In a dramatic turn of events, detectives from the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) stormed the Batticaloa office of Sivanesathurai Chandrakanthan, better known as Pillayan, on Tuesday. Pillayan, leader of the Tamil Makkal Viduthalai Pulikal (TMVP) and a key figure in Sri Lanka’s political landscape, was engrossed in preparations for the upcoming local council elections when Chief Inspector Madhawa and a team of over ten officers descended upon his party headquarters.
The CID team arrested Pillayan and whisked him away to Colombo for questioning. The arrest is tied to the chilling 2006 abduction of Professor Subramaniam Raveendranath, a 74-year-old Tamil academic and former Vice Chancellor of the Eastern University of Sri Lanka. Raveendranath vanished after attending a conference in Colombo, with his last known movements traced to a mysterious phone call. His family fears the worst, suspecting he was murdered after enduring relentless death threats from a paramilitary group in the east.
On December 16, 2006, the Tamilnet website reported that Raveendranath had been forced to resign as Vice Chancellor following threats from the Karuna Group, a paramilitary faction notorious for its terror campaigns. Their report said, “S. Raveendranath, the Vice Chancellor of the Eastern University of Sri Lanka (EUSL), who was forced to resign his post recently following threats from the Karuna Group that abducted a Dean of the EUSL demanding the resignation of the Vice Chancellor, was reported missing since 1:30 p.m. Friday, Dehiwale Police in Colombo said. The VC was reported missing in a high-security area in Bauddhaloka Mawatha.
“Raveendranath, who was working at the University Grants Commission (UGC) where he had submitted his resignation, was on his way to attend a meeting of the Sri Lanka Association for the Advancement of Science (SLAAS) at Vidya Mawatha near Bauddhaloka Mawatha where he was last seen by his driver at 12:30 p.m. The Vice Chancellor had instructed his driver to come back at 2:00 p.m. when the meeting is over. The driver contacted the family as he could not get in touch with Raveendranath, family members have told media. A complaint was registered at the Police around 9:30 p.m. Friday.
“Raveendranath, (55), and father of two girls, was living in Colombo as his resignation was not accepted by the UGC. Raveendranath began his career in 1978 in Karadiyanarau at the Inst itute of Agriculture, and he was a founder-member of the (Eastern University of Sri Lanka) EUSL, founded in 1980. On 30 September, unidentified gunmen, widely believed to be from the Karuna group, came in a white van, kidnapped the Dean of Arts faculty at the EUSL, Dr. Bala Sugumar while he was at his Uppodai home in Batticaloa. The kidnappers had demanded the immediate resignation of the Vice Chancellor of EUSL, Dr. S. Raveendranath, before releasing Bala Sugumar. A senior lecturer at the Eastern University, Kumaravel Thambaiah, was shot and killed by the paramilitary group on 24 May 2004.”
Dr. Bala Sugumar, the Dean of Arts Faculty, was also abducted earlier that year, reportedly by armed men. He later claimed to have seen Raveendranath while blindfolded in a suspected safe house. Sugumar’s release was shrouded in mystery, with no clear details about his abductors. The TMVP leaders openly displayed their political power. Pillayan’s erstwhile leader, Karuna, created a sensation when he successfully entered the United Kingdom in 2007. A third-person note (TPN) from the government of Sri Lanka recommending a visa for him to travel to the UK was issued to the British High Commission. It transpired that the move was initiated by then Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa. The name on the passport was Kokila Gunawardena. This was found out whilst Karuna was in the UK.
As the CID delves deeper into this decades-old mystery, the question remains: will justice finally be served for Professor Raveendranath and his grieving family? The CID team comprised more than ten officers. When news spread about the arrest, groups in Batticaloa town lit crackers. Pillayan is now being questioned. It is yet to be determined how the CID will seek his remand custody after holding him for the legal period of 72 hours. There were moves yesterday to cover his arrest under the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA). Police Headquarters said in a statement on Tuesday that the arrest is linked to the alleged abduction of Professor Raveendranath in 2006. Sugumar claimed that when he was blindfolded, abducted and taken to a place which he suspected was a safe house, he saw Raveendranath. His family had told police they feared he had been killed. Whilst serving as Vice Chancellor, his family had told police that he received regular telephone calls threatening to kill him.
