Chinese radio system for police

The Chinese Government is to provide a grant to Sri Lanka to improve the communication facilities for the Police.

As part of the Chinese grant, a widely used communication facility known as TETRA — Terrestrial Trunked Radio — will be provided to the Police to improve communication between senior officers and police stations. It also provides for tabs to support the body cameras which will be initially available for police stations in the Western Province where a base station will be set up.

The grant will be officially provided when the Chinese State Councillor and Defence Minister General Wei Fenghe visits Sri Lanka later this month.

The TETRA Communication system will also be initially available in the Western Province where the Inspector General will be able to address separate groups such as Deputy Inspectors General and officers in charge of police stations.

However, it was not clear how the Police would expand the use of the particular network to the rest of the country.

The Chinese capital widely uses this network and it is the biggest city-wide TETRA network in the world that serves 110,000 authority users in Beijing.

The Beijing Government Shared Radio Network, also called the “Beijing JustTop TETRA Network”, is the largest digital trunked network in Asia and the biggest city-wide TETRA network in the world.

Meanwhile, cybersecurity professionals have expressed concerns over the system. This is because of the lack of a dedicated institutional cybersecurity agency in the country to validate these types of devices for their security vulnerabilities before using them in critical sectors such as the Police.

The Sunday Times learns there are no such institutions in the country as of now to verify whether these types of devices carry any pre-patched data for transmission or consist of privacy issues that would make the process vulnerable.

These moves come as a Government-appointed Committee is looking into the modernisation and digitalisation of activities of the Police. Five Deputy Inspectors General, representatives of the Finance Ministry and the Legal Draftsman are members of the committee.

The committee is due to submit its recommendations in 45 days.

The plan will include establishing a traffic control system and an upgraded CCTV system among others.

Meanwhile, Foreign Minister Dinesh Gunawardena told the Sunday Times that the visiting Chinese Defence Minister would meet President Gotabaya Rajapaksa and Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa during a two-day visit.

This is the second-highest level visit to be undertaken by a Chinese official to Sri Lanka following senior Chinese diplomat, Yang Jiechi’s visit in October last year, after the change of government in 2019.

This week the Sri Lankan government entered into an agreement with the China Development Bank for a financing facility of USD 500 million.

Posted in Uncategorized

PCs amendment laws: Party leaders meet tomorrow to decide

A party leaders’ meeting will be held tomorrow (19) under the patronage of Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa, with a view to reaching a consensus on the draft of the Provincial Councils (PCs) Elections (Amendment) Bill.

Key governmental factions are yet to reach an understanding on the PC elections, especially concerning how the polls should be held.

Speaking with The Sunday Morning, Co-Cabinet Spokesman Udaya Gammanpila said: “The party leaders’ meeting will be held in order to reach a consensus on the draft PCs Elections (Amendment) Bill.”

In reply to a query with regard to what other issues would be raised at the said meeting, Gammanpila added: “If and when the party leaders come to a collective agreement concerning the issue at hand, they may also raise other topics.”

Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) General Secretary and State Minister Dayasiri Jayasekara, speaking to The Sunday Morning, added: “The party leaders’ meeting would be held tomorrow concerning the PC elections. We would be discussing as to how the elections would be held. While we do not plan on having it under the existing system (proportional representation), we are willing to opt for a new system (including the first-past-the-post system), as even the pradeshiya sabhas operate on a newer electoral system.”

Jayasekara also mentioned that he planned on raising certain queries with regard to the May Day rallies, as well as the current political situation within the country, at the party leaders meeting to be held tomorrow.

Efforts made by The Sunday Morning to contact Democratic Left Front Leader and Minister Vasudeva Nanayakkara and National Freedom Front Leader and Minister Wimal Weerawansa to gain more insights into the issue at hand proved futile.

