Ranil’s three-stage return and rise to the top

There were many in Sri Lanka and abroad who thought the political life of Ranil Wickremesinghe had been laid to rest after the August 2020 parliamentary elections. The United National Party (UNP) that had Wickremesinghe at the helm for more than 25 years was routed at the polls. For the first time since its inception, the UNP failed to get even one MP elected. The UNP was able to garner only 249,435 (2.15%) votes throughout the Island.

In Colombo district where Ranil Wickremesinghe contested the UNP got only 30,875 (2.61%). Ranil’s share of the preference votes is not known but it is surmised that it would have been less than 15,000. It was a terrible downfall for the UNP leader and five times prime minister whose personal tally at the previous 2015 parliamentary election had been a record breaking 500,566. Also Ranil had never suffered defeat in an election from the time he first entered Parliament as an MP in July 1977.

Viewed against this dismal backdrop, there was much merit in the opinion articulated by political observers and analysts that the 2020 electoral verdict had written the political obituary of the UNP in general and Ranil Wickremesinghe in particular. This may very well have been the case but for two factors. The first was the remarkable resilience, tenacity and political courage of Ranil Wickremesinghe. The second was the consolation prize received by the UNP in the form of a national list MP. The silver lining for the UNP, in the dark cloud of electoral defeat, was that the overall votes gained by the party at the polls, entitled it to a solitary national list MP post.

What has been happening thereafter amounts to an unbelievable exhibition of political wizardry, Wickremesinghe utilised the national list MP slot to engineer a political renaissance. Ten months after the disastrous 2020 election, Ranil Wickremesinghe re-entered Parliament on 23 June 2021 as the UNP national list MP. On 12 May 2022, the lone UNP parliamentarian was appointed Prime Minister by President Gotabaya Rajapaksa. Ten weeks later on 21 July 2022, Ranil Wickremesinghe was sworn in by Chief Justice Jayantha Jayasuriya as the eighth executive president of Sri Lanka. Ranil had been elected president by 134 of 225 MPs in Parliament on 20 July. The poll had been necessitated by the resignation of Gotabaya Rajapaksa.

Thus Ranil Wickremesinghe – for whose political life the death knell had been seemingly rung after the 2020 poll – demonstrated to the world at large that reports of his political demise have been greatly exaggerated as stated once by Mark Twain. In the words of the bard of Avon quoted at the beginning, Ranil has “taken the tide in the affairs of men, at the flood, on to fortune.” In a deft display of strategic calculation and tactical manoeuvring, Ranil Wickremesinghe has reached the pinnacle of power from the depths of defeat.

Ranil’s return and rise to the top in three stages as Parliamentarian, Premier and President will be related in detail in this two-part article. This does not mean that this column necessarily approves or disapproves of what Ranil has done or is doing. This narrative merely places the contours of Ranil’s three-stage political renaissance in perspective. Some of these matters have been related to some extent in my articles in our sister paper “Daily Mirror”. I shall be drawing from those for this article if and when necessary.

 

August 2020 Parliamentary Election

Politically resilient Ranil Wickremesighe’s return to power has indeed been remarkable. The advent of the August 2020 parliamentary election saw Ranil’s erstwhile deputy leader Sajith Premadasa staging a “coup” and forming the “Samagiya Jana Balawegaya” (SJB). The SJB contested elections under the telephone symbol. Most MP’UNP hitched their wagon to the Premadasa star. Political party allies of the UNP such as the Sri Lanka Muslim Congress (SLMC) Tamil Progressive Alliance (TPA) and the All Ceylon Makkal Congress (ACMC) also switched sides.

The grand old party tasted ignominious defeat at the 2020 Parliamentary poll. The UNP led front obtained 106 seats at the 2015 elections but in 2020 the party failed to get even one MP elected. The UNP polled only 249,435 (2.15%) votes. No MP was elected. Adding insult to injury was Ranil Wickremesinghe’s personal debacle. The UNP leader who had not lost an election from the time he entered Parliament in 1977 was trounced in Colombo district.