With a new deadline set by President Anura Kumara Dissanayake for laying bare the latest “conspiracy” surrounding the 2019 Easter Sunday massacres, the focus on Pillayan goes beyond his arrest for alleged abduction. Earlier, Cardinal Malcolm Ranjith, in an ultimatum to the government, warned that the Catholic Church would stage protests if there was no response by April 21, the sixth anniversary of the terror attacks, in keeping with the government’s pledge to reveal the masterminds of the Easter Sunday massacre. This was to take the form of a march from Colombo to the Katuwapitiya church in Negombo, one of the churches affected by attacks from Islamic terrorists. The result was a strong pledge by President Anura Kumara Dissanayake whilst addressing political rallies for the local council elections on May 6. He declared that the masterminds (maha mulakaru) would be exposed before April 21.
It is known that CID detectives have questioned Pillayan about the Easter Sunday massacres. That included the time when he served a sentence at the Batticaloa prison. He had denied accusations that he trained a group, also serving prison sentences, to carry out attacks on targets. As previously reported, CID detectives visited the Batticaloa prisons to interview officials and long-term inmates to ascertain whether they had any knowledge of the training or other plans. This has assumed significance after the arrest on Tuesday (on the same day Pillayan was taken in) of a police constable attached to the State Intelligence Service (SIS) for allegedly “misleading” investigators. This is in respect of the finding of a suspicious jacket near a culvert. It was after two police constables were found murdered in Vavunativu on November 30, 2018.
This is all over a contentious issue that has remained a finger-pointing battle between the Directorate of Military Intelligence (DMI) and the Criminal Investigation Department (CID). It relates to the killing of two police officers in Vavunativu, near Batticaloa, on November 30, 2018, and the contradictory positions of the Directorate of Military Intelligence (DMI) and the Criminal Investigation Department (CID). A committee that probed “intelligence co-ordination and investigative processes” about Easter Sunday massacres initiated by Ranil Wickremesinghe when president records the details of this episode. It said, “The committee observed that prior to the killings, there had been a conflict between the local Vavunativu police, and a person named Kadirgamar Thambi Rasakumar alias Kannan alias Ajanthan who had organised Maveerar (Great Heroes) celebrations on 27 November, 2018, in the Vavunativu Police area. The OIC of the Vavunativu Police has prohibited these celebrations and he had given permission to have muted celebrations (lighting lamps only), which had subsequently led to an altercation between the parties. Subsequently, the OIC of Vavunativu police had arrested Ajanthan on 3 December 2018 at 4.30 pm. The CID Director, Shani Abeysekera, has taken cognizance of this situation and subsequently sought a Detention Order over Ajanthan.”
The committee noted that “at the instigation of the Vavunativu OIC, the Kilinochchi Police had arrested Rasanayagam Sarvanandan alias Emiyavan, on the basis that he was also connected to Ajanthan. Thereafter, DIG CID Ravi Seneviratne had moved for a Detention Order against him. The CID strongly believed that the murder of the two policemen, for which two persons convicted are now serving a sentence, was carried out by the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE). “In this background, for the first time, the DMI had on 12th April 2019 informed the Senior DIG, CID that, in fact, Rilwan and Army Mohideen connected to the National Thawheed Jamath (NTJ) had conducted the killing of the police officers,” noted the committee.
Some of the more relevant findings of the committee over this ding-dong battle between the CID and the DMI are contained in the committee’s findings. Here is a selection:
Although the DMI professed that they did not believe the LTTE was behind the killing, it reflects that the DMI had considered the LTTE as the culprits; they have arrived at the position based on their informants.
Despite being aware of the NTJ’s activities since around 2015, SIS failed to share this critical information with the DMI. This lack of communication contributed to the delayed recognition of NTJ as a potential threat.
The CID had relied on the findings of the DMI and the information from the local police; they had also considered that an attack of such a scale could only be done by members connected to the LTTE.
The CID had failed to investigate the information which was at least shared on 12th April 2019 attributing the killings to the LTTE.
The committee noted that they reproach “the manner of the investigation by the CID where they have not exhibited due diligence in their investigations.” Then comes their recommendation, one that is being highly contested by government officials now dealing with issues. Here is what it said: “SDIG CID Ravi Seneviratne and Director, CID SSP Shani Abeyesekera, should be prosecuted by the relevant authority under the relevant provisions of the Penal Code for their negligence in conducting investigations.”
