Corruption Costs Sri Lanka Billions—Funds That Could Save Lives : UNDP

The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) has issued a stark warning about the scale of corruption in Sri Lanka’s revenue administration, estimating annual losses of approximately Rs. 72 billion.

Speaking at the launch of a new anti-corruption initiative, Azusa Kubota, UNDP Resident Representative in Sri Lanka, emphasized that these losses represent funds that could otherwise be invested in the country’s health, education, infrastructure, and essential public services.

“Public distrust and administrative inefficiencies have severely limited tax compliance,” Kubota said. “By restoring credibility, we can expand the tax base and strengthen public financing in a more equitable and sustainable manner.”

The newly launched project builds on years of collaboration between UNDP and Sri Lanka, particularly in the area of tax policy reform. A key focus of the initiative is the operationalisation of internal affairs units (IAUs) across more than 100 public institutions. These units are designed to detect, manage, and respond to corruption risks from within, promoting a culture of preventive governance.

“Empowering IAUs will enhance public sector integrity from the inside out,” Kubota noted, adding that institutional accountability is essential for long-term development and public trust.

Posted in Uncategorized

China shares new development opportunities with South Asian nations: Sri Lankan Minister

China is sharing new development opportunities with South Asian countries and is committed to achieving win-win outcomes, said Wasantha Samarasinghe, Sri Lankan minister of trade, commerce, food security and cooperative development.

Samarasinghe made the remarks in an interview with Xinhua after returning to Colombo from the 9th China-South Asia Expo in Kunming, south China’s Yunnan Province.

The minister noted that the expo fully demonstrated China’s achievements in economic development, scientific and technological innovation, and technological transformation.

As the theme country for the expo this year, Sri Lanka highly values cooperation opportunities with China and looks forward to learning from China’s development experience and further deepening bilateral economic and trade relations.

“This is my eighth visit to China since 2005. Over these 20 years, there is a big difference and big development in China’s economy, cities, and people’s living standards,” Samarasinghe said.

He added that while achieving its own development, China has steadfastly advanced high-level opening-up, continuously injecting stability and certainty into the world economy. There is no other country like China that has provided such important development opportunities for the entire South Asia, he said.

Samarasinghe specifically highlighted the 8th meeting of the China-Sri Lanka Joint Committee for Economic and Trade Cooperation held in Colombo, where both sides signed a memorandum of understanding on strengthening economic cooperation in industrial and supply chains.

“Time to time, the world is going here and there. In this situation, the stability of industrial and supply chains is crucial,” said the official.

Deepening alignment with China’s industrial and supply chains will help enhance Sri Lanka’s capacity building and create significant development opportunities in industry, technology, business, and infrastructure, he said.

Samarasinghe said Sri Lanka, with its geographical advantage in a crucial position along Indian Ocean shipping routes, will gain new opportunities by deepening cooperation with China.

“We have a good traditional friendship with China,” he said, concluding with the wish to continue expanding bilateral investment and economic and trade cooperation and creating more benefits for the people of both countries.

Source: Xinhua

What next from the UNHRC? By N Sathiya Moorthy

Reading between the lines, the visiting UNHRC chief’s Volker Türk’s message was that the Government should take (back) the ownership of the accountability mechanisms — and make it credible and functional. It is a significant departure from the past position of the human rights affiliate of the UN system, which had always insisted on ‘independent investigations’, ever since the UNHRC began passing periodic resolutions and thus strictures over allegations of war-crimes and accountability issues.

It is still anybody’s guess what the visitor had in mind – or, if he, too, wanted Colombo to work with international experts in the matter. But in eastern Trincomalee, he did say that it was for the Government to make things work. What shape his balanced and diplomatically vague observations, in Trincomalee, Jaffna and finally in Colombo, when the Human Rights Council started on a fresh resolution on the matter, after the previous one had run out its three-year term.

Already, the Core Group founded by the US years back and now loosely headed by the UK has come out relatively harsh on Sri Lanka for not doing enough – something that High Commissioner Türk too could be interpreted to have said while in the country. It can be argued that the visitor kept it vague because he did not want to be harsh while on his maiden visit to the country as the UNHRC boss, the first one to visit Sri Lanka after 2016.

The answer for that doubt / question will be known only when Türk’s report on his visit is presented to the Human Rights Council subsequently. It will show if he and his office were with the Sri Lanka and Sri Lankans. Rather, it will show if he and his office were with the Core Group, whose aim and objective was to ‘fix’ (past) Government(s) on war-crimes and accountability issues.

