Sri Lanka rejects inclusion of Cuba on list of terrorist states

The Joint Committee of Democratic Unions of Sri Lanka confirmed its support for Cuba’s declaration demanding its fair elimination from the list of states sponsors of terrorism created by the United States.

The organization confirmed in a statement that adding Cuba to the arbitrary list has political purposes and causes serious economic problems for the Cuban people, despite which Cuba resists and is an example for the people who fight against imperialism.

The Committee agreed with the Cuban Foreign Ministry that it is not enough for the United States to recognize Cuba’s full collaboration in the fight against terrorism; they must go further and remove Cuba from the unjust list.

In recent days, various Sri Lankan organizations joined the global demand against the aggressive policy of the United States against Cuba and demanded the removal of Cuba from the unjust list once and for all.

The Left Democratic Front of Sri Lanka and the Sri Lanka-Cuba Parliamentary Friendship Association also urged the current US government to eliminate the inhumane measures it maintains against Cuba, of proven international rejection.

(Cuba SI)

Posted in Uncategorized

Sri Lankan politics: 15 years since the end of the war By Veeragathy Thanabalasingham

Fifteen years have passed since the end of Sri Lanka’s brutal civil war, which lasted for about 30 years. None of the main political problems have been resolved. The country is not progressing economically either. Instead, we saw that all the problems worsened and the country reached a state of chaos and bankruptcy.

A large part of the southern Sinhalese polity does not seem to think that there is a pressing need to find a negotiated political solution to the national ethnic problem that has torn the country apart. In these 15 years, the country has not moved an inch towards finding a political compromise that would fulfil the legitimate political aspirations of the minority communities.

Even the implementation of the 13th Amendment (13A), which has been a part of the Constitution for more than three decades, has finally become impossible. In no other country in the world do we see political forces taking to the streets to protest against the implementation of a constitutional provision.

Former President Mahinda Rajapaksa, who never failed to claim credit for providing what he called courageous political leadership to defeat the Tamil Tigers militarily in war, had the rare historical opportunity to find a political solution to the ethnic problem with the support of the Sinhalese people 15 years ago.

However, he deliberately ignored that opportunity and pursued more aggressive ethnic majoritarian politics with the dream of ruling Sri Lanka for a long period. He liberally used the war victory to divert the attention of the Sinhalese people from the main issues affecting them. That regressive strategy helped him and his family to stay in power for a few more years but did nothing good for the Sinhalese people.

It did not take long for the truth to be exposed that the ethnic majoritarian mobilisation was essentially a cover-up for misrule and corruption. However, the south still does not seem to have learnt a proper lesson from it.

It is very unfortunate that even after Sri Lanka’s unprecedented popular uprising ousted the Rajapaksas from power two years ago, they are still able to run the Government from behind the scenes and are able to claim that the candidate who gets their support and blessings will be the next president.

Only a national election can tell if the popular uprising and the subsequent political developments have brought about any positive change in the political thinking of the people of the south of Sri Lanka.

Doubtful political commitment

Meanwhile, the prospective main candidates will focus on the economic crisis at the Presidential Election, which is still four months away. It is unlikely that they will be concerned about the need to find a political solution to the national problem.

Addressing the Samagi Jana Balawegaya (SJB) May Day rally in Colombo, Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa said his future government would find solutions to the problems of the minority communities with the support of the Sinhalese people and implement the 13th Amendment to the Constitution. However, it remains to be seen whether he will mention it in his election manifesto.

As for President Ranil Wickremesinghe, although he has the image of being the only Sinhalese leader minority communities in general and Tamils in particular can approach to find a solution to their problems, he is unlikely to show the courage to adopt any approach that could alienate the Sinhalese nationalist electorate.

National People’s Power (NPP) Leader Anura Kumara Dissanayake had recently said in a speech in Jaffna that he would not negotiate to get votes from the Tamils by promising 13A plus or a federal solution. He promised to create a Sri Lankan identity that embraces all communities.

In one of his recent articles, political analyst Rajan Philips said that there was already some identity on everyone’s National Identity Card and passport. He added that Dissanayake was neither here nor there and asked whether he was suggesting anything more.