A top official said “those findings are too sweeping and do not correctly reflect the events that have taken place. There is more transpiring now. They will be revealed.” He, however, declined to elaborate. Be that as it may, the issue only relates to the two different contentious positions taken by the CID and the DMI. What of the larger issue, the Easter Sunday massacres itself. The question is about the ten-day deadline available to the government in terms of the ultimatum by Cardinal Malcolm Ranjith. Pillayan has been arrested for an alleged abduction. What of the others whom the government wants to identify as the masterminds—an issue that the Catholic Church believes is critical for them to call off protests. Will this come in the form of an official government statement or a string of arrests that could include big names?
That points to the question of who the masterminds were. The Sunday Times has seen a copy of the 71-page affidavit filed in a Los Angeles court by the head of the investigation team of the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) that probed the Easter Sunday massacres. This came because of the US government’s offer of assistance being accepted by Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka provided the FBI investigators with more than 700 electronic devices, such as mobile phones, laptops and cameras collected by the police during investigations.
Merrilee R. Goodwin, a Special Agent, who headed the FBI team has conducted investigations of federal criminal violations, including crimes of terrorism and crimes conducted outside the United States. He has participated in many investigations of criminal conduct committed by designated foreign terrorist organisations, such as the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (“ISIS”). He has been deployed overseas several times on behalf of the FBI to investigate terrorist attacks and crimes against United States nationals abroad. In that role, he has processed crime scenes, collected evidence, and conducted interviews. He has also worked closely with FBI Special Agent Bomb Technicians (“SABTs”) and received training in the construction and use of improvised explosive devices (“IEDs”). The affidavit was made in support of a criminal case against and arrest warrants for Mohamed Naufer, Mohamed Aswer Mohamed Riskan and Ahmed Milhan Hayathu Mohamed before US courts.
Dated November 12, 2020, the affidavit notes that “the attackers and their co-conspirators were members and supporters of ISIS and created a group, “ISIS in Sri Lanka,” more generally, as the “group,” that ISIS formally recognised as an ISIS affiliate operating in Sri Lanka. ISIS claimed responsibility for the attacks via its news agency, declaring that “Islamic State fighters” had “targeted citizens of coalition states and Christians in Sri Lanka.” ISIS also posted a picture and video of the attackers swearing allegiance (“bayat”) to ISIS’s then leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi (“al-Baghdadi”). Before detonating an IED that killed himself and scores of victims, Jahran Mohamed Cassim, also known as (“aka”) Mohamad Cassim Mohamad Zahran, aka Zahran Hashim (“Zahran”), was the mastermind behind the Easter Attacks and the self-proclaimed leader of ISIS in Sri Lanka. Zahran claimed to have communicated directly with ISIS leadership in Syria and obtained approval to operate as an ISIS affiliate. The group member swore bayat and trained and recruited new members using ISIS instruction materials that ISIS provided.”
The affidavit notes: Based on my investigation, my discussions with U.S. and Sri Lankan law enforcement officials, and open-source research, I know the following:
“On April 23, 2019, ISIS claimed responsibility for the Easter Attacks via its news outlet, the Amaq Agency (“Amaq”). ISIS claimed that the attacks were conducted by “Islamic State fighters” who had “targeted citizens of coalition states and Christians in Sri Lanka.” Also on April 23, 2019, Amaq posted a picture and a video of the attackers swearing allegiance to ISIS leader al-Baghdadi. Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, whose real name was Ibrahim Awad Ibrahim Ali al-Badri, was the founder and leader of the Islamic State (IS), also known as ISIS, who served as its first caliph from 2014 until his death in 2019. Zahran, the attacks’ mastermind, is visible unmasked in the centre of the group standing in front of the ISIS flag. Four of the attackers are brandishing knives.
On April 27, 2019, the day after the shootout in Sainthamaruthu, Amaq released a statement claiming that “17 members of the Sri Lankan Police were killed and wounded in an ambush prepared by Islamic State fighters. “Amaq’s reporting contradicted official reports that no police officers died during that shootout.
“On April 29, 2019, Amaq released a video of al Baghdadi in which he described the April 21, 2019, attacks as retaliation against “the West” for ISIS’s March 2019 defeat in Baghuz, Syria. Specifically, al-Baghdadi praised the “commando operations that unsettled the Crusaders in their Easter celebration to avenge their brothers in Baghuz,” and praised God that “among those killed were some Americans and Europeans.”
