Sri Lanka’s Rajapaksa gives mixed signals on support for Wickremesinghe

Former President Mahinda Rajapaksa continues to give mixed signals on his party’s continued support for Sri Lanka President Ranil Wickremesinghe; on the one hand commending the latter’s outburst at a foreign journalist and, on the other, criticising price increases and hardships on the public.

Fielding questions from reporters on Wednesday October 04, Rajapaksa said Wickremesinghe’s controversial interview with a Deutsche Welle (DW) journalist was “good”.

One of the journalists who had surrounded Rajapaksa on his way to his official vehicle prompted Rajapaksa with a call back to his own confrontations with foreign media during his tenure as president. The journalist said: “You were also once someone who spoke firmly to foreign media. Now Mr Wickremesinghe has reached that same level. What do you make of that?”

“That’s good. It’s how it should be done,” replied Rajapaksa.

Asked about Wickremesinghe’s insistence in the DW interview that no international investigation will be held on the 2019 Easter Sunday bombings, the former president and leader of the ruling Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna said: “That’s very correct. It is what the people are expecting too.”

Commenting on allegations made by the UK’s Channel 4 relating to the Easter attacks, he said: “We can’t dance to the tune of Channel 4.”

Rajapaksa also dismissed concerns about the controversial “online safety bill” that was tabled in parliament on Wednesday.

“No one will raise their hand for that,” he said, despite the bill being tabled by an SLPP MP: Minister of Public Security Tiran Alles.

Amid reports of increased splintering within the SLPP, speculation has been rife of different factions of the once formidable party struggling to make up its mind on continued support for President Wickremesinghe.

Against this backdrop, Rajapaksa, who leads the SLPP, offered some thinly veiled criticism of the Wickremesinghe administration, despite the government comprising almost entirely SLPP MPs.

“That’s what we’re telling the government. The people are struggling. The people must be helped. That’s what we’re saying too,” he said.

One journalist offered, ostensibly to egg the former president on, that the people didn’t suffer as much during his administration from 2005 to 2015.

“That is true. If you’re saying that, it must be absolutely correct,” replied Rajapaksa.

“Are you on the side of the people?”

“Yes, definitely.”

Asked if he could not offer some advice to the incumbent president, Rajapaksa said: “The thing is, if our advice is sought, we can give it. You can’t force advice.”

The SLPP leader added that the parliamentary group of the party is discussing reported plans to impose another power tariff hike.

Asked if Rajapaksa did not wish to take back control, he said: “I think I served long enough. We need to go ahead with a new leadership now.”

Posted in Uncategorized

China keeps Sri Lanka in debt grip, stalling IMF relief

(NIKKEI ASIA) Sri Lanka’s diplomatic failure to secure a concrete debt relief framework from China, its largest bilateral lender, is blocking access to desperately needed cash under a $3 billion bailout from the International Monetary Fund.

A visit by IMF officials last month highlighted once again the bankrupt South Asian nation’s slow progress in restructuring its external debt. The fund, which has insisted on “financing assurances” from bilateral lenders as a key pillar, gave Sri Lanka a failing grade in the first review of the bailout, denying it a second tranche of $330 million in aid.

Now the stakes are rising for an expected mid-October visit to China by President Ranil Wickremesinghe to attend a 10th anniversary summit of the Belt and Road Initiative, Beijing’s regionwide infrastructure building program. Wickremesinghe, government sources say, is due to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping to discuss debt relief.

In its statement on the review, the IMF did not point fingers. But multiple diplomatic sources from Asian and Western missions in Colombo told Nikkei Asia that China’s foot-dragging on Sri Lanka’s debt was an issue.

The fund did say that a green light for additional aid “requires the completion of financing reviews,” after scrutinizing the country’s record since the first injection of $330 million was approved in late March.

“These financing assurances reviews will focus on whether adequate progress has been made with debt restructuring to give confidence that it will be concluded in a timely manner and in line with the program’s debt target,” said the IMF team, headed by Peter Breuer, senior mission chief for Sri Lanka.

China was the last bilateral creditor to join lenders like Japan and India early this year to offer initial financial assurances that met the IMF’s conditions to approve the March bailout, an Asian diplomat revealed. “Beijing offered a two-year moratorium for the Sri Lankan debt and talked of providing new loans to pay for existing debt,” the source said on condition of anonymity.

