76% say ‘No’ to Ranil joining Rajapaksas for Presidential poll

Nearly 76% of voters in Daily Mirror’s poll were of the opinion that President Ranil Wickremesinghe should not team up with the Rajapaksas in the upcoming Presidential elections.

The question asked of respondents was, “Amidst recent criticism by Basil Rajapaksa on the breakaway faction of the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP)- who have joined the government- should Ranil Wickremesinghe team up with the Rajapaksas and contest the next elections?

Of a total of 1,645 respondents, nearly 76% voted ‘No’, nearly 21% voted ‘Yes’, while nearly 3% voted ‘Do Not Know’.

The poll followed the reports that surfaced last month of the founder of Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) Basil Rajapaksa having informed his party’s breakaway group at a meeting also attended by President Wickremesinghe that the Rajapaksas were not ready to cow down to any pressure.

He had reportedly delivered these remarks when Minister of Housing and Urban Development Prasanna Ranatunga – a breakaway member of the party backing President Wickremesinghe – had informed the same meeting that there is a request from other parties and groups for the accommodation of the SLPP for a broad alliance sans the members of the Rajapaksa family.

Meanwhile, on Saturday (27), President Ranil Wickremesinghe officially announced his candidacy for the upcoming Presidential election during a rally in Galle

Posted in Uncategorized

Ruling regime cracks over Presidential candidacy

In a significant blow to the ruling Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP), a group of party MPs have announced they would defy the party’s decision to field its own candidate and instead support President Ranil Wickremesinghe in his bid for re-election.

Following a party politburo meeting, it was officially announced yesterday that the SLPP will break ties with President Ranil Wickremesinghe and field its own candidate in the upcoming election.

Speaking to the media SLPP General Secretary Sagara Kariyawasam clai-med the majority of members agreed on fielding a candidate under the SLPP ticket and the lotus bud symbol. Consequently, the SLPP will withdraw its support for Wickremesinghe in the election.

Kariyawasam acknowledged that the party has been lenient with members attending rallies of other politicians but said it was agreed to take disciplinary action against such members if this behaviour continues.

“While some objected to the party’s decision, a majority accepted it. If any party member opposes this decision or contests the Presidential Election without the party’s approval, disciplinary action will be initiated against them,” MP Kariyawasam added. He said only a few members opposed the party’s stance.

Taking to X, SLPP National Organiser Namal Rajapaksa said with the party’s decision to field their own candidate, they also acknowledge past challenges and commit to unity, economic stability, and restoring trust. “United, we will advance Sri Lanka with renewed purpose and strength,” he said.

Reports about the attendance at the politburo meeting were also conflicting. Some sources claim that 79 out of 82 SLPP members attended, with only 11 opposing the party’s decision to field its own candidate.

However, political commentators noted that the SLPP politburo is primarily composed of Namal Rajapaksa loyalists, while the SLPP Parliamentary group is not part of the politburo. According to these commentators, at least 80 MPs are currently extending their support to Wickremesinghe.

Meanwhile, despite Namal Rajapaksa’s claims of unity and threats of disciplinary action, a group of SLPP MPs announced their decision to continue their support of Wickremesinghe.

The announcement was made after the group consisting of MPs and Ministers convened at United National Party (UNP) MP Wajira Abeywardana’s election office in Flower Road last night. The meeting headed by President Ranil Wickremesinghe had SLPP stalwarts including Deputy Speaker Ajith Rajapakse, Ministers Kanchana Wijesekara, Tiran Alles, Geetha Kumarasinghe, Anupa Pasqual, Dilum Amunugama, MPs Mahindananda Aluthgamage, S.B. Dissanayake, Premanatha C. Dolawatte and others in attendance.

Speaking to the media, Minister Anupa Pasqual said the group will remain in the SLPP but continue to support Wickremesinghe. “His victory is assured,” he said.

When asked by the media if his political career with the SLPP is nearing its end, Amunugama responded that it appeared so. However, he suggested that a majority of SLPP members support Wickremesinghe, while only a few have agreed to field a different candidate.