It is almost certain that none of the main candidates will make any promises that the Sinhalese people do not want in order to win the votes of minority communities. At the same time, it cannot be expected that any candidate will emphasise on the need to find a political solution forcefully in their campaign among the Sinhalese people.

In this background, not only the political problems of the Tamil people but also their humanitarian problems have intensified over the last 15 years. The Tamil people are unable to protect their lands from invasions carried out with the support of security forces and hardline Sinhalese nationalist political forces. They even have to fight to remember the war dead.

Blocking such commemorative events using security forces and Police is a cruel form of racism. This time a strange approach can be seen in the actions of the Police. The Police did not interfere with the commemorations in the north but only prevented them in the east. One could not understand the logic behind it.

Fragmented Tamil polity

At the same time, a major problem facing the Tamil people is the absence of a cohesive polity to properly guide them in the post-war period. Tamil people have Members of Parliament (MPs), but there are no prudent political leaders to draw lessons from past tragedies and guide them in a manner suitable to contemporary domestic and international political situations.

After the end of the war, the historic responsibility of leading the Tamil people of the Northern and Eastern Provinces automatically fell to the Tamil National Alliance (TNA). The leaders of the TNA failed to handle it properly and re-establish a strong polity among the Tamil people. They merely acted in the interest of party politics and did not care to build the TNA into a united political force capable of taking the Tamil people’s struggle for political rights to the next stage post-war. They do not possess the political wisdom or commitment to do so.

As a result, today the Tamil polity is fragmented. All parties are divided in one way or another. Where is the time for the Tamil politicians to care about resolving the problems of the Tamil people when they are incapable of resolving their own disputes?

While the Sinhalese polity, despite the various contradictions within it, mostly has a unified stand on what not to give to the Tamils, the Tamil parties are unable to reach a consensus to demand what the Tamil people need from the Government.

While the southern Lankan parties are not interested in finding a political solution to the national problem, we see a worrisome situation where there is no unity among the Tamil political forces. Although Tamil parties have been holding consultations on the idea of fielding a Tamil common candidate at the Presidential Election, it is difficult to expect them to come to an agreement. It is doubtful whether any dignified non-political personality would come forward as a common candidate when looking at the ridiculous comments made by the leaders of some Tamil parties.

Be that as it may, we now see an intensification of impractical political activities that bind the Tamil people to the memories of past struggles. The Tamil people have every right to remember and honour those who sacrificed their lives in the struggles to win the political rights of their people and the innocent people who were unjustly killed in the war. However, it is very important to understand that there is no point in simply living with memories without introspection as to why those struggles, full of unimaginable sacrifices, ultimately came to a tragic end.

A twofold trend

This being the case, two new unhealthy trends are seriously infiltrating Tamil nationalist politics. One of them is religious extremism. Tamil nationalist politics has been secular since its inception. It embraced all sects among the Tamil-speaking community.

The late S.J.V. Chelvanayakam, affectionately called ‘Thanthai Chelva’ and respected as the leader of the Tamils for decades, was not a Hindu. But there was a time when all sections of the Tamil-speaking community, including the Muslims, irrespective of their religious identities, accepted his leadership. It was also the most significant salutary feature of Tamil nationalist politics.

In recent times, attempts are being made to identify Tamil politics with Hinduism.

Some people are also demanding that only a Hindu should be fielded as a common candidate on behalf of the Tamils at the Presidential Election. Not only that, the idea of putting one of the Hindu gurus who are actively involved in political activities as the common candidate was also proposed. There is no doubt that these efforts are influenced by the Hindutva policy of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in India.

Another trend is the increased influence of extremist elements within the diaspora Tamil community in Sri Lankan Tamil politics. There was a long period when the diaspora community made a tremendous contribution to the political rights and struggle of the Tamils. The diaspora Tamil community made an enormous contribution in bringing the Government’s oppression of the Tamil people to the attention of the international community.

However, in the period after the end of the war, certain elements among the diaspora Tamils have tended to exercise undue influence in Tamil politics. Due to this, corrupt activities have increased in Tamil politics like never before. They believe that the direction of Sri Lankan Tamil politics can be decided by the money sent from abroad.

