakeem had not intended to support Sajith over Ranil until the president began reaching out to SLMC MPs over the head of the party leader . Until then the SLMC leader was trying to bring about rapprochement between Ranil and Sajith and promote a re-unification of the UNP and SJB. Wickremesinghe going behind the back of the SLMC ledership with the alleged collaboration of Nazeer Ahamed had hurt and angered Hakeem say SLMC circles.”It became a prestige issue for the “Thalaiver”(leader) they say. While addressing the media after the party decision to support Sajith, the SLMC leader was critical of the president communicating with Muslim Congress MPs independently/

Rishad Bathiudeen

It is against this backdrop that the SLMC officially backed Sajith Premadasa;s candidacy as opposed to that of Ranil Wickremesinghe. This in turn has led to Muslim Congress MPs revolting against the leader’s decision to support Sajith over Ranil. What happened thereafter and also matters concerning Rishad Bathiudeen and the CMC will be related in the second part of this article.

END

D.B.S.Jeyaraj can be reached at dbsjeyaraj@yahoo.com

“50% of ITAK supports common Tamil presidential candidate”

Fifty percent of Ilankai Tamil Arasu Kachchi (ITAK) will support the Tamil common presidential candidate, Gurusuwamy Surenthiran, Media Spokesman, Tamil National Common Structure and Tamil Eelam Liberation Organisation (TELO) said during a televised interview recently.

Surenthiran said that they understand their candidate, P. Ariyanethran, will not be the winning presidential candidate but this is a great opportunity to demonstrate the electoral power of the Tamil people. He said C.V. Vigneswaran’s Tamil People’s Alliance, Selvam Adaikkalanathan’s Tamil Eelam Liberation Organisation (TELO), D. Siddharthan’s People’s Liberation Organisation of Tamil Eelam (PLOTE), Suresh Premachandran’s Eelam People’s Revolutionary Liberation Front (EPRLF), Democratic Crusaders party and former MP Srikantha’s Tamil National Party, supported the common candidate.

There were about 593,000 votes in the Jaffna District, about 306,000 votes in Vanni District, and about 900,000 votes in the Northern Province, he said. In the East there were about 1.3 million votes, he added.

“Altogether there are 2.2 million Tamil speaking voters,” he said.

Surenthiran said that while they intended to contest the 21 September presidential election, they were also open for supporting a main candidate who would agree to implement a political solution to the problems faced by the Tamils.

“In the coming weeks, we will show our strength and then negotiate. There are 2.2 million Tamil speaking voters in the North and East and everyone knows how important these votes are in a tight presidential election,” Surenthiran said.

“There are four main candidates in the coming presidential election, and this is the most competitive presidential elections in Sri Lankan history,” he said. Perhaps the winner would scrape through and all leading candidates needed the support of the Tamils in the North, he said.

He said that while Tamils had been demanding a common candidate, some sections of the ITAK, including MP M.A. Sumanthiran were opposed to the idea.

Sumanthiran has even declared that they would take disciplinary action against Ariyanethran, who is an ITAK member. Surenthiran said.

“We have not fielded a candidate to win the presidential election. We want to highlight the fact that the problems of the Tamils have not been addressed by successive governments. In the past, main candidates visited the north and east, acknowledged that the Tamils had a political problem, and promised to solve it but they reneged on their promises. We have voted for Sarath Fonseka, Maithripala Sirisena and Sajith Premadasa. The living standards of the north and east have not improved at all,” he said.

Fifteen years had elapsed since the conclusion of the war, but there was not a single factory in the north, he said. In 2022, the contribution of the Northern Province to the GDP had been 4.1 percent. The east contributed 5.2 percent that year, he said.