Sri Lanka to impose restrictions on arrivals from overseas

Some restrictions will have to be imposed on arrivals from overseas taking into account the uptick in positive cases of COVID-19 among individuals arriving in Sri Lanka, says the Chief Epidemiologist Dr. Sudath Samaraweera.

In a statement, he said Sri Lanka has registered 52,710 coronavirus infections so far in 2021 with 1,593 of them coming in from foreign countries.

Reportedly, a large number of positive cases among those who arrived from the Middle East and some from Europe have been identified.

Sri Lanka’s cumulative infections confirmed in April added up to a total of 52,710 and 538 of them – some 15 percent – were from overseas, the chief epidemiologist stated.

As per Epidemiology Unit’s statistics, Sri Lanka has confirmed 78 coronavirus infections among the arrivals from overseas on Friday (April 16).

Dr. Samaraweera went on to note that some countries have already moved to halt foreign travels as third and fourth coronavirus waves continue to heap positive cases.

In order to maintain the progress Sri Lanka had made recently in controlling the spread of the virus, some restrictions will have to be imposed on the arrivals from overseas, Dr. Samaraweera pointed out.

Chinese manufacturer left queries unanswered

Several pertinent questions posed by the National Medicines Regulatory Authority (NMRA) experts’ panel, to the Beijing Institute of Biological Products, that manufactured the Sinopharm vaccine, were not answered, the final review report of the independent experts’ panel on the vaccine stated.

The independent experts’ panel comprising Dr. Rajiva de Silva, Prof. Neelika Malewige, Prof. Arunasalam Pathmeswaran, Dr. Ananda Wijewickrema, Dr. Kanthi Nanayakkara, Prof. Channa Ranasinhe,

Dr. Hasitha Tissera and Dr. Lak Kumar Fernando, in the report dated 17 March 2021, said the NMRA requested data on both 1 March and 15 March.

However, the data provided by the manufacturer was not sufficient to decide on immunogenicity, safety and efficacy of the vaccine and therefore, they recommend not using the vaccine until more information was made available and evaluated, the experts’ panel said.

However, the Health Ministry sacked seven of the NMRA Board members over ‘not approving’ the vaccine. They were Dr. Palitha Abeykoon (Chairman of NMRA), Chamindika Herath (Lawyer), Harshana Karunaratna (Accountant), Dr. Kapila Ranasinghe (PhD Management), Dr. Asita de Silva, Dr. Nethushi Samarasinghe, Dr. Lak Kumar Fernando and they were replaced by a team led by a medical practitioner and not one of medical eminence, as required based on the NMRA Act.

The termination letter issued to all seven members had no specific reason given but that the ‘Health Ministry has decided to reform the NMRA and appoint new members to the Board and that the team was terminated’.

Out of the 11 questions posed to Sinopharm by the experts’ panel, seven (7) were left unanswered by the Chinese company.

Questions such as efficacy data in the 60-year-old age group, the sample size inadequate to draw conclusions, whether anyone with comorbidities had been included in the trial, safety data of phase three of the vaccine, side effects observed, whether anyone developed allergies or anaphylaxis, ingredients in the vaccine, whether it has BSA or FBS since vero cells are known to be grown in FBS, the number of persons included in the analysis of immunogenicity, number of persons from all age groups were not given answered by the manufacturer.

Furthermore, the manufacturer has not provided follow up data after the interim analysis of phase 3 data presented until 31 October 2020.

The answer to the question “Neutralising antibody levels in those below 60 years of age in comparison to younger individuals,” the manufacturer had not responded other than ‘Seroconversion rates of 18-59 and below 60 provided but not the neutralising antibody levels,” the review report said.

Lack of answers from the Sinhopharm companies led the expert panel to halt the use of the vaccine.

One of the terminated members said, “I was removed because State Minister of Production, Supply and Regulation of Pharmaceuticals Channa Jayasumana thought I am an obstacle to get the Sinopharm approved in a hurry. It is his initiative. Health Minister Pavithra Wanniarachchi just had to send me the letter as she only has the power to do it. She was asked to do so by Secretary to the President P. B. Jayasundera on the request by of State Minister Jayasumana.