‘Anaiya Vilakku’

Yet, in and on Chemmani in the North, where the High Commissioner visited a grave-site, where court-ordered digging is progressing in instalments, he was forthright. He appreciated the space for ‘memorialisation’ of the dead, which he too implied was not available under previous regimes, post-war. The Chemmani visit was a late addition to his Jaffna itinerary, pressured as he was by human rights groups of the Tamils and those in Colombo.

It was shocking or moving or shockingly moving to see the picture of a mother clutching her infant in one of the dug-up graves. Both were in skeletal form. There were others, too, both adults and children. Definitely, they were not the ‘child soldiers’ of the LTTE, which was a well-known and well-established fact.

It was sad that some miscreants from within the Tamil polity embarrassed the apolitical organisers of a three-day memorial lamp-rites at the Chemmani site through their antics. In Tamil, it reads as ‘Anaiya Vilakku’ protest.

It is also true that despite the hype and social media publicity given to the hurriedly-organised memorial, aimed at attracting the UNHRC chief’s attention, it did not draw as much crowds as should have been the case. It would have been the case in a bygone era, but not anymore. The new-generation Tamil youth have been repeatedly demonstrating in every anti-government protest organised by their much-divided political leaders, and the so-called civil society.

Yet, on the Chemmani finds, High Commissioner Türk said that it needed renowned forensic experts to dig deeper into the past events (to fix accountability?). There was no clarity if like the Tamil victims of the war, he too believed prima facie that the armed forces had brutally killed and buried those innocent infants and children, along with their mothers, parents and others.

In Colombo later, he shared his experience with a mother in the South, who reportedly said that she was still searching for her dear ones since the eighties – and that she could identify with those similarly placed people in the Tamil areas.

Was the High Commissioner too alluding to Sinhala victims of the ‘Second JVP insurgency’? Whether or not, he did not explain if the missing person was a JVP cadre, possibly done to death by the armed forces along with an estimated 60,000-plus Sinhala-Buddhist youth – or, to a victim of JVP’s violence of the time.

Tanzanian definition

Yet, the High Commissioner’s Sri Lanka visit was not without positive outcomes. In meetings with government leaders, which included President Anura Kumara Dissanayake, Prime Minister Harini Amarasuriya and Foreign Minister Vijitha Herath, the High Commissioner was given an assurance about the inevitability of scrapping the controversial Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA).

Previous governments had done it too, but under a new regime that had no association with the politico-administrative past, it sounded more credible and reliable. Simultaneously, of course, the government was discussing a new PTA with UN experts. Reports said that the Tanzanian definition of ‘terrorism’ was under consideration.

At a time when the UN, too, is grappling with a definitive definition for the term, in Tanzania, terrorism is defined as acts intended to seriously intimidate a population, unduly compel a government or international organization, or destabilize fundamental political, constitutional, economic, or social structures. These acts can involve violence against persons, damage to property, endangering life, or creating serious public health or safety risks. A 2002 PTA in Tanzania also gives a broad list of examples.

Creature of the West

As an institution, the UNHRC is a creature and creation of the ‘international community’ (read: West), not just to fix rights-offending member-States. It was also a tool for them to circumvent the UN Security Council, where again the five permanent members with veto-power cast their lot, not on matters of facts but of international politics, as evolving at the time. The UNHRC fitted their bill, fine.

Hence, from the very appointment of a High Commissioner for Human Rights, resolutions and everything else concerning the UNHRC are part of international politics, in the name of international human rights. The result is there for everyone to see. The Sinhala side and the Sri Lankan State feels the pinch and the pressure. The Tamil victims, despite the decade-plus involvement of the UNHRC, have not seen the promised ‘closure’ anywhere near them than would have been without the UNHRC.

Thus, motives would have been read into High Commissioner Türk not giving time to meet army veterans who wanted to complain against what they considered as the unjustified ‘sanctions’ imposed by the US, the UK and a few other nations on their colleagues from the past. It is anybody’s guess what the UNHRC could do to interfere with individual decisions of sovereign governments – or, if it ever wanted to address that side of the nation’s violent past.

They have been arguing that during the time these ‘sanctioned’ commanders (and political leaders) were charged with committing ‘war crimes’ and worse, the dreaded LTTE had branch offices in their cities. As they have been recalling at every turn, the LTTE was also using these branches also for coordinating terrorist acts and battles, back home in the Tamil North and East.

Yet, Türk did not visit the Mullivaikkal venue of the end-game of the ethnic war, as some Diaspora Tamil groups had urged him. Reports claimed that the government had no problems if he visited even the very site where the armed forces shot and killed LTTE leader Velupillai Prbhakaran.