S.B. Dissanayake said the group has always believed Wickremesinghe is the best candidate for the Presidency. He insisted that all Ministers, except for a few State Ministers, have extended their support to Wickremesinghe, claiming that “90% of the MPs are with the President.”

Meanwhile, Minister Kanchana Wijesekara said the group will continue to advocate for Wickremesinghe and attempt to gain SLPP leader Mahinda Rajapaksa’s support for him. Wijesekara emphasised that they do not want the party to split, but if they cannot convince the leadership, the group will still support Wickremesinghe. He suggested there is an attempt to cause the party a massive defeat by fielding a different candidate.

Welikada massacre remembered across North-East

Several events were held across the North-East this week to mark 41 years since the Welikada massacre, in which 53 Tamil political prisoners were murdered by Sinhala inmates and prison guards.

The massacre took place during the Black July pogrom of 1983.

Mannar

The head of the Tamil Eelam Liberation Movement (TELO) Selvam Adaikalanathan while attending a memorial for the Tamils who were massacred in the Welikada massacre said that there elements in the South of Sri Lanka who were planning and staging events aimed at erasing the history of Eelam Tamils

“We should not lose our people and our land due to our lack of unity,” he said speaking at an event held in Mannar to mark a commemoration of the Welikada Massacre. The event was held at the TELO office where several Tamils gathered to pay their respects and honor them. “Even though TELO lost its members who propelled the movement, we are now working with five other parties so that we can remain united for the cause of the Tamil aspiration.”

He appealed for all members and Tamil political parties to unite so they can avert the ethnic cleansing and the ruination of the Tamil homeland by forces from Sri Lanka’s South.

Jaffna

A memorial was held at the Father Chelva Hall in Jaffna this week to commemorate the 41st annivesary of the massacre.

The event was organized by the Democratic Tamil National Alliance to remember the lives of 53 Tamil prisoners who were massacared within the Welikada jail. Relatives of those who were killed led the memorial lighting candles and laying floral wreaths. Several members of the DTNA including Dharmalingam Siddarthan, Suresh Premachandran and N. Srikanth were present during the event.

Vavuniya

A similar trubute was held in Vavuniya. At the event, Nadarajah Thangavelu, alias Thangathurai, the co-founding leaders of TLO (Tamil Liberation Organisation) was honored along with Commander Guttimani and combatant Jagan. The event was led by Vavuniya district organizer of TELO, while several members took part in the event.

Colombo

Marking the commemoration, Tamil National People’s Front (TNPF) MP Selvarajah Kajendran met with Tamil political prisoners who are still behind bars at the Welikada Prison in Colombo.

Speaking to reporters he said that these prisoners have been behind bars for over 29 years. “It has been 41 years since the Welikada Massacre, which took place at this very prison. Today we came to prisoners who are yearning to be released and we call on the government to secure their release. They have called on Tamils at home and around the world to help secure their release.”

On the 25th July 1983 Sellarasa “Kuttimani” Yogachandiran, leader of the Tamil Eelam Liberation Organisation (TELO) and Ganeshanathan Jeganathan, a political writer, had their eyes gouged out in mockery before being killed by Sinhalese inmates at the high security Welikada prison in Colombo.

A total of 37 Tamil prisoners were murdered the same day, and 18 more were killed two days later.

In 1976, Kuttimani’s name appeared on the list of 47 Tamil prisoners held without trial under Emergency Regulations. Martin Ennals of Amnesty International had constructed the Report of Amnesty International Mission (Jan 1975), indicating that Kuttimani was a “prisoner whose case is under investigation by Amnesty International”. The report further discloses that Kuttimani was kept in Welikada and was arrested in August 1975. He was released in 1977.

On March 21st, 1981, Neervely’s Bank robbery of 8 million Sri Lankan rupees led the Sri Lankan police officials to accuse Kuttimani as the orchestrator. He was arrested on April 5, 1981, along with Thangathurai and Selvadurai Sivasubramaniam alias, Devan, while bidding to escape in a boat to Tamil Nadu. The following year, in August, Kuttimani and Jegan were served a death sentence by the Colombo High Court, under the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA).