In the meantime the Chinese diplomatic circle has questioned the NMRA for delaying the Sinopharm jab that is only administered to the Chinese workers living in Sri Lanka currently.

They said Sinopharm made a special arrangement and provided most detailed documents about its BBIBP-CorV COVID-19 vaccine to the medicine regulator, including seven pages of Vaccine Introduction and 54 pages of International Summary Report of the Phase 3 Clinical Trial.

They also told Ceylon Today until Thursday (15), the population vaccinated in Chinese Mainland has passed 175.6 million.

They also claimed that on 31 March, the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) of the WHO said that Sinopharm and Sinovac have presented data on their COVID-19 vaccines indicating levels of efficacy and safety compatible with those required by the World Health Organization.

But the WHO in Colombo said that the dossiers are being reviewed for the Moderna, Gamaleya, Sinopharm, Sinovac, and others are in discussions with the WHO prequalification team for data submission to the WHO.

Posted in Uncategorized

Amid tension, PM to arrive in Colombo hastily

Ven. Muruttetuwe Ananda thera has reportedly informed Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa that president Gotabaya Rajapaksa had blamed the thera during a telephone conversation.

Sources say Ven, Ananda Thera has explained the incident to Premier Rajapaksa in a telephone call yesterday.

At the time, the premier was staying at his Carlton Residence in Tangalle.

When told about the incident, Premier Rajapaksa has requested the thera not to be panicked about it and that he would come to Colombo on Saturday and would come to the Abhayaramaya Temple to meet the thera.Ven. Muruttetuwe Ananda thera told a press briefing on Friday he the Buddhist monks do not hesitate to stand against if anyone tries to misuse the power against democracy.

The thera also said the Buddhist monks would raise their voice against anyone who attempts deliberately to amend the country’s laws.”Attempts are made to silence us., But, these monks who hails from the Kudapola, Wariyapola and Gunananda thero generations will not bow down to any threats,”

Posted in Uncategorized

Clergy kept in the dark over Port City Bill

Chief Registrar of the Asgiri Chapter Venerable Medagama Dhammananda Thera says the government has not briefed them thus far pertaining to the contents of the proposed Colombo Port City Economic Commission Bill.

Speaking to media in Kandy, Dhammananda Thera said they have information that through the proposed bill, country’s legal and administrative frameworks will be challenged.

Dhammananda Thera noted that they are hoping to hold discussions with the President and the government pertaining to the clauses included in the Port City Commission Bill presented in Parliament.

Dhammananda Thera said it is their responsibility to oppose all proposals that are detrimental to the country.

Won’t allow a Chinese state in Sri Lanka -Sobitha Thera

Former Chairman of the Jathika Hela Urumaya Venerable Omalpe Sobitha Thera says they vehemently oppose the move to establish a state of another country within Sri Lanka.

Omalpe Sobitha Thera noted that all factions should rally together to thwart the attempts made by the government to make Sri Lanka a Chinese colony.

The Thera noted that the country faced a 30-year-old conflict to liberate the country from separatists who waged war to capture a part of Sri Lanka.

Omalpe Sobitha Thera noted that now a similar attempt is being made through other means, without an armed struggle.

The Thera noted that the bill if passed, will result in Sri Lanka losing control of a 1,115-acre plot of land to China.

Omalpe Sobitha Thera questioned as to whether the public representatives are aware of the consequences of the Bill and whether they are willing to be a party to moves to hand over a region of the country to China.

Omalpe Sobitha Thera stressed that the President and the government have been appointed to govern the country only for a brief period, and they have no right to hand over certain parts of Sri Lanka to foreign powers.

Venerable Omalpe Sobitha Thera noted that they will strongly oppose any moves to grant powers to other countries to govern any part of Sri Lanka.