Those living in a safe environment abroad and talking about impractical policies can never decide what kind of political solution the Tamils living in the country need. Unhealthy interventions by political groups in the diaspora community also encourage antisocial activities in Tamil areas.

Today’s Sri Lankan Tamil community does not have any of the characteristics of a community that has gone through a three-decade liberation struggle full of unimaginable sacrifices.

Therefore, if this situation continues, there is a danger that Sri Lankan Tamils will become a group of people that the world does not pay attention to and Tamil politicians will become a group of people who make impractical political slogans and only crow within the confines of the peninsula.

(The writer is a senior journalist based in Colombo)

Snap general election to follow presidential election immediately

A snap general election will follow immediately after the presidential elections to be concluded in October, this year, the Daily Mirror learns.

President Ranil Wickremesinghe is reported to have ruled out his intention to declare a snap general election ahead of or during the presidential poll. He has told the Cabinet ministers that a parliamentary election will follow the presidential elections.

It is politically sensible that a snap election will be declared whoever wins the presidential elections in October instead of waiting till the scheduled time for such an election in the
middle of next year.

Any candidate who wins will choose to have a new Parliament with a majority for his party or alliance. It is natural in Sri Lankan political culture for the party that wins presidential
elections to win the general elections that follows.

Last time, the general election was conducted in August, 2020. The Election Commission is bound legally to conduct any election declared in terms of the Constitution. Also, there are
provisions for the conduct of the general and presidential elections simultaneously.

After July 17, the Commission will get the authority to initiate work for the presidential elections with the target of polling being taken on a day between September 17 and October
16.

In a notice signed by its chairman R.M.A.L. Ratnayake, the Election Commission said it will call for nominations to hold the presidential election within the specified timeframe in terms of the provisions of the Constitution.

The Commission is currently making logistical arrangements for the conduct of elections.

State Minister Wakkumbura Announces Multiple Requests to Invalidate Local Government Nominations

State Minister of Provincial Councils and Local Government, Janaka Wakkumbura, has reported that numerous parties have submitted requests to invalidate nominations for the upcoming local government elections.

Minister Wakkumbura highlighted that the elections cannot proceed as scheduled due to four ongoing court cases related to the electoral process. In light of these legal challenges, a decision has been made to consider postponing the local government elections until the conclusion of these court cases.

Proposed NY legislation to delay restructuring

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) warns that proposed New York (NY) legislation on adding legality to debt restructuring would risk complicating and prolonging debt restructurings in countries such as Sri Lanka.

Accordingly, speaking to Bloomberg, an IMF spokesperson said that the bill which the lawmakers in New York are pushing to change the way sovereign debt overhauls are carried out after a country defaults, would introduce “significant uncertainty” into the existing debt restructuring architecture, although the legislation would add more order to the process.

“They may lead to negative impacts on the timeliness and predictability of the sovereign debt restructuring process,” the Fund representative told Bloomberg.

According to the IMF spokesperson, one proposal would create a bankruptcy-like adjustment process under NY law. “These impacts need to be carefully considered in consultation with all stakeholders,” the spokesperson added.

The IMF has not made any formal recommendations on the matter, the spokesperson said the Fund’s Board has backed a contractual approach to debt restructurings which includes covenants known as collective action clauses.

The warning adds a powerful institutional voice to an increasingly contentious issue that has pitted Wall Street against a cadre of politicians, activists, labour unions and charities backing the legislation. Impact on markets has so far been limited–the bills have yet to be scheduled for a vote and the New York legislative session ends 6 June.

At stake is a key part of the business of emerging-market debt investing. Roughly, United States dollars ($) 800 billion of outstanding hard-currency bonds sold by developing nations are governed by New York law, making the State the foremost jurisdiction for sovereign debt issuance.

Under current practice, investors holding those bonds negotiate a settlement with governments after they default.

Lately, however, developing nations have struggled to reach agreements with various creditors, including bondholders, bilateral lenders, and international banks. Recent restructurings in Suriname, Sri Lanka, and Zambia stretched for years.