If so, it’s saying a lot about the de-politicisation of accountability issues under the JVP-NPP regime – as they at least would want the world to see it. Or, is it politicisation of another kind? Whatever that be, this government, like those before it, cannot be seen as sacrificing the personal safety and security of individual veterans at the altar of political expediency of a different kind.

It is heartening to note that there are still sane voices that keep cautioning the Government against ‘triumphalism’ from the war era. Those like veteran politician Milinda Moragoda need to do more to be seen, heard and acted upon. Others of the ilk need to convince the Sri Lankan State that they are not ‘stooges of the West’ – which tag they are unable to get rid of, not that they have tried hard or hard enough.

Pound of flesh

It is one thing for the Government to work for another ‘consensus resolution’ at the UNHRC this time, like the reformist ‘Yahapalanaya’ regime did after assuming office – after defeating incumbent war-victorious President, Mahinda Rajapaksa in 2015. If the Core Group proposes it, or concedes it, it could ease the international situation for this Government, as the nation is still dependent on the IMF doles for sustenance. Or, that is the perception.

But it is not the same as the Government getting to be seen as exposing war veterans to the waiting ranks of international investigators, who are queuing up for their own pound of flesh. The upcoming UNHRC session, thus, promises to be as easy as it can be for the present Government. It can also be as difficult as it was for past Governments – at least occasionally.

But then, they all remembered that at the end of the day, they had to come back home to face successive elections, to be able to retain power for another term. In that milieu, international human rights law and best practices do not. Instilling a sense of safety, yes, in the minds of those who had fought a long war, matters the most.

It is another matter that the idea of ‘inclusivity’ in terms of victimisation and victimhood attaching to the Tamil victims of the ethnic war has penetrated through the echelons of Government leadership, both political and bureaucratic, to the last man. That has not happened earlier. Will it happen under the new regime? Will the current leadership take meaningful initiatives in the matter?

It’s so even more, considering that the UNHRC’s unending probe has gone beyond war crimes and accountability issues. Through previous resolutions, it has become a ‘rolling probe’, where everyday occurrences that have an element of rights violation in it, have come to be added to the UNHRC’s ground-level investigation. Such add-ons go beyond the ethnic war and Tamil victims.

Where is it heading? When will it end? That’s the question.

(The writer is a Chennai-based Policy Analyst and Political Commentator. Email: sathiyam54@nsathiyamoorthy.com)

US Names Jayne Howell as Deputy Chief of Mission in Colombo

The U.S. Embassy in Colombo has welcomed Jayne Howell as its new Deputy Chief of Mission, marking a significant addition to the diplomatic team working to strengthen U.S.–Sri Lanka relations.

A career member of the Senior Foreign Service with the rank of Minister-Counselor, Howell brings a wealth of experience from her previous assignments in Pakistan, Türkiye, Ghana, Zimbabwe, and Afghanistan, as well as senior leadership roles in Washington D.C. within the Bureau of Consular Affairs.

Most recently, she served as Minister-Counselor for Consular Affairs in Pakistan and Türkiye, where she advised ambassadors on immigration and visa policy and coordinated services for thousands of American citizens annually.

Her leadership in Washington included serving as Deputy Executive Director, Supervisory Regional Consular Officer, and the inaugural Director of 1CA, a program focused on leadership and management excellence. For her contributions, she received the Luther I. Replogle Award for Management Improvement.

Originally from Charleston, South Carolina, Howell holds a B.A. in Archaeological Studies from the University of Texas at Austin.

She will be based in Colombo, where she will support the U.S. mission’s efforts to deepen bilateral cooperation.

Posted in Uncategorized

More skeletal remains, personal belongings unearthed at Chemmani mass grave

The ongoing excavation at the Chemmani mass grave site in Jaffna has led to the discovery of several more human skeletal remains along with personal belongings, marking a significant development in the investigation.

During the fourth day of the second phase of excavations on Sunday, forensic investigators uncovered clothing fragments, small glass bangles, and a blue cloth bag bearing English letters near one of the skeletal remains, which measured approximately three feet in length.

This marks the first instance in the current operation where personal effects have been found alongside human remains.

Preliminary reports suggest the blue cloth bag resembles school bags that were once distributed as humanitarian aid by non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to schoolchildren in the North and East during the conflict period. The discovery has raised concerns that some of the remains could belong to children.

As of June 29, a total of 33 human skeletal remains have been unearthed at the site, with 22 of them already exhumed and preserved for detailed forensic analysis.