Ganeshanathan Jeganathan, nicknamed Jegan was a political writer and an early member of TELO. He hailed from Thondaimanaru. The abrupt death of TULF’s Vaddukoddai MP T. Thirunavukkarasu in 1982, allowed an open seat for Kuttimani. The then-leader of TULF, A. Amirthalingam informed the Elections Commissioner of his decision to nominate Kuttimani as the new MP of Vaddukoddai. But then Prisons Commissioner Priya Delgoda announced on 16 October 1982 that Kuttimani would not be released from prison to take his oaths at the parliament, legally disqualifying him from membership.

On November 2nd, 1981, the trials of Kuttimani, Thangathurai, and Devan began under the Sri Lanka Prevention of Terrorism Act. The outcome of the trial was a death sentence. Famously, Kuttimani stated:

“I request that I should be hanged in Tamil Eelam… I request that my eyes be donated to some blind person so that Kuttimani will be able to see through those eyes the reality of Tamil Eelam”.

Whilst their trials were still pending, Kuttimani and Thangathurai were brutally murdered in Welikada Maximum Security Prison.

Kuttimani’s tormentors “gouged out” his eyes – an allusion to the request that he had made. According to Amnesty International, the Sinhala prisoners were offered alcohol and permitted to attack the Tamil prisoners.

See an extract from The Guardian, on 5th August 1983, below:

‘It is the massacres in the Welikade gaol which are attracting the most attention. There is a particular interest in circumstances in which two alleged guerrilla leaders were killed.

The two men, Sellarasa “Kuttimani” Yogachandiran, leader of the Tamil Eelam Liberation Organization (TELO) and a political writer, and Ganeshanathan Jeganathan had been sentenced to death last year for the murder of a policeman.

In speeches from the dock, the two men had announced that they would donate their eyes in the hope that they would be grafted on to Tamils who would see the birth of Eelam, the independent state they were fighting for.

Second hand reports from Batticaloa gaol, where the survivors of the Welikada massacre are now being kept, say that the two men were forced to kneel and their eyes gouged out with iron bars before they were killed.

One version has it that Kuttimani’s tongue was cut out by an attacker who drank the blood and cried: “I have drunk the blood of a Tiger.”

The two men were among the 35 Tamils killed in the Welikada gaol on July 25. Another 17 were killed in the gaol two days later and the Guardian has obtained a first hand account of part of the fighting in this incident, including the circumstances in which Sri Lanka’s Gandhian leader, Dr. Rajasunderam, died.

Dr. Rajasunderam was one of nine men, including two Catholic priests and a Methodist minister, who were moved out of their cells immediately after the July 25 killings—to make way for survivors moved into their cells on security grounds—into a padlocked hall, upstairs in the same block.

The nine, convinced that further attacks were coming, made repeated representations to the prison authorities on July 26 for better security measures. Assurances were given that they would be protected, but nothing was done.

At 2:30 pm in July 27, hearing screaming and whistling outside, one of the priests looked out of a high window and saw prisoners breaking in from a neighboring compound, wielding axes, iron bars, pieces of firewood, and sticks. There was no sign of the prison guards.

The mob, which was later found to have killed 16 prisoners in the downstairs cells, ran up to the hall and began breaking the padlock. Dr. Rajasunderam then went to the door and cried out: “Why are you trying to kill us? What have we done to you?” At that moment, the door burst open and Dr. Rajasunderam was hit on the side of the neck by a length of iron. Blood was seen to spurt several feet.

“At that juncture, we thought we should defend ourselves,” one of the prisoners related. “We broke the two tables in the hall and took the legs to defend ourselves.” “We kept them at bay. They threw bricks at us. We threw them back. Pieces of firewood and an iron bar were thrown at us. We used them to defend ourselves. It went on for about half an hour. They shouted: ‘You are the priests, we must kill you.’”

