More Sri Lankans recommended for target sanctions: ITJP says after UK’s action

More Sri Lankans who are alleged of human rights violations and corruption have been recommended for target sanctions from the United States, United Kingdom, and Europe countries, the International Truth and Justice Project (ITJP) said.

A source from the ITJP said the human rights body has “submitted more information and names for other governments” for actions.

The UK on Monday imposed sanctions on four key Sri Lankans who played pivotal roles in the island nation’s 26-year civil war between the government military and Tamil Tiger rebels who are popularly known as Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) after the recommendations by the ITJP.

The UK imposed travel sanctions on former Commanders of Sri Lanka Army Shavendra Silva and Jagath Jayasuriya, former Navy Commander Wasantha Karannagoda, and former military commander of LTTE terrorist group Vinayagamoorthy Muralitharan, popularly known as Karuna Amman,

The sanctions are aimed at seeking accountability for serious human rights violations and abuses, committed during the civil war, and to prevent a culture of impunity.

The measures, which include UK travel bans and asset freezes, target individuals responsible for a range of violations and abuses, such as extrajudicial killings, during the civil war, the UK Foreign office said in a statement.

“The UK government is committed to human rights in Sri Lanka, including seeking accountability for human rights violations and abuses which took place during the civil war, and which continue to have an impact on communities today,” Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, David Lammy, said in the statement.

“The UK government looks forward to working with the new Sri Lankan government to improve human rights in Sri Lanka, and welcomes their commitments on national unity.”

Continuous Push for Justice

The ITJP is a human rights organization that focuses on accountability for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and human rights violations, particularly in Sri Lanka. It was established to document abuses that occurred during and after Sri Lanka’s civil war (1983–2009), with a focus on seeking justice for victims of enforced disappearances, torture, sexual violence, and extrajudicial killings.

In December, ITJP said it had submitted more than 60 sanctions and visa ban requests against Sri Lankan public and security officials to date as well as a series of universal jurisdiction cases.

These requests have been sent to the Governments of the US, UK, Australia, Canada and the EU as well as the UN.

The submissions cover gross violations of human rights and significant corruption in respect of the Sri Lankan army, navy, air force, police and intelligence officials, Tamil paramilitaries, as well as civil servants including judges and former ministers.

The ITJP’s submissions have covered gross violations of human rights and significant corruption in respect of the Sri Lankan army, navy, air force, police and intelligence officials, Tamil paramilitaries, as well as civil servants including judges and former ministers.

The South Africa-based independent, international, non-profit organisation, however, has not mentioned the names of the officials and people in its submission list.

In December, the US State Department imposed travel bans on Sri Lanka’s ex-envoy to Russia, Udayanga Weeratunga and former Sri Lankan Airlines chief executive Kapila Chandrasena among 14.

Both Weeratunga and Chandrasena are facing allegations of corruption. Weeratunga is facing court case against MiG fighter get deal in Ukraine, while Chandrasena has been accused of corrupt Airbus deal.

The ITJP has been collecting testimonies from survivors, whistleblowers, and former members of security forces to provide evidence of war crimes and ongoing violations. It also has been working with international legal bodies to push for accountability, including supporting cases under universal jurisdiction in different countries.

The ITJP, led by Yasmin Sooka, a South African human rights lawyer and former member of the UN Panel of Experts on Sri Lanka, who played a key role in highlighting alleged war crimes committed by Sri Lankan security forces and advocating for international justice mechanisms.

New Govt Yet to Respond

President Anura Kumara Dissanayake’s new government is yet to respond on the UK’s decision for target sanctions on the three top military officials and the LTTE breakaway leader who worked with the state military to defeat the rebels in the final war.

Since the end of the war in 2009, Sri Lanka has strongly rejected any human rights violation and said it had maintained zero casualties in its final war.

However, ITJP said the submissions looked at state-owned enterprises and misappropriation of public funds that resulted in huge financial losses for the entire country, and contributed to the economic crisis in the country.

The United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) passed a resolution in March 2021 that has given a mandate for the global body to establish a mechanism to gather evidence outside the country over alleged human rights violations during and after a 26-year war that ended in 2009.

The resolution has allowed the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) “to collect, consolidate, analyse and preserve information and evidence and to develop possible strategies for future accountability processes for gross violations of human rights or serious violations of international humanitarian law in Sri Lanka.

It is also expected to advocate for victims and survivors, and to support relevant judicial and other proceedings, including in the member states, “with competent jurisdiction”.

External Mechanism

A Sectoral Oversight Committee on National Security in the last parliament summoned representatives of the country’s Foreign Ministry, Defence Ministry, chief of all three forces, and attorney general to review external mechanisms that have been established as per the UN resolution on evidence gathering mechanism.