The bills seek to introduce legal oversight to the process. One of them, the Sovereign Debt Stability Act, would limit the amount bondholders can recoup in the process. Wall Street has rejected the proposals, claiming they would lead to higher upfront borrowing costs for poor nations.

The Chief Economist of the World Bank Group Indermit Gill and a veteran restructuring attorney Lee Buchhei wrote in a blog post last week that while some of the proposals could help ensure losses are equally shared between private bondholders and public creditors–like foreign governments–the language of the bills need to be tweaked.

The proposed legislation “isn’t exactly surgical in its scope,” they wrote, saying the bills should be worded in a way that limits which countries are eligible, and details what “burden-sharing standards” will mean in practice.

“We believe these flaws may yet be salvaged. There is significant value in limiting how much a creditor can collect in a legal proceeding against a low-income country participating in a consensual debt-workout process,” they wrote.

Posted in Uncategorized

Govts, oppositions, religions, media have failed Sri Lanka’s war victims: Amnesty chief

Successive governments, opposition leaders, the religious establishment and the media have failed the victims of Sri Lanka’s there-decade-long war and the people at large, Amnesty International’s Secretary General Agnès Callamard said.

“This is a significant year for Sri Lanka, marking 15 years since the end of the three-decade long internal armed conflict that left tens of thousands of people injured, dead, displaced, or forcibly disappeared. But it is not just successive governments that have failed the victims and the people of Sri Lanka. All those in positions of leadership, from elected officials to opposition leaders, the religious establishment and the national media, have failed to hold the line on the fight against impunity,” a statement quoted Callamard as saying at the conclusion of a five-day visit to Sri Lanka.

Legislation such as the Online Safety Act and a proposed nongovernmental organisation (NGO) law are worrying evidence of the dangers currently confronting Sri Lankas’s vibrant civil society, she said.

“We are further concerned about the crackdown on freedom of expression and peaceful assembly, including through the use of ICCPR Act provisions, to make arbitrary arrests, These are often carried out under multiple accusations without formal charge or evidence and has led to lives being lived in limbo. This must end,”

Callamard said her visit provided insights into various challenges Sri Lanka is confronting 15 years after the end of the war that has “fractured and polarised Sri Lankan society”.

“I am deeply grateful to all those who engaged with us, recounting their pain and grief, sharing their views and concerns, and voicing their hopes, fears and demands for the present and the future. Amnesty International stands ready to support all genuine efforts and commitments to confront long-standing impunity, address the violations and grievances of the past and present, and put an end to discrimination and the repression of fundamental freedoms,” she said.

Callamard thanked President Ranil Wickremesinghe for the opportunity to engage in a “constructive dialogue over the human rights challenges facing Sri Lanka”.

“As the home of our South Asia Regional Office, Sri Lanka is vital to our work and we appreciate the government’s continued support and commitment to our cause,” she said.

Following the meeting with President Wickremesinghe on Thursday May 16, an Amnesty International delegation travelled to Mullaithivu on Friday to meet families whose loved ones were forcibly disappeared during the war. Callamard took part in the commemoration on May 18 at Mullivaikkal marking the 15th anniversary of the end of war and the “suffering endured by the Tamils in the lead up to 18 May, before returning to Colombo to meet representatives of the Malaiyaha Tamil community, human rights defenders, protestors, members of civil society organizations, members of the international community and government representatives.”

She also commented on the upcoming elections.

“The elections slated in the coming months will also have a major impact on the future of Sri Lanka and human rights considerations for years to come. The political leadership of the country must implement trust building measures that will address divisions, encourage inter-ethnic solidarity, and provide avenues for meaningful healing. It is imperative to address past wrongs; and make a conscious effort to create an enabling environment for redress while the government considers the establishment of a new Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

“A seemingly lack of political will, along with complacency in delivering justice, prevents reconciliation, feeds grievances, and promotes instability. There should be no room for complacency. We urge the international community to work with the national authorities to secure truth and justice for all victims of the war and of on-going human rights violations and lay the foundations for a freer and fairer Sri Lanka,” she said.