Posted in Uncategorized

China-funded US$ 1.4 billion Colombo Port City project faces legal challenge

A five-judge bench of the Sri Lankan Supreme Court will go into a number of petitions filed against the US$ 1.4 billion China-funded Colombo Port City Commission Bill presently in parliament.

The petitioners contend that the proposed legislation is in contravention of the Sri Lankan Constitution. They have sought a two-thirds majority and a referendum to get the controversial bill passed.

Among the petitioners are: the United National Party (UNP) General Secretary Palitha Range Bandara, Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) MP Wasantha Samarasinghe, the Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL), Transparency International Sri Lanka (TISL), the Centre for Policy Alternatives (CPA) and Engineer G. Kapila Renuka Perera.

The petitions filed by Perera and CPA will be taken up on Monday next before a panel of five judges headed by Chief Justice Jayantha Jayasuriya comprising of Justices P.B. Aluwihare, Priyantha Jayawardena, Murdu N.B. Fernando and Janak de Silva.

The petitions said that several clauses of the Constitution would be breached by the passage of the Port City Commission Bill. Several petitions called for the Bill to be changed only through a two-thirds parliamentary majority and a referendum.

Transparency International Sri Lanka raised corruption concerns, including the possibility that the Bill could pave the way for facilitating or enabling illicit financial flows and money laundering. The TISL also drew attention to the lack of transparency in the ownership of the “offshore” businesses that will be set up at the Port City, since the ultimate owners of the businesses need not be disclosed. TISL said it is concerned also about the lack of transparency in offshore banking operations that could be free from the purview of the regulatory framework governing local Sri Lankan banks.

Several petitions also alleged that the Bill evaded parliamentary oversight on public funds, which they argued, infringes the rights of the Sri Lankan public.

The Bar Association of Sri Lanka questioned why the government decided to enter the Bill into the order book ahead of the New Year holidays, which severely limited the amount of time for the public to exercise their right to examine the bill and offer their comments.

“The Executive Committee of the BASL notes that the provisions in the Bill that directly affect the judiciary and the legal profession which are found in Part XIII (International Commercial Dispute Resolution Center) and Part XIV (Priority Hearing in Legal Proceedings) of the Bill. These could lead to an ouster of the jurisdiction of Courts, infringe on judicial discretion and violate the principle of the equality of parties before the law and therefore may violate Articles 3, 4, 12 and 14 of the Constitution. The aforesaid Articles of the Constitution pertain inter alia to the Sri Lankan State, the Unitary Status of the Republic, the Sovereignty of the People, the fundamental rights of the people and the powers of Parliament,” the BASL statement said.

The BASL committee appointed to study the Bill recommended that the Association should file a petition before the Supreme Court, challenge the constitutionality of the Bill under Article 120 of the Constitution, call for observations from its Members, including Members who have the required expertise, and request the Government to defer any further action on this Bill for a reasonable time to enable the BASL to engage with and consult the relevant stakeholders and contribute fully in this important national endeavor.

“The Interim Report and the recommendations of the Committee were unanimously approved and adopted by the Executive Committee at a Special Meeting on 12 April. Therefore, in furtherance of the Objects of the Association set out in Article 2.1 of the Constitution of the BASL, the Executive Committee directed the President and Secretary to challenge the Bill under Article 120 of the Constitution before the Supreme Court and also to write to the President and the Prime Minister bringing to their attention the concerns of the BASL,” the statement added.

The Executive Committee of the BASL appealed to the government to defer further action on the Bill, until the views of all stakeholders, including the public, are sought and given due consideration. Shortly after the statement was released, Bar Association President Saliya Peiris also filed a petition before the Supreme Court.

The Government has, however, maintained that the Bill will not undermine the Constitution or infringe on the sovereignty of the people.