But China balked at an April invitation to join a committee of Sri Lanka’s bilateral creditors chaired by Japan, India and France, aimed at drafting an external debt restructuring framework. Beijing opted to deal directly with the Sri Lankan government.

“The other lenders were OK with this arrangement and were prepared to let Colombo deal with Beijing at a bilateral level,” the diplomat added. “But there cannot be any special deals favoring Chinese debt terms, such as no haircuts, yet expecting haircuts from the other countries.”

Wickremesinghe — who stepped into the role of president in the middle of last year — has assured bilateral lenders of equal treatment. The incumbent then, Gotabaya Rajapaksa, had fled in the wake of unprecedented street protests driven by public anger over the collapsed economy.

“We will not have separate deals,” Wickremesinghe told Nikkei Asia in an interview in Tokyo in May. “We won’t give advantage to one party, we will work on the same principles.”

A meeting of Sri Lanka’s creditor nations held online in May was attended by 26 countries. Many were from the Paris Club, a network of wealthy nations that have a history of resolving external debt crises in developing countries to which they have given loans. China stood by only as an observer.

Within the group of countries besides China, diplomatic sources familiar with the talks revealed that concrete progress on a blueprint and timeline is still elusive. “Nothing has moved concretely within the Japan-India-French creditor committee because of no progress from China,” said one source. “So we will be following President Ranil’s visit to China closely.”

Consequently, the scope of Sri Lanka’s debt to China remains under scrutiny.

Sri Lanka ran out of foreign reserves at the end of 2021 to pay for its imports and faced pressure to service a $7 billion external debt the next year, pushing it to the brink of the worst economic crisis since independence in 1948.

By 2021, public debt stood at 114% of gross domestic product — 47% of it in the form of foreign loans, with private creditors who had bought international sovereign bonds topping that list, followed by bilateral lenders led by China.

In May 2022, Sri Lanka became the first Asian lower-middle income country to default on its sovereign debt this century.

Chinese loans had financed a spree of large infrastructure projects, including highways, an airport and a port. “China will have to play a major role in Sri Lanka’s debt restructuring process, with $7.4 billion or 19.6% of outstanding public debt owed to China at the end of 2021,” wrote Umesh Moramudali and Thilina Panduwawala, two Sri Lankan economists, in “Evolution of Chinese Lending to Sri Lanka since the mid-2000s — Separating Myth from Reality.”

Their November 2022 study, published by the U.S.-based Johns Hopkins University, observed that “China’s approach to Sri Lanka’s debt restructuring and the extent of debt relief offered will set a precedent for China’s role and behavior in other countries.”

Chinese lending to Sri Lanka mainly came from two major policy banks, China Exim Bank, which accounted for $4.3 billion, and China Development Bank, which gave $3 billion.

By contrast, interest-free loans provided directly to Sri Lanka as part of official aid from the Chinese government amounted to only $16 million by the end of 2021, said the Sri Lankan economists Moramudali and Panduwawala in an e-mail interview. “We have not come across EXIM or CDB loans that are interest-free.”

China’s opaque response to Sri Lanka’s restructuring effort has many questioning its motives.

“China appears to be taking a strategic approach rather than pursuing the Sri Lanka case from a financial position,” said Manjuka Fernandopulle, a Sri Lankan commercial lawyer advising Sri Lanka’s sovereign bond holders. “It is trying to provide an extra level of protection to its major lenders — EXIM and CDB.”

Source : NIKKEI ASAI

China stalling IMF relief for debt grip Sri Lanka: Report

(ANI): Sri Lanka’s is facing a big challenge from its largest bilateral lender, China to secure a concrete debt relief framework, as it is blocking access to desperately needed cash bailout of 3 billion US dollars’ from International Monetary fund, Nikkei Asia reported.

Last month’s visit by IMF officials to the crisis-recovering nation seems like a hope for the country. But IMF which has insisted on “financing assurances” from bilateral lenders as a key pillar, gave Sri Lanka a failing grade in the first review of the bailout, denying it a second tranche of $330 million in aid.

According to the Nikkei Asia, the chances of the relief for Sri Lanka is rising for an unexpected mid-october visit to China by Lankan President Ranil Wickremesinghe to attend a 10th anniversary summit of the Belt and Road Initiative, Beijing’s regionwide infrastructure building program where he will meet the Chinese President to discuss debt relief.