Excavations at Chemmani are being conducted under the supervision of judicial and forensic officials, as part of a long-delayed investigation into alleged mass graves linked to the island’s decades-long civil conflict.

Posted in Uncategorized

India blames 1970s pact for arrest on fishermen by Sri Lanka

India’s External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar said Friday that Sri Lankan authorities are arresting Indian fishermen because of an Emergency-era agreement that gave up fishing rights in some areas.

“At the time, several big decisions would be taken without a debate. These days, there is a discussion about our fishermen going to Sri Lanka and getting arrested there. That is because of an agreement signed with Sri Lanka at the time of Emergency under which the rights of the fishermen to fish in some part of Sri Lankan waters were given up by us,” he said at a BJP youth wing event to mark the 50th anniversary of the Emergency.

Tamil Nadu’s DMK government has repeatedly raised the issue with the Union government. Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M K Stalin wrote to Prime Minister Narendra Modi earlier this year, calling for the return of Katchatheevu island that was handed over to Sri Lanka through agreements signed in 1974 and 1976.

The decades-old dispute resurfaced last year after Modi posted on X that the Congress “callously gave away” Katchatheevu to Sri Lanka in the 1970s.

Government data shows Sri Lanka has arrested more than 528 Indian fishermen in 2024.

Jaishankar said: “If it wasn’t for an Emergency Parliament, if Parliament at the time was a genuine Parliament, there would have been a debate and I don’t know if the Parliament would have allowed such an agreement,” he said. “The decisions taken at the time still show their impact in the state of Tamil Nadu.” The state is expected to go to the polls next year.

The External Affairs Minister also took aim at the Congress party, stating that one family’s interests were placed above the nation during the Emergency.

“There’s a movie titled Kissa Kursi Ka… these three words aptly tell the reason behind the imposition of the Emergency. When a family is considered above the nation, things like Emergency take place,” Jaishankar said.

He stated that during that time he was a 20 year-old student at Jawaharlal Nehru University, and the biggest lesson from the Emergency was to never take one’s freedom for granted.

In a reference to Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, Jaishankar said: “Some people flash the Constitution in but the feeling in their hearts is different… Political parties also have a DNA and they have, to date, never expressed regret for imposing Emergency.”

Responding to the remarks, Congress leader Jairam Ramesh said in a post on X: “What I can tell the EAM is to please tell us what President Trump is saying. What is his trade deal? Why is President Trump repeatedly claiming credit for the ceasefire? EAM would be well advised to deal with the complete collapse of Indian diplomacy… He should be worried about repairing the damage to Indian diplomacy rather than getting into the history of what happened 50 years ago.”

Later, speaking to reporters on the sidelines of the event, Jaishankar hailed the global outreach after Operation Sindoor. “I have a great sense of pride when I see Parliamentary delegations led by Shashi Tharoor, Supriya Sule, Kanimozhi, Sanjay Jha, Jay Panda, Ravi Shankar Prasad, and Shrikant Shinde…. when I see unity among all parties going out in the world, speaking in the national interest,” he said.

He also spoke about India’s refusal to sign the SCO joint statement, saying the objective of the grouping that runs through consensus was to fight terrorism. “In the discussion on the outcome document of the Defence Ministers’ meeting, one country said ‘no we don’t want reference to that’,” he said. Pakistan is learnt to have raised objections at the SCO defence ministers’ meeting.

(Indian Express)

Sri Lanka will not cede Katchatheevu Island to any faction: Fisheries Minister

The Katchatheevu Island belongs to Sri Lanka and will not be handed over to any other party under any circumstances, Minister of Fisheries, Aquatic and Ocean Resources Ramalingam Chandrasekar has asserted.

Fisheries Minister Chandrasekar noted that illegal fishing activities carried out by Indian fishermen in the Northern region are leading to the destruction of marine resources.

The Minister expressed these views in response to a statement made by Minister of External Affairs of India S. Jaishankar at a public event, where he claimed that the rights of Indian fishermen to fish in Sri Lankan waters—granted under an emergency agreement with Sri Lanka—had been violated.

Minister Ramalingam Chandrasekar stated that it is common during election periods in India, discussions about the Katchatheevu Island and Indian fishermen surface on political platforms.

Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Minister Ramalingam Chandrasekar stressed that the Indian fishermen who illegally enter Sri Lankan waters are severely destroying the marine resources in the north of the country.

He said more than 30% of the Northern population relies on the fishing industry and therefore they will take required measures to safeguard their livelihoods.