The Committee has said in line with the mechanism, legal cases can be filed in different countries under international jurisdictions against the military leaders and those officials who gave orders to the military.

The committee expressed its concerns over any legal actions by various countries against those involved could lead to prosecute Sri Lanka’s military and political leaders at the International Court of Justice ( ICJ) and International Criminal Court (ICC).

The US has imposed a travel ban on General Silva and his immediate family members, Navy intelligence officer Chandana Prasad Hettiarachchi, Army Staff Sergeant Sunil Ratnayake, army officer Prabath Bulathwatta, and former Navy chief Wasantha Karannagoda, citing human rights violations.

Travel bans have already been imposed by the US on senior retired military leader Shagi Gallage and the former defence secretary Kamal Gunaratne as well, the previous government has admitted.

Canada in 2023 imposed financial sanctions to freeze the assets of former Sri Lankan presidents Mahinda Rajapaksa and his brother Gotabaya Rajapaksa, citing rights abuses.

Some top Sri Lankan military officials have been deprived of taking part in lucrative UN Peacekeeping Missions due to human rights allegations during the war.

Junior Rajapaksa Responds

Responding to UK’s sanctions, Namal Rajapaksa, the eldest son of former president Mahinda Rajapaksa and an opposition Sri Lankan legislator blamed the West claiming it was selectively targeting Sri Lanka’s war veterans while ignoring those who funded and justified LTTE brutality.

“The latest UK sanctions aren’t about human rights—they’re the result of relentless LTTE-backed lobbying, manipulating foreign governments to act against those who brought lasting peace,” he tweeted.

“These sanctions will lower the morale of our forces, and if another crisis arises, they may lack the courage to fight if we don’t support them now.”

Namal Rajapaksa also has faced US travel sanctions in 2018 over a court case related to corruption.

Human rights analysts say some Sri Lankan political and military leaders are still unaware that they have been blacklisted by Western nations for rights abuses and will only become aware of such measures when they request visas from these countries.

The Rajapaksas and military leaders have denied any wrongdoing, and successive governments have rejected an independent international investigation into alleged human rights violations, citing infringement on the country’s sovereignty.

How to Remove the IGP from Office – Everything You Need to Know

The government today (25 March) handed over a motion to the Speaker to remove Inspector General of Police (IGP) Deshabandu Tennakoon from office.

Tennakoon is currently in remand over a case related to a shooting incident near the W15 hotel in Weligama. He has been suspended from his duties as IGP by the Supreme Court since July last year, but he remains the official IGP. Senior DIG Priyantha Weerasooriya has been serving as Acting IGP in his place.

The National Police Commission does not have the authority to interdict the IGP. Since the position is appointed by the Constitutional Council (CC) on the President’s recommendation, disciplinary action against the IGP falls under the jurisdiction of the President and the CC. However, his removal requires an impeachment motion to be presented in Parliament.

The removal of an IGP must follow the procedure outlined in the Removal of Officers (Procedure) Act, No. 5 of 2002, which was certified on 26 March 2002. This Act establishes a structured and transparent process for the dismissal of high-ranking officials, including the IGP. It was published as a supplement to the Gazette on 27 March 2002 and aims to ensure accountability and due process for officers appointed to key positions listed in Part II of the Schedule to Article 41C of the Constitution.

Grounds for Removal

The Act specifies eight grounds on which the IGP may be removed from office:

1.Insolvency – Being adjudged insolvent by a competent court.
2.Ill Health – Being unfit to continue due to physical or mental infirmity.
3.Criminal Conviction – Conviction for an offence involving moral turpitude, treason, or bribery.
4.Misconduct or Corruption – Being found guilty of such acts.
5.Abuse of Power – Gross misuse of authority.
6.Neglect of Duty – Significant failure to perform responsibilities.
7.Partiality – Displaying gross bias in office.
8.Loss of Citizenship – Ceasing to be a citizen of Sri Lanka.

These grounds are categorised into two procedural tracks based on their nature and severity. Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized

TRCSL denies suspension of ‘Starlink’ satellite broadband service

The Telecommunications Regulatory Commission of Sri Lanka (TRCSL) has dismissed media reports claiming it has decided to suspend the ‘Starlink’ satellite broadband service, which has been planned to be implemented in the country.

According to the Director General of TRCSL Bandula Herath, a dashboard system is required to carry out the necessary regulations for providing this service. However, there has been some delay in bringing in this system to the country, he said.

He stated that the ‘Starlink’ satellite broadband service is expected to become operational in April, as soon as the necessary systems are in place.