Meanwhile the IMF has said that the further relief aid requires the completion of financing reviews after analysing the country’s record since the first injection of 330 million US dollars, approved in late march.

Nekkei Asia reported quoting IMF team, headed by Peter Breuer, senior mission chief for Sri Lanka said, “These financing assurances reviews will focus on whether adequate progress has been made with debt restructuring to give confidence that it will be concluded in a timely manner and in line with the program’s debt target.”

China is one among other nations to join lendors like Japan and India early this year to offer initial financial assurances that met the IMF’s conditions to approve the March bailout, an Asian diplomat revealed.

“Beijing offered a two-year moratorium for the Sri Lankan debt and talked of providing new loans to pay for existing debt,” Nikkei Asia reported.

Notably, Sri Lanka has invited China to join a committee of country’s bilateral creditors chaired by Japan, India and France, aimed at drafting an external debt restricting framework, which China rejected in April this year. And opted to directly deal with the Sri Lankan government.

“The other lenders were OK with this arrangement and were prepared to let Colombo deal with Beijing at a bilateral level,” the diplomat added. “But there cannot be any special deals favoring Chinese debt terms, such as no haircuts, yet expecting haircuts from the other countries.”

Sri Lankan President Wickremesinghe who assumed the charge after the former president had fled from the country amid protests driven by public anger over the collapsed economy has promised to deal with all the bilateral lendors to treat them equally.

“We will not have separate deals,” Wickremesinghe told Nikkei Asia in an interview in Tokyo in May. “We won’t give advantage to one party, we will work on the same principles.”

A meeting of Sri Lanka’s creditor nations held online in May was attended by 26 countries. Many were from the Paris Club, a network of wealthy nations that have a history of resolving external debt crises in developing countries to which they have given loans. China stood by only as an observer.

Within the group of countries besides China, diplomatic sources familiar with the talks revealed that concrete progress on a blueprint and timeline is still elusive. “Nothing has moved concretely within the Japan-India-French creditor committee because of no progress from China,” said one source. “So we will be following President Ranil’s visit to China closely.”

Consequently, the scope of Sri Lanka’s debt to China remains under scrutiny.

Sri Lanka ran out of foreign reserves at the end of 2021 to pay for its imports and faced pressure to service a $7 billion external debt the next year, pushing it to the brink of the worst economic crisis since independence in 1948.

By 2021, public debt stood at 114% of gross domestic product — 47% of it in the form of foreign loans, with private creditors who had bought international sovereign bonds topping that list, followed by bilateral lenders led by China.

In May 2022, Sri Lanka became the first Asian lower-middle income country to default on its sovereign debt this century.

Chinese loans had financed a spree of large infrastructure projects, including highways, an airport and a port. “China will have to play a major role in Sri Lanka’s debt restructuring process, with $7.4 billion or 19.6% of outstanding public debt owed to China at the end of 2021,” wrote Umesh Moramudali and Thilina Panduwawala, two Sri Lankan economists, in “Evolution of Chinese Lending to Sri Lanka since the mid-2000s — Separating Myth from Reality.”
Chinese lending to Sri Lanka mainly came from two major policy banks, China Exim Bank, which accounted for $4.3 billion, and China Development Bank, which gave $3 billion.

By contrast, interest-free loans provided directly to Sri Lanka as part of official aid from the Chinese government amounted to only $16 million by the end of 2021, said the Sri Lankan economists Moramudali and Panduwawala in an e-mail interview. “We have not come across EXIM or CDB loans that are interest-free.” (ANI)

Posted in Uncategorized

Threats to judge: Northern lawyers conduct token strike, warn of continued action

Lawyers in the Northern Province launched a token strike yesterday (3) demanding a thorough investigation into threats made to Mullaitivu District Court Judge T. Saravanarajah, and measures to protect the safety of judges and the independence of the judiciary.

Lawyers in the Jaffna, Kilinochchi, Mannar, Vavuniya, and Mullaitivu Districts joined hands in this regard as part of the Northern Province bars.