“The Attackers Manufacture and Deploy Nitrate-Based improvised explosive devices (IEDs). Based on my discussions with an FBI SABT who deployed to Sri Lanka and reviewed and collected physical evidence from attack sites (also referred to as blast sites) and safe houses, and my review of witness interviews, CCTV recordings, and forensic reports, I know the following:
An IED generally consists of three components: (1) an explosive; (2) a fusing system; and (3) a container. Explosives are reactive substances that can release large amounts of energy at varying speeds. IEDs manufactured with high explosives, meaning the explosives release energy at supersonic speeds, may contain multiple explosive materials within a single device referred to as primary, secondary, and in some cases, tertiary explosives. According to open-source information, the Battle of Baghuz Fawqani, which lasted from February 9, 2019, to March 23, 2019, marked the end of ISIS’s territorial occupation of Syrian lands and ISIS’s self-proclaimed “caliphate.”
Tertiary explosives, which are often added in bulk quantities, require a secondary explosive to initiate the tertiary material. A fusing system is a means or mechanism for initiating the explosive materials. A fusing system can be chemical, mechanical, or electrical in nature. Generally, an electrical fusing system consists of a power source (commonly a battery), a conductor (commonly electrical wires), an initiator (also called a detonator and often containing a primary explosive material), and a switch.
The FBI team probing the Easter Sunday massacres were allowed access to those arrested and remained in custody. One of them revealed how he procured approximately 1,900 detonators and 1300 water gel explosives for Zahran. The latter had told him that it was to be used for fishing. The FBI team also spoke to some of the ISIS in Lanka top rungers who ended up in CID custody. This is what the affidavit had to say about Mohamed Naufar, described as number two of the ISIS in Sri Lanka. “He is an ISIS member and supporter and served as ISIS in Sri Lanka’s “second emir” (means ruler or commander) or “Mujahedeen” is the plural form of “mujahid,” the Arabic term for one engaged in jihad, which literally means “struggle,” but is often used by Islamist terrorists and their supporters to refer to violence perpetrated against non-believers.
“Based on my training and experience, I know that Threema, Telegram, and WhatsApp are end-to-end encrypted messaging applications, meaning that the content of the messages is only accessible via the users’ digital devices and is not stored on the applications’ servers. Security-conscious users prefer these types of messaging applications because of the perceived security and anonymity end-to-end encryption offers users. Zahran tasked NAUFAR with leading the group’s propaganda and media efforts. In addition, NAUFAR recruited on behalf of ISIS and organised and led weapons, explosives, and ideology trainings. “NAUFAR’s Admissions to the FBI: On June 10, 11, and 26, 2019, and March 11, 2020, FBI special agents conducted recorded interviews of NAUFAR at CID headquarters in Colombo. NAUFAR made the following statements, among others:
a. NAUFAR Embraces ISIS Ideology and Aligns Himself with Zahran. In approximately 2009, while NAUFAR was living in Qatar, Zahran started a new organization, the National Thowheeth Jama’ath (“NTJ”). Zahran used the new organization to preach an extremist version of Islam.
b. In late 2015 or early 2016, NAUFAR began researching ISIS. NAUFAR initially disapproved of ISIS’s endorsement of violence against other Muslims and ISIS’s advocacy to destroy Saudi Arabia, where many Islamic holy sites were located.
c. In early 2017, Zahran gave a speech in Kattankudy, a town on Sri Lanka’s east coast, which was recorded and posted online. In that speech, Zahran defended ISIS as a legitimate organization.
d. According to NAUFAR, two events in 2017 solidified Zahran’s support for ISIS. After a public gathering Thowheeth Jama’ath (It means a “monotheistic organization” in Arabic) Zahran organised devolved into a violent conflict between Sufi Muslims and Zahran’s followers, Sri Lankan authorities arrested Zahran’s followers but not (according to NAUFAR) the Sufi Muslims. That same year, NAUFAR claimed that the Sri Lankan government failed to prevent Buddhist extremists from attacking Muslims, causing NAUFAR and others to believe that the Sri Lankan government was biased against Muslims.
e. In and after August 2017, Zahran showed NAUFAR ISIS videos, documents, and other information that led NAUFAR to embrace ISIS. NAUFAR formed an allegiance with Zahran and claimed to have joined ISIS at this time with the intention of committing suicide attacks.
f. ISIS Leaders Approve Zahran’s Group as Part of ISIS and NAUFAR is Named Second-in Command and Leads Firearms and Explosives Trainings In approximately 2014, A.N., a close associate of Zahran – travelled from Sri Lanka to Syria with his family members and lived in ISIS-controlled areas. One of A.N.’s family members, A.D., became an ISIS leader.