Speaking further, the Director General affirmed, “I can say with responsibility that the service provided by that company will not be stopped. The service is scheduled to be available in our country by April.”

He also highlighted that, “they provide a dashboard to properly regulate the service they offer, to ensure that the required service is being delivered correctly to the customers, and to regulate the country’s national security. Through this, we can regulate both issues effectively.”

UK sanctions several responsible for HR violations and abuses during Sri Lankan civil war

The UK yesterday sanctioned figures responsible for serious human rights violations and abuses during the civil war in Sri Lanka.

The UK said sanctions have been imposed on former Sri Lankan commanders and an ex-Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) commander responsible for serious human rights violations and abuses during the civil war and said sanctions aim to seek accountability for serious human rights violations and abuses committed during the civil war and prevent a culture of impunity.

The UK Government has imposed sanctions on four individuals responsible for serious human rights abuses and violations during the Sri Lankan civil war, including extrajudicial killings, torture, and/or perpetration of sexual violence.

The individuals sanctioned by the UK include former senior Sri Lankan military commanders and a former LTTE military commander who later led the paramilitary Karuna Group, operating on behalf of the Sri Lankan military against the LTTE.

Those sanctioned are: former Head of Sri Lankan Armed Forces Shavendra Silva, former Navy Commander Wasantha Karannagoda, former Sri Lanka Army Commander Jagath Jayasuriya, and former military Commander of the terrorist group LTTE Vinayagamoorthy Muralitharan. Also known as Karuna Amman, he subsequently created and led the paramilitary Karuna Group, which worked on behalf of the Sri Lanka Army.

The measures, which include UK travel bans and asset freezes, target individuals responsible for a range of violations and abuses, such as extrajudicial killings, during the civil war.

Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs State Secretary David Lammy said: The UK Government is committed to human rights in Sri Lanka, including seeking accountability for human rights violations and abuses which took place during the civil war, and which continue to have an impact on communities today. I made a commitment during the election campaign to ensure those responsible are not allowed impunity. This decision ensures that those responsible for past human rights violations and abuses are held accountable.”

“The UK Government looks forward to working with the new Sri Lankan Government to improve human rights in Sri Lanka, and welcomes their commitments to national unity,” Lammy added.

During her January visit to Sri Lanka, Minister for the Indo-Pacific MP Catherine West held constructive discussions on human rights with the Prime Minister, Foreign Minister, civil society organisations, as well as political leaders in the north of Sri Lanka.

UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office said for communities to move forward together, there must be acknowledgement and accountability for past wrongdoing, which the sanctions listings introduced today will support.

“We want all Sri Lankan communities to be able to grow and prosper. The UK remains committed to working constructively with the Sri Lankan Government on human rights improvements as well as their broader reform agenda including economic growth and stability. As part of our Plan for Change, the UK recognises that promoting stability overseas is good for our national security,” it added.

The UK has long led international efforts to promote accountability in Sri Lanka alongside partners in the Core Group on Sri Lanka at the UN Human Rights Council, which includes Canada, Malawi, Montenegro, and North Macedonia.

The UK has supported Sri Lanka’s economic reform through the International Monetary Fund (IMF) program, supporting debt restructuring as a member of Sri Lanka’s Official Creditor Committee and providing technical assistance to Sri Lanka’s Inland Revenue Department.

The UK and Sri Lanka share strong cultural, economic, and people-to-people ties, including through their educational systems. The UK has widened educational access in Sri Lanka through the British Council on English language training and work on transnational education to offer internationally accredited qualifications.

Posted in Uncategorized

Over 3,000 Observers to Be Deployed for 2025 Local Government Elections

The People’s Action for Free and Fair Elections (PAFFREL) says that over 3,000 observers will be deployed for the 2025 local government elections.

PAFFREL Executive Director Rohana Hettiarachchi stated that 160 officers, one per electoral constituency, have already been assigned for the observation process.

The Executive Director of this election monitoring initiative is Manjula Gajanayake.

The 2025 local government elections are scheduled to be held on May 6.

Meanwhile, the Election Commission says the expenditure limit for candidates will be gazetted next week.

Posted in Uncategorized

The Dark Legacy of Batalanda: How High-Level Officials Allowed Torture and Abuse at a Government Housing Complex

In 1995, shortly after Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga came to power, she ordered the establishment of the Batalaanda Commission of Inquiry on September 21st to investigate the infamous Batalaanda incidents.

The commission was tasked with probing the illegal detention, torture, murder, and disappearance of young individuals in the Batalaanda Housing Scheme in Biyagama, a property which was under the purview of the State Fertilizer Manufacturing Corporation.