Sources within the Northern Province bars told The Daily Morning that due to lawyers withdrawing from court proceedings, the daily activities of courts in the Northern Province were hampered. The Mullaitivu Lawyers’ Association said that the Mullaithivu District Lawyers will conduct a formal investigation into the threats against Saravanarajah and demand that authorities enforce the law against the concerned persons. The sources also said that a decision on a continuous strike is to be made if the authorities fail to provide them with a proper solution.

When contacted by The Daily Morning yesterday (3), Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) President attorney-at-law Kaushalya Nawaratna said that the BASL has not endorsed any such union action concerning the resignation of the said judge, but that regional bars have the independence to organise as such if they wish. He also said that the BASL is continuously pressurising law enforcement authorities to take necessary action, but that no decision has been taken so far by its Executive Committee regarding a protest or other similar union action.

Judge Saravanarajah, in a letter to the Judicial Service Commission, resigned from all his judicial posts recently, citing death threats and stress, and he has subsequently left the country. The threats are attributed to orders he has given in a controversial case concerning the Kurundi Temple. The Inspector General of Police and the Criminal Investigations Department have since been ordered to commence a probe into the resignation and circumstances of the same, while the BASL has met the Chief Justice for the same reason.

Posted in Uncategorized

SLFP not inclined to merge with SLPP– Sirisena

Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) Chairman, former President Maithripala Sirisena yesterday (3) asserted that the SLFP has no intention of merging politically with the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) and it is not possible at the moment.

During a media briefing at SLFP Headquarters, Sirisena said, “To be honest, the majority of people in the country are against the government. This is clear from the people’s reactions towards the government.”

He added that the unbearable cost of living has left the people of this country disenchanted with the government. He claimed that they (SLFP) are in the Opposition in Parliament and have their own political paths, similar to what the government has. There is no need to associate with former President Mahinda Rajapaksa, as their policies are entirely different, he claimed.

“Each political party has its own unique policies and agendas that may not align with each other. We have different political ideologies and it is not feasible for us to go on the same path. However, we do not hold any personal animosity towards any other political party or their representatives. Our differences are purely based on our political ideologies,” Sirisena said.

“As SLFP members, in accordance with our party’s general policies and objectives, we are ready to work for the country while putting aside our personal political policies and agendas in order to form alliances. The SLFP has formed numerous alliances and collaborated with other political parties, prioritising the advancement of the country over our party’s individual policies,” he said.

Ranil loses his cool when questioned on Channel 4 video

President Ranil Wickremesinghe lost his cool and threatened to walk out of an interview with Deutsche Welle after he rejected an international investigation into the Easter Sunday attacks.

The President at one point accused the host of “talking nonsense” and said that Sri Lanka does not see the need for international observers even over the war.

Wickremesinghe, at one point, suggested that the interview be stopped and that he leaves as both sides were raising their voices at each other.

During the interview, the President also said that he is not dealing with Cardinal Malcolm Ranjith but only with the Catholic Bishops’ Conference.

https://twitter.com/easwaranrutnam?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1708939841587835220%7Ctwgr%5E6d6ad401efd9e1a2a50b52835029c5aca5b5d076%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fcolombogazette.com%2F2023%2F10%2F03%2Franil-loses-his-cool-when-questioned-on-channel-4-video%2F

Posted in Uncategorized

SriLankan Airlines Suffers USD 6 Million Loss Due to Recent Flight Delays

SriLankan Airlines has reported a substantial loss of USD 6 million attributed to recent flight delays. Minister of Ports and Aviation, Nimal Siripala De Silva, announced this development today, shedding light on the financial impact of these disruptions.

Minister De Silva revealed that the airline’s losses were directly linked to the recent delays experienced in eight flights, which caused substantial inconvenience to passengers and incurred significant financial repercussions. These delays have come at a challenging time for the airline, further exacerbated by the ongoing economic constraints.

He emphasized the grim financial reality by stating that, under the current circumstances, there is no room for granting allowances or salary increases to the airline’s employees. This statement underscores the financial strain that SriLankan Airlines is currently facing.

In response to these challenges, Minister De Silva unveiled a strategic decision aimed at mitigating losses and safeguarding the interests of SriLankan Airlines. The plan involves allowing other airlines to operate some of the carrier’s flights under the ‘5th freedom of the air’ framework. This measure is intended to optimize flight operations and minimize losses while still preserving the rights and integrity of SriLankan Airlines.