g. In late 2017 or early 2018, Zahran recorded a video of himself, NAUFAR, MILHAN, Hasthun (the St. Sebastian’s suicide bomber), Rilwan (Zahran’s brother who died in the April 26, 2019 shootout), and others. The group gathered in a Sri Lankan forest and, while holding firearms, pledged allegiance to ISIS and al-Baghdadi. Zahran, with Lateef’s assistance, sent the video to A.N. and A.D. in Syria. NAUFAR understood that A.N. and A.D. promised Zahran that the video would be delivered to al-Baghdadi. According to Zahran, because of the video, ISIS officially approved Zahran’s group as part of ISIS, with Zahran as the group’s leader or emir. Zahran appointed NAUFAR to be his “second-in-command” and the group’s media and propaganda officer.
h. Following ISIS’s official recognition of the group, now known as ISIS in Sri Lanka, Zahran told NAUFAR and others that ISIS leaders in Syria communicated directly with him using Telegram. Zahran said ISIS provided him ISIS materials, including a detailed training syllabus for the group’s members.
i. At ISIS and Zahran’s direction, NAUFAR organised approximately eight training courses for current and prospective members based on the materials ISIS provided. These multi-day courses were held in rented homes and were attended by between 15 and 25 students. The courses included instruction on ISIS ideology and firearms and explosives training.
j. Participants learned to operate a Type-56 rifle and 9-millimeter pistol and to make black powder explosives. NAUFAR, MILHAN, and Zahran were among the instructors. Hasthun served as an explosive expert, while Ilham (one of the Shangri-La suicide bombers) financed the group’s activities. During the courses, the group discussed targeting American interests overseas and attacking them. At the end of each course, the attendees swore allegiance to ISIS. Attendees were instructed not to bring their phones to the training courses, not to use their real names, and not to disclose personal information to the group.
Another revelation in the affidavit of the FBI lead investigator is how Zahran issued mobile phones to members of the ISIS in Sri Lanka. This is what it said:
Zahran distributed mobile phones to ISIS in Sri Lanka members, and between 2017 and his arrest, NAUFAR used approximately five phones Zahran provided. To further the group’s security, Hasthun swapped out the phones’ SIM cards every three to four months and directed the group to use the encrypted messaging applications Telegram and Threema.
“NAUFAR was told not to make telephone calls using the phones. NAUFAR claims to have broken ties with Zahran a month before the Easter attacks. He admits to being warned the morning of the attacks to flee. In early 2019, NAUFAR believed Zahran was to blame for the Sri Lankan authorities’ raid on the Puttalam estate, because Zahran had disregarded the group’s security protocols and used his mobile phone and the landline at the Puttalam estate to make and receive calls. On March 7, 2019 — a little over a month before the Easter Attacks — NAUFAR and others confronted Zahran, who agreed to resign as leader of the group.
“The following day, however, Zahran rescinded his resignation and claimed that ISIS officials in Syria should be consulted before any leadership change.
A rift developed between Zahran and NAUFAR. NAUFAR claimed that he last had direct contact with Zahran on March 9, 2019. NAUFAR stated that he attempted to reconcile with Zahran, but Zahran rejected NAUFAR’s overtures. In the days leading up to the attack, NAUFAR and his supporters hid at a safe house in Wattala, a large suburb of Colombo. Zahran at the time, travelled to the Wattala safe house to speak with NAUFAR and his supporters.”
Interestingly there is also a reference to the November 28, 2018, killing of two policemen in Vavunativu, one over which the CID and DMI are feuding. “One officer was stabbed 41 times whilst the other was shot in the head and back with a T-56 rifle,” the FBI reveals. Co-conspirator 1, it added is an “ISIS in Sri Lanka member” and participated in the murders. It said that FBI special agents interviewed “co-onspirator 1 at CID headquarters…”
The events recounted here and elsewhere, no doubt, will add further significance to the arrests or a statement the government will make within the next seven days from today (April 13). There is now greater responsibility, particularly on the part of the two main investigators, Ravi Seneviratne, Secretary to the Ministry of Public Security, and Shani Abeysekera, soon to be a DIG. Both are among those who have come in for strong criticism in the aftermath of the Easter Sunday massacres for their official roles. They have an unenviable task—adduce proof both domestically and nationally on who the perpetrators of the Easter Sunday massacres are from the probe they are conducting six years later. If it is anything different from what has been found and already known, new evidence to prove them becomes a sine qua non. It is a make-or-break situation.