The killing was eventually ended by the army, who moved in with teargas. An inquest has been opened into the Welikada massacres, but the above details did not emerge. Prison warders claim that keys to the cells were stolen from them.

Lawyers for the prisoners who have accused the warders of having participated, claim that they were not given the opportunity to bring evidence despite representation to the Government.’

The International Commission of Jurists commented:

“It is not clear how it was possible for the killings to take place without the connivance of prison officials, and how the assassinations could have been repeated after an interval of two days, since Welikade prison is a high security prison and the Tamil prisoners were kept in separate cells…”

Along with Kuttimani and Thangathurai, the Tamil prisoners who were massacred in Welikada on 25th July 1983 were:

Nadesathasan, Jegan, Alias Sivarasa, Sivan Anpalagan, A. Balasubramaniam, Surash Kumar, Arunthavarajah, Thanapalasingham, Arafat, Anpalagan Sunduran, P. Mahendran, Ramalingam Balachandran, K. Thillainathan, K. Thavarajasingham, S. Subramaniam, Mylvaganam Sinnaiah, G. Mylvaganam, Ch. Sivanantharajah, T. Kandiah, S. Sathiyaseelan, Kathiravelpillai, Easvaranathan, K. Nagarajah, Gunapalan Ganeshalingam, S. Kularajasekaram, K. Krishnakumar, K. Uthaya Kumar, R. Yoganathan, S. Sivakumar, A. Uthayakumar, A. Rajan, G. Amirthalingam, S. Balachandran, V. Chandrakumar, Yogachandran Killi, Sittampalam Chandrakulam and Master Navaratnam Sivapatham

SLPP decides not to support Ranil at prez poll, to field own candidate

The Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) will not support current President Ranil Wickremesinghe in the forthcoming Presidential Election, SLPP MP Sagara Kariyawasam said.

Meanwhile, he said that the Politburo of the SLPP decided to field a Presidential Candidate of its own.

Furthermore, Kariyawasam expressed that the party will further look into qualified individuals to contest for the presidency and that the person with the most likelihood to win will officially be named the candidate of the SLPP during the upcoming days.

Meanwhile, the SLPP politburo has decided to take strict disciplinary action against any member of the SLPP contesting for the 2024 Presidential Election without the party’s approval.

In response to a question raised by a journalist whether it was not too late to delay the nomination of a candidate, Kariyawasam said that they would name the “winning candidate” at the “winning time”.

Commenting further he said: “There was an exchange of ideas that we should field a candidate under the symbol of the flower bud. A few members opposed that, but the majority was in favour of that decision. So, it was passed with a majority vote to field a separate candidate.”

On Friday (26), the election deposit was placed on behalf of President Ranil Wickremesinghe to contest the 2024 Presidential Election as an independent candidate.

The Presidential Election will be held on September 21 and Nominations will be accepted on August 15, 2024.

Mahinda wholeheartedly agrees if party decides to support Ranil

Leader of the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) Mahinda Rajapaksa said he would agree wholeheartedly if the party decides to support incumbent Ranil Wickremesinghe at the presidential polls.

Speaking to journalists on Sunday (28), the former President said that the party will make the decision and the announcement would come today (29).

Posted in Uncategorized

Election Commission requests funds of Rs. 8.5 billion for the Presidential Election

The Ministry of Finance says that the Election Commission has requested funds of Rs. 8.5 billion for the presidential election.

A senior spokesperson to the finance ministry confirmed that steps are being taken to release these funds promptly.

A budget allocation of Rs. 10 billion has been set aside for the 2024 Presidential Election.

Meanwhile, President Ranil Wickremesinghe has instructed the Ministry of Finance to release the necessary funds for the Election.

A senior official of the finance ministry confirmed that the President has directed that the funds be released without any delay.

Posted in Uncategorized

EU continues proscription of the LTTE

The Council of the European Union (EU) will continue the proscription of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) for a further six months, Sri Lanka’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said.