Today, we delve into some of the commission’s key findings regarding the events that transpired at the Batalaanda Housing Complex between 1988 and 1990.

What Did the Batalanda Commission Uncover?

The commission’s report underscores that several houses within the Batalaanda Housing Complex were used for illegal detention and torture during the period between January 1, 1988, and December 31, 1990.

The complex was under the purview of the State Fertilizer Manufacturing Corporation at the time, which was under the Ministry of Industries.

Ranil Wickremesinghe, then the Minister of Industries, played a pivotal role in this dark chapter of Sri Lanka’s history.

The commission’s findings revealed that Ranil Wickremesinghe instructed officials from the State Fertilizer Manufacturing Corporation to allocate and release houses in the Batalaanda Housing Scheme to police officers from the Kelaniya Police Division.

Key houses in the complex, including A 2/2, A 2/1, A 2/3, A 1/7, B 2, B 1, and B 7, were assigned for use by these officers.

The commission discovered that several of these houses were used by a police unit led by Douglas Peiris, the Officer-in-Charge of the Peliyagoda Police Station.

13 houses were also allocated to the Kelaniya Anti-Subversive Operations Unit.

Shockingly, one of these houses was even designated as Ranil Wickremesinghe’s personal office.

The commission found that Ranil Wickremesinghe had abused his ministerial authority by facilitating the unlawful occupation of houses in the Batalaanda Housing Complex.

Police officers from the Kelaniya Police Division, fully aware of the illegal activities occurring within the complex, violated departmental regulations in occupying these homes.

The commission identified 15 police officers including Assistant Superintendent of Police Douglas Peiris, Chief Inspector of Police Ranjith Wickramasinghe, and Senior Superintendent of Police Nalin Delgoda.

The commission also criticized Deputy Inspector General of Police Merrill Gunaratne for his failure to take action, allowing the illegal occupancy of the Batalaanda Housing Complex to continue unchecked.

The commission accused Senior Superintendent of Police Nalin Delgoda of intentionally failing to prevent these houses from being used for unlawful purposes.

The commission identified 13 officers directly responsibile for the illegal detention and torture of individuals including:

Assistant Superintendent of Police Douglas Peiris
Chief Inspector of Police Ranjith Wickramasinghe
Police Sergeant Ratnayake
Police Sergeant Ranatunga
Sub-Inspector of Police Delgahagoda
Police Sergeant Upali Lakhewa
Police Constable Driver Ranjith
Police Constable Jayawardena
Police Constable Heenbanda
Police Sergeant Kappagoda
Police Constable Padmini Premalatha
Police Constable Lakshman
Police Inspector Sunil Bandara Nissanka

What was Ranil Wickremesinghe’s role in this?

The commission’s findings expose that police meetings held at the Batalaanda Housing Complex during this period were explicitly unauthorized by the Ministry of Defense.

Yet, Ranil Wickremesinghe, then the Minister of Industries, took it upon himself to chair these meetings, even though he had no legal authority to do so.

Ranil Wickremesinghe personally instructed the liquidator of the State Fertilizer Manufacturing Corporation to set up illegal detention centres in houses within the complex, including B2, B8, B34, and A1/8.

The report also names Assistant Superintendent of Police Douglas Peiris and Chief Inspector of Police Ranjith Wickramasinghe as the ones who set up and ran these illegal detention centres, where people were tortured and mistreated.

The Commission clearly states that then Inspector General of Police, Ernest Perera, knew exactly what was happening but chose to do nothing about it.

Why was nothing done to stop these brutal acts in a government-owned housing complex?

Who truly benefited from these horrific actions, and why did they go unpunished for so long?

Should we allow these crimes to be buried in the past as if they never happened?

Or is it time to face the truth?

Source:News First

Posted in Uncategorized

Coral colonizes Sri Lanka’s China-backed Hambantota port

Coral colonies have started to grow across Sri Lanka’s Hambantota port which are now being nurtured and studied through a research project, its China-backed operating company said.

The port said eco-conscious policies of being a ‘green port’ has provided a sanctuary for the natural growth of different species of coral along the port’s breakwaters and on the artificial island.

The port was dug out of dry land and later flooded with sea water. The artificial island was built out of excavated material.

“This project originates from the ecosystem nurtured by Hambantota International Port. Several thriving coral colonies have developed within the port’s channel and basin,” Wilson Qu, chief executive of Hambantota International Port group said in a statement.

“Recently, we decided that it wasn’t enough to simply foster this natural growth—we also needed to investigate the phenomenon scientifically.”

The green port concept minimises the port’s ecological footprint while striking a balance between industrial activity and environmental preservation.