Recent times have seen a series of flight delays and cancellations by SriLankan Airlines, often attributed to technical or other operational issues. These disruptions have caused inconvenience to travelers and financial losses to the national carrier.

In light of these setbacks, SriLankan Airlines publicly extended its apologies to affected passengers in the recent past, acknowledging the impact of these flight interruptions. However, the airline now faces the challenging task of overcoming these operational hurdles and navigating the complex aviation landscape to regain its financial stability.

Supreme Court issues notice on Election Commission members

The Supreme Court today (02) ordered to once again issue notice on the new chairman and the members of the Election Commission to appear before the court.

This order was issued by a five-member Supreme Court bench, when the petitions seeking an order declaring that the fundamental human rights of the people have been violated by the failure to hold the 2023 LG election on March 09, 2023, as previously scheduled, and to issue an order to the election body to hold the relevant election on time, were taken up for consideration today (02).

The petitions were filed by the National People’s Power (NPP), Samagi Jana Balavegaya (SJB), the Centre for Policy Alternatives and the People’s Action for Free and Fair Elections (PAFFREL), naming the Chairman and the members of the election commission as respondents.

Chief Justice Jayantha Jayasuriya, Justices Priyantha Jayawardena, Vijith Malalgoda, Murdu Fernando and Gamini Amarasekara had comprised the five-member judge bench which issued this order.

There, President’s Counsel Nigel Hatch, who appeared on behalf of the NPP, requested the court for an early date for hearing of the petition since the fundamental human rights of the people are violated by the postponement of the election.

At the time, the Chief Justice mentioned that although the hearing of the relevant petitions was scheduled to be held today, a situation had arisen where it is not possible to carry out the hearing due to the fact that the petitioners had not properly issued notice to the respondents.

The Chief Justice further emphasized that not only the petitions related to the local government polls but also the facts related to each and every petition presented to the court will be considered in depth.

Accordingly, the judge bench ordered the petitioning party to issue notices to the new members of the Election Commission and former member of the commission P.S.M. Charles, who were added to the list of respondents of the petitions, within a period of one week.

Later, the relevant petitions were ordered to be recalled for hearing on November 21, 22, 29, 30 and December 01, 2023.

HRCSL’s dire warning against the proposed ‘Online Safety Bill’

In a letter penned by Chairman of the the Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka (HRCSL) former Supreme Court Judge Lakshman Tikiri Bandara Dehideniya, the Government has been urged to exercise caution in its approach to the proposed Online Safety Bill (OSB). The letter, addressed to Minister of Public Security Tiran Alles, emphasises the importance of safeguarding fundamental rights while addressing the challenges posed by online spaces.

The HRCSL’s recommendations touch on critical aspects of the bill, including the misapplication of existing laws, concerns over political independence, and the need for clear criteria in classifying online accounts. One of the most striking points in the letter is the acknowledgement of the significance of making online spaces safer for Sri Lankans. While the objective is laudable, the HRCSL underscores the challenges faced by law enforcement authorities in interpreting and applying current criminal laws to online activities.

The misapplication of section 3 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) Act, No. 56 of 2007, is cited as a prime example, raising doubts about its effectiveness in addressing online incitement to violence and the potential for stifling free speech. Despite previous notifications to authorities regarding this issue, the misapplication of the ICCPR Act continues, as evidenced by a recent High Court case. These concerns have led the HRCSL to propose a reconsideration of the timing of the OSB.

The HRCSL argues that strengthening the institutional capacity of law enforcement authorities should precede the introduction of new legislation, highlighting the risk of jeopardising freedom of speech and expression without such reforms. The HRCSL has also presented a series of general observations and recommendations aimed at ensuring that the OSB aligns with the fundamental rights chapter of the constitution. These include refraining from criminalising statements deemed merely “distressing,” ensuring the political independence of the proposed Online Safety Commission (OSC), and revising procedures to afford individuals an opportunity to be heard.

Additionally, the letter notes the need for clear criteria in classifying ‘inauthentic online accounts’ while preserving online user freedoms and cautions against vesting police powers in private actors assisting investigations. HRCSL plans to engage with relevant stakeholders to further refine its observations and recommendations on the proposed OSB. In doing so, the HRCSL aims to strike a balance between online safety and the protection of fundamental rights in Sri Lanka’s evolving digital landscape.