The EU on July 26, “renewed the list of persons, groups and entities set out by the Common Position 2001/931/CFSP with the view to combatting terrorism, and the LTTE continues to be banned in the EU for a further period of six months,” an statement by the ministry said.

Proscribed persons, groups and entities are subject to the freezing of its funds and other financial assets or economic resources in EU member states.

“It is also prohibited for EU entities to make funds and economic resources available to the proscribed organisations.”

Posted in Uncategorized

Presidential Election 2024: Notice for postal voting applicants

The applications to cast postal votes must be handed over to District Returning Officers on or before August 05, the Election Commission announced.

Accordingly, all applications of the postal voting applicants must be forwarded to the relevant District Returning Officers through the District Election Office address.

The commission announced that the application forms to be completed for availing the postal voting facility can be obtained free of charge from the places where the voters’ lists are displayed, from the district election offices and also from the website of the Election Commission.

Furthermore, the Election Commission informs the general public that the applications must be received by the respective District Election Offices before 12.00 midnight on August 05, which is the last day of applications receipt and mere delivery of applications by post on that day is not a reason for acceptance of applications.

The applications received after the deadline will be rejected without consideration, as per the Election Commission.

The Election regulatory body further mentioned that the 2024 voters’ list must be displayed at the relevant government offices for the ease of the postal voters.

Thus, all certified voters’ lists related to all the electoral districts will be displayed at the following locations during usual office hours from July 26, 2024.

– All District Secretariats/ Kachcheris
– All Divisional Secretariats
– All Grama Niladhari Offices

Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe resigns as Justice Minister

Minister of Justice, Prisons Affairs and Constitutional Reforms Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe has stepped down from his ministerial position.

Rajapakshe announced this decision while speaking at a press conference being held in Colombo today (29).

Dr. Rajapakshe says he will step down from his ministerial position, to run for the Office of President in the upcoming election.

Posted in Uncategorized

How will second, third preferences matter in case no candidate gets over 50%?

At every presidential election , it is a common phenomenon to see a dozen of candidates or more. Still the contest narrows down to two main candidates and the third one becomes a distant third as per the results of the previous elections.

The candidate who polls more than 50 percent of votes is declared winner. However , it is a tricky situation in case no candidate secures more than 50 percent of votes. Then it leads to the counting of second and third preferences marked , by the election authorities.

This is how it is done , according to former Election Commission’s Chairman Mahinda Deshapriya and former member of the Commission M. M. Mohamed.

Let’s take for example ! There are five candidates named A, B, C D and E with the total number of valid votes polled by all of them being 100. Let’s assume that A has 40, B 35, C 15 , D six and E 4!

In this instance , the contest is between A and B as the candidates coming first and second . They are considered remaining candidates. The second or third preferences marked in their ballot papers are longer considered for counting in the second round because they are now the only remaining candidates whereas the others are eliminated from the contest .

As the next step ,ballot papers marked for C are considered one by one . In case , a voter has marked his first preference to C and second to A or B, it will be considered as a vote for A or B. Then , this ballot paper is inserted into the ballot box meant for A or B. The third preference marked in this ballot paper is not considered. Also a ballot paper marked for C as first choice bears second or third preferences to D or E, it will not also be considered because these two are not in the contest or are eliminated candidates.

Likewise, in the event of a voter marking first preference to C, second to D or E and third to A or B, it will be considered a vote to A or B as third preference .

In this manner , like ballot papers cast for C, the ones marked for D and E are checked for second and third preferences validly marked for A and B as the remaining candidates .

That way , let’s assume that A gets three additional votes with his total moving up to 43 and B ten more votes now with a total of 45. The grand total is now 88 . Out of it , B gets more than 50 percent and is declared President. If any of the two does not get additional votes after counting second and third preferences , the candidate ‘A’who has the highest number in the first round itself will be declared winner.

Also , if both of them get equal number of votes finally , the Election Commission can resort to a raffle draw to select the winner .

Voters can mark their preferences as 1, 2 or 3 in front of the symbols of the candidates of their choice .