Under the Coral Reef Protection Project, the Ocean University of Sri Lanka (OCUSL), will conduct a comprehensive baseline study to assess coral cover, species diversity, and the presence of various marine organisms, such as fish, invertebrates and algae.

Corals are invertebrates but the polyps contributing reef building have a calcium carbonate (limestone) external skeleton. Some of the corals get their colours of algae growing on their surface. Soft corals are anemones without skeletons.

M.F.M. Fairoz, Senior Lecturer of the Faculty of Fisheries and Ocean Science at OCUSL, will lead the monitoring efforts, conducting research over the next five months, HIP said.

“Our research aims to evaluate the current state of coral cover and species diversity,” Fairoz said in the statement.

“We also seek to establish a baseline for future monitoring that will help us understand ecological balance and provide insights into global coral conservation and restoration initiatives.”

“It provides university students with hands-on experience in marine biology and marine conservation, allowing them to participate in fieldwork and data analysis that will enhance their practical skills while contributing to cutting-edge marine research.”

The Hambantota port has released pictures showing what appears to be lettuce leaf coral, staghorn coral and small formations brain grooved coral, where some species of fish are seen swimming.

Among requirements for some types of corals is to be protected from strong wave action.

The study will also evaluate sea water quality, macroalgae growth, with the ultimate goal of assessing the health of coral ecosystems and their potential as models for future conservation and restoration efforts.

Hambantota International Port has initially allocated 1.2 million rupees for the first phase of the project, Jeevan Premasara – Senior General Manager HR and Admin said.

The first phase will be completed in May 2025.

GR’s Jaffna case to be next heard on July 30

The Appeal Court last week (18) set a date for July 30 to review of a petition seeking the annulment of an order previously issued by the court that prevented the summoning of former President Gotabaya Rajapaksa as a witness in the case regarding the disappearance of social activists Lalith Weeraraj and Kugun Muruganandan.

The case is currently being heard at the Jaffna Court.

The petition, filed by the association of relatives of missing persons during the war, seeks a fresh order compelling Rajapaksa to appear as a witness. Lalith Weeraraj and Kugun Muruganandan went missing on December 9, 2011, and the case is being heard in connection with their abduction. Rajapaksa, who was then Defence Secretary, was previously summoned to testify in the Jaffna Court in relation to the case.

Rajapaksa challenged the summons, citing security concerns, and an appeal filed in the Appeal Court resulted in dismissing the order, preventing him from appearing in court. The new petition aims to overturn this decision, as Rajapaksa is no longer serving as president.

The case involves the abduction of Lalith and Kugun, two activists who disappeared in Jaffna in 2011. The relatives of the missing persons are pushing for the court to compel Rajapaksa to testify, arguing that he is no longer protected by the previous ruling, which had prevented him from being summoned while in office.

Nominations of major Tamil parties among those rejected in Jaffna

Several political parties are to seek court intervention in Jaffna due to the confusion in accepting the nominations for the upcoming Local Government Elections 2025.

According to the Returning Officer, Jaffna District Mr.Maruthalingam Pratheepan, 148 parties and 27 independent groups handed over the nominations in Jaffna District and among them, 136 party nominations and 10 Independent groups were rejected due to various reasons.

This created a tense atmosphere near the District Secretariat. Former parliamentarian and the spokesperson of Democratic Tamil National Alliance (DTNA) Mr.Suresh Premachandran stated to the media that the rejection of their nominations (09 nomination of the DTNA rejected) are unacceptable, and they are preparing to file a case against the Jaffna election office and the returning offices in the high court.

Meanwhile, an independent group headed by Gnanapragasam Sulaxan also said they would seek court justice against the rejection.

The party ‘Tamil Makkal Thesiya Koottani’, headed by former parliamentarian C.V.Vigneswaran also rejected in the Jaffna municipal Council due to a signature issue. The mayor candidate of the party and the former Jaffna Municipal Council Mayor Mr.V.Manivannan also confirmed that they’ll file a case against the procedure of accepting the nominations.

The nomination of All Ceylon Tamil Congress headed by parliamentarian Gajendrakumar Ponnambalam for Nallur Urban Council, and Point Pedro Pradeshiya Sabha in Jaffna were rejected and they are also expected to go for legal action. For Nallur, the list was cancelled because a female candidate had placed her signature only without mentioning the name.

Parliamentarian Archchuna Ramanathan’s 10 independent groups among 11 submissions have been rejected, and they’re not sure about the next course of action.

However, the returning officer Mr.Maruthalingam Pratheepan stated to the media that they followed the regulations and circular instructions of the Elections Commission and rejected accordingly.

Posted in Uncategorized