Posted in Uncategorized

Sri Lanka not informed over FAO vessel’s research decision: Foreign Minister

Sri Lanka government is yet to be officially informed over United Nation-flagged research vessel’s decision on not doing the planned research due to approval delay from the island nation’s government, Foreign Minister Vijitha Herath said.

Sources from the Foreign and Fisheries Ministries say the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) has informed that the research vessel “Dr Fridtj of Nansen” will not come to Sri Lanka research purposes because Sri Lanka delayed the approval as it has delayed to formulate standard operating procedures (SOP) to handle foreign research vessels.

Foreign Minister Vijitha Herath, however, said the government is “not officially informed”.

UN sources say Sri Lanka’s research opportunity is now given to Madagascar.

President Anura Kumara Dissanayake gave special approval for the research vessel after repeated requests from the UN.

The approval for the UN’s research vessel was not given due to the government’s delay in formulating standard operating procedures (SOP) to handle foreign research vessels.

Sources aware of the research vessel ghave told the EconomyNext that the “Dr Fridtj of Nansen” (F. Nansen), a state-of-the-art vessel was expected to conduct research involved with fish stock and the health of marine ecosystems in the Sri Lankan water.

Sri Lanka had originally rejected the UN request for the research vessel, which was scheduled to conduct the research from July 15-August 20 on the request of the previous Sri Lankan government.

As per original plan, it was scheduled to sail to Dhaka from Colombo and Bangladesh scientists are expected to get into the vessel while it is in Colombo after it finishes research in Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka government has agreed to allow the vessel to use its facilities to take Bangladesh scientists onboard.

The government did not allow the UN research vessel “pending the development of standard operating procedures for foreign research vessels”, a UN document said.

The cancellation of the visit would incur direct losses of over $1 million to Sri Lanka through the FAO and likely to reduce the efficacy of upcoming programming financed by the Green Climate Fund which would heavily rely on the data generated by the F. Nansen,” the document said.

If the current visit is cancelled, another would not be feasible until after 2030.

Cancelling the UN research vessel’s visit would deprive the country of critical data essential to the government’s decision making, damaging the prospects for economic development in a key sector of the economy, the UN has said.

The UN said the vessel is equipped to support Sri Lanka in the sustainable management of marine ecosystems and aquatic resources, in line with the request expressed by the Sri Lankan government.

Sri Lanka imposed a one-year moratorium over foreign research vessels amid pressure by India and the United States over Chinese vessels coming for research purposes.

Both the US and India have pressed Sri Lanka after two Chinese research vessels came to the island nation within 14 months.

The moratorium ended on Dec. 31, 2024, but President Anura Kumara Dissanayake government’s cabinet in January decided to appoint a new committee to review the existing SOP and come up with a new SOP to facilitate foreign research ships.

The government appointed the committee to look into the SOP only in the previous week and the first meeting was held on June 19.

The FAO has coordinated the deployment of the “Dr Fridtj of Nansen” vessel to Sri Lanka following a November 2023 request from the previous Sri Lankan government.

Sri Lanka is facing diplomatic challenges in allowing foreign research vessels within its waters due to geopolitical issues related to India and China.

Sri Lanka and China have agreed to sign a memorandum of understanding (MOU) on maritime cooperation amid Indian concerns over Chinese research ships visiting the Indian Ocean.

In April, Sri Lanka signed a Defence Cooperation MOU which said both neighbour countries will exchange information in maritime and other domains on mutual consent without elaborating.

Foreign Minister Herath in January said Sri Lanka does not have to take approval from India or inform the neighbour on visit of any foreign vessels. Government officials have said some previous governments have maintained such practices to maintain better relationships with India.

Jaffna ‘Presidential Palace’ Built on Illegally Acquired Land – Ministry Investigation Reveals

A recent investigation by the Ministry of Urban Development, Construction, and Housing has revealed that the Jaffna Presidential Palace was constructed on land illegally acquired from local residents, Lankadeepa reported.

The report states that eight individuals have come forward claiming legal ownership of the land on which the palace was built, creating complications for handing the property over to potential investors.

Commenting on the issue, Minister of Urban Development, Construction, and Housing, Anura Karunathilaka, said that all ownership disputes must be fully resolved before the property can be offered to any investor. He noted that steps are currently being taken to clear these legal obstacles.

Several parties, including an investor from Canada, have already expressed interest in acquiring the Jaffna President’s House for various investment purposes.

Constructed between 2010 and 2015, the President’s House is located on approximately 30 acres of land in Kankesanthurai. Buildings have been erected on about 15 of those acres. It is reported that about Rs 3.5 billion has been spent for these constructions.

Posted in Uncategorized