Background

The Colombo Port City project, which China considers as being part of President Xi Jinping’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), has had many hiccups. The previous Sri Lankan government headed by President Maithripala Sirisena and Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe had alleged high corruption indulged in by the Mahinda Rajapaksa regime and stalled the project for a year and a half in 2015-16. Ultimately, no corrupt act could be proved and the government settled the matter with the Chinese State owned company concerned through some give and take.

The land for the project, reclaimed from the sea, is now ready to be parceled and sold to investors. The Port City will not have industries but only financial and commercial institutions and the laws applicable to it will be international, very different from Sri Lanka’s laws.

But the former as well as the present Gotabaya Rajapaksa regimes took an inordinately long time to finalize the special laws for the Port City. President Xi Jinping had to talk to President Gotabaya Rajapaksa to get the project moving.

Given the abject dependence of the Lankan government on China for financial help to meet its expenditures on COVID control and meet international debt obligations, the bill to manage the Port City was hurriedly finalized and placed in parliament. When the contents of the bill were published in the newspapers, concerns arose among a cross section of Sri Lankans.

The matter now rests with the Supreme Court. If the court has no objections to the bill, government will be able to pass it easily as it has two thirds majority in parliament. But if the court says that the bill has to be amended (drastically to fit into the present constitution) the government will have great difficulty. On the one hand it will have to manage China, its sole financial benefactor, and on the other it will have to get the bill passed in a referendum which is not going to be easy given the strength of nationalistic sentiments among Sri Lankans.

Source:Newsin

JVP wants referendum to approve Port City Bill

The JVP says a public referendum must be held in order to approve the proposed Colombo Port City Economic Commission Bill.

Speaking during a media briefing in Colombo today, Leader of the JVP Anura Kumara Dissanayake said several clauses that challenge the country’s sovereignty have been included in the proposed bill.

Parliamentarian Anura Kumara Dissanayake pointed out that the Board of Investment is an independent body that could oversee such investment projects.

Therefore, the JVP leader questioned why the government could not go through the BOI and needed to appoint a separate commission for Port City Activities and tax concessions.

He questioned why it would not be included as a part of the Local Authorities framework, and why salaries would be paid in foreign currency, why duties would be taxes would be levied when moving purchases out of the region and why would investors be given tax exemptions.

Therefore, the JVP leader accused the Chinese of trying to invade trade in Sri Lanka through long-term plans.

He stressed that the Port City Commission Bill must not be passed in parliament without seeking public opinion through a referendum.

MP Dissanayake explained that to be a patriot simply does not mean one will kiss the land he was born in.

Parliamentarian Anura Kumara Dissanayake pointed out that Sri Lanka has become a beggar’s nation which has to plead for loans from foreign nations as the country has been blacklisted on the international markets.

Therefore, MP Dissanayake claimed China is brokering a deal to disburse loans, only if Sri Lanka gives the Port City to them, and also provides three islands in the North to build power plants.

He also claimed India followed the same strategy to invade local resources within the port. The JVP leader said Sri Lanka had no option but to agree to terms and plead for loans from China.

Posted in Uncategorized

Wijedasa claims life under threat by President

Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) Parliamentarian Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe claims he was verbally abused and threatened by President Gotabaya Rajapaksa today.

He said that the President had abused him during a telephone conversation.

The Government MP said that Rajapaksa was elected to office on the promise that State resources will not be sold.

However, he said that concerns had been raised over the proposed Port City Economic Commission Bill.

The MP said that he had raised concerns over the Bill and the serious implications that may arise from it.

He said the President had then contacted him today and spoken in an abusive and threatening manner.

Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe said that he expected the President to speak in a diplomatic manner as a President should.

“However, he spoke in a manner not suitable to a State leader,” he said.

Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe said that he had no option but to respond in the same tone.

“We have concerns over our safety now,” he said.

He also said that he had complained to the Police over the threat.

Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe said that the President had threatened others in the same manner as well.