Posted in Uncategorized

Sri Lanka CHEC Port City project completion date extended

Sri Lanka will extend the CHEC Port City Colombo (Pvt) Ltd project completion date by two (2) years, cabinet spokesman Bandula Gunawardena said.

The then Ministry of Megapolis and Western Development, Urban Development Authority and CHEC Port City Colombo (Pvt) Ltd signed a tripartite agreement in 2016 with a target completion date of June 5, 2025.

However, due to the pandemic, and the project company’s financial constraints and inability to generate sufficient revenue to meet obligations to creditors, the project will not be completed on time, the minister said.

“Therefore the period of implementation of the Colombo Port City Development Project will be extended to June 5, 2027 with the signing of a supplementary agreement between the Ministry of Investment Promotion, Colombo Port City Economic Commission and CHEC Port City Colombo (Pvt) Ltd company,” Gunawardena told reporters on Thursday.

Earlier this month Sri Lanka’s Export Development Board signed an agreement with CHEC Port City Colombo to attract and facilitate export-oriented businesses.

Posted in Uncategorized

Norwegian Ambassador meets President, political leaders

May-Elin Stener, the Ambassador of Norway to Sri Lanka and India visited Sri Lanka from 2 to 9 May. The visit marks a pivotal moment in the strengthening of bilateral ties between Norway and Sri Lanka as Ambassador Stener engaged in constructive dialogues with key stakeholders, including Ranil Wickremesinghe, President of Sri Lanka, Foreign Minister Ali Sabry, Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa, the Leader of National People’s Power, Anura Kumara Dissanayaka and ITAK MP, M.A. Sumanthiran.

During her meeting with President Wickremesinghe, Ambassador Stener was briefed on the commendable progress of Norwegian investments and development projects in Sri Lanka. Both parties reiterated their commitment to sustaining the close partnership between the two nations, underscoring mutual interests in various sectors.

A pivotal segment of Ambassador Stener’s diplomatic mission unfolded in discussions with Foreign Minister Ali Sabry, where the positive trends of investments and increasing tourist inflows from Norway to Sri Lanka were discussed. Other crucial topics such as reconciliation efforts, economic reforms and ongoing Norwegian development initiatives within Sri Lanka were also addressed.

Ambassador Stener also had insightful dialogues with key Opposition figures, including Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa. The topics of discussion revolved around Sri Lanka’s economic priorities, with particular emphasis on fostering collaboration in renewable energy, maritime affairs and circular economy initiatives.

Acknowledging the diverse political landscape, Ambassador Stener extended her appreciation to Anura Kumara Dissanayaka for a substantive exchange of views on Sri Lanka’s developmental trajectory. Both parties explored avenues for bolstering Norway’s contributions to Sri Lanka’s development and reconciliation endeavours, identifying promising sectors for enhanced cooperation.

Ambassador Stener’s visit exemplifies Norway’s steadfast commitment to nurturing bilateral relations with Sri Lanka. She is supported by the Honorary Consul General for Norway in Sri Lanka Mano Sekaram and the Consulate Office.

‘No to domestic mechanism,’ Tamil relatives of disappeared tell Amnesty chief

War affected Tamils have told the head of a leading international human rights watchdog that justice for their loved ones who have been victims of enforced disappearances after surrendering to Sri Lankan military in the final stages of the war can only be realised through an international inquiry.

Tamil mothers have conveyed these concerns to Dr Agnès Callamard, during her first ever visit to war torn Mullaitivu as Amnesty International’s Secretary General. The discussion had been held a day before the Tamil Genocide Remembrance Day commemoration in Mullivaikkal, which marks the 15th anniversary of denial of justice to Tamil people since the end of the war on 18 May 2009.

Speaking to local journalists following the discussion held on the evening of 17 May, Mullaitivu District Association of Relatives of Enforced Disappearances’ (ARED) Chairperson, Mariyasuresh Easwari, said that she informed the AI head of threats posed by state intelligence agencies throughout their ongoing struggle during the past seven years to discover the truth about their loved ones.

“Sri Lanka would not deliver justice regarding the fate of our relatives. Justice should be served to us through referring the matter to an international mechanism. We explained how we oppose the establishment of local commissions of inquiry again and again in Sri Lanka, how we handed over our relatives to them, how they conduct surveillance about us, how intelligence services intimidate us, and how our protests are suppressed.”

The talks were attended by chairpersons and secretaries of the ARED representing all eight districts of the northern and eastern provinces. Following the discussions, Ampara District ARED head Thambirasa Selvarani said that she told Callamard that in their quest to get justice for their loved ones, hybrid courts with Sri Lankan participation cannot be accepted.

A UN Human Rights Council resolution has recommended a hybrid court with commonwealth judges to investigate allegations of war crimes and human rights violations in the final stage of the war.

“We have no faith in hybrid courts. We do not accept hybrid courts. We urged that an international court is necessary. She said that foreign judges would be appointed to that. We said that even then, lawyers would be locals, and we cannot tell them our problems. We further said that what is more acceptable for us is an international mechanism, and that we are ready to give evidence in such a mechanism.”

Tamil mothers said they informed the Amnesty International chief of Tamil people’s land forcibly occupied by the army for years and is yet to be released. Moreover, they have explained to her about intimidation over the public offering of ‘Mullivaikkal Kanji’ (rice gruel). This Kanji was the only sustenance to those confined to a narrow strip of coastal land during the final stages of the war, and survived amidst shell, air and artillery attacks and denial of access to medicines and food.

According to Tamil mothers, Callamard had told her delegation that she was able to get a far better understanding of the issues faced by the war-affected Tamil people by visiting the Vanni region than the information she could obtain from abroad.

Attending the Tamil Genocide Remembrance Day in Mullivaikkal a day after the meeting, Callamard described the anniversary as a grim reminder of the collective failure of the international community to deliver justice, as well.

“Today’s anniversary is a grim reminder of the collective failure of the Sri Lankan authorities and the international community to deliver justice to the many victims of Sri Lanka’s three-decade-long internal armed conflict. It is sobering to stand in the same place where, 15 years ago, countless civilian lives were lost during the last days of the war.”

She has further warned about the risk of weakening international focus on delivering justice over crimes that occurred 15 years ago in Sri Lanka due to the global attention on the ongoing conflicts elsewhere.

“Victims still await justice at Mullivaikkal, Sri Lanka. We cannot allow for the mothers’ tears and cries to be swept away from international attention. What happened to the 60000, if not 100000 disappeared persons? Their families have a right to know,” Callamard said on X, earlier known as twitter.

She had emphasised that although UN investigations have found credible evidence of crimes under international law and other violations of international human rights and humanitarian law committed by those on both sides of the conflict, there has been little in the way of an independent or impartial national inquiry into such serious crimes.

“The families of those who were forcibly disappeared during the conflict have been left to search desperately for their loved ones. It is truly heartbreaking to hear from victims how long they have been demanding justice in vain.”

Two days after the Mullivaikkal remembrance and a day after the government’s war victory celebration, Callamard had met Sri Lanka’s Foreign Minister in Colombo.

The Minister said that during the discussion, he recalled that more than 26,000 members of the Sri Lankan armed forces laid their lives and thousands more sacrificed their limbs ‘to reclaim the nation’s freedom and peace’.

“I further expressed our displeasure on outside influence being brought into the internal affairs of Sri Lanka by those engaged in vote bank politics to appease a small domestic audience,” Minister Ali Sabry, PC, said on social media.

Once in Colombo, the AI chief expressed doubts about the government’s willingness to deliver justice.
“A seemingly lack of political will, along with complacency in delivering justice, prevents reconciliation, feeds grievances, and promotes instability. There should be no room for complacency.”

Nevertheless, she called upon the international community ‘to work with the national authorities’ despite the victims emphasising the futility of such an engagement.

“We urge the international community to work with the national authorities to secure truth and justice for all victims of the war and of on-going human rights violations and lay the foundations for a freer and fairer Sri Lanka,” said Amnesty International’s Secretary General, Agnès Callamard at the conclusion of her five day visit to Sri Lanka.