Under the proportional representation electoral system the votes it garnered enabled the UNP to nominate a single MP on the national list. Ranil declined nomination and left it to the party to decide upon another nominee. There was keen competition among the UNP stalwarts – who had stood by Ranil through thick and thin – to be appointed as MP on the national list. So much so that the party was in danger of fragmenting again. Finally there emerged a consensus that the UNP leader should be appointed national list MP. Ranil relented and took his oaths as the sole UNP parliamentarian on 23 June 2021.

Sole UNP national list MP

The UNP national list MP episode was illustrative of Ranil’s astute political skills in two aspects. Ranil may very well have desired the national list MP seat though outwardly posturing as not being interested. This led to an intricate situation where the party could not agree upon a nominee and instead opting for Ranil unanimously. The protracted wrangling within party folds to agree upon an alternative to Ranil in the form of a national list MP and the broad consensus reached in appointing him as MP strongly indicated the indispensability of Wickremesinghe to the UNP at this juncture. There would be no potential aspirant to party leadership as is usual after massive electoral loss.

The second aspect was the timing of his re-entry to Parliament. The 2020 Parliamentary election was a terrible defeat for the UNP in general and Wickremesinghe in particular. In 1956 the party got 8 seats in a Parliament of 101 MPs. In 1970 the UNP got 17 seats in a Parliament of 157 MPs. But in 2020 the UNP had only one seat in a Parliament of 225 MPs. It was a crushing defeat.

It may have indeed been very humiliating for Ranil to enter Parliament in such a situation. He may have been harangued mercilessly by both sides in Parliament and the media. The delay in making his re-entry to Parliament made a huge difference. By that time the sheen had worn off both the Government and opposition in Parliament. The lacklustre performance of Sajith Premadasa as leader of the opposition disappointed many. Ranil was sorely missed. He had been a fixture in Parliament since 1977.

Ranil’s re-entry to Parliament

So when Ranil made his Parliamentary re-entry there was no major hullabaloo. Of course there were some jibes and taunts but nothing significant. Soon Ranil began making his presence felt in Parliament. He made many positive contributions. Sadly the country was plunged into an unprecedented economic crisis but those in power kept dilly-dallying.

Wickremesinghe offered valuable suggestions to cope with the economic crisis. These ranged from going to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to setting up a consortium of countries to help garner more financial aid for Sri Lanka. He also kept warning of acute food shortages and an imminent collapse of the economy. These were not heeded and Ranil was ignored like a voice in the wilderness by the powers that be.

Wickremesinghe made a tremendous impression by participating in the all-party conference convened by former President Gotabaya Rajapaksa to discuss ways and means of dealing with the economic crisis. The chief opposition SJB with 54 MPs boycotted it but the sole MP of the UNP was at the conference. Ranil Wickremesinghe’s exchanges with Ajith Nivard Cabraal exposed the shallow economic policies of the then Central Bank Governor and demonstrated the UNP leader’s better grasp of the economic malady afflicting the nation. When Cabraal resorted to personal attacks, Gotabaya himself apologised publicly to Ranil.

“Gota Go Home” protests

Even as the economic crisis worsened there were widespread shortages of essentials like fuel, gas, food and medicine and enhanced power cuts. People began protesting. The “Gota Go Home” protests at Galle Face Green and its impact transformed the political environment. President Rajapaksa resorted to multiple measures to tackle the situation. While refusing to quit on the basis that he had a mandate given by 69 lakhs of people at the 2019 presidential poll, Gotabaya effected several changes in the government. He replaced the older cabinet of senior ministers with a new one of younger ministers. He fired many officials including Cabraal and appointed a new Central Bank Governor. A team of eminent economists was appointed as advisers. Colombo began interacting with the IMF and World Bank.

Gota also invited opposition parties to help form a new multi-party Government. But the SJB and JVP rebuffed Gota. They insisted that Gotabaya Rajapaksa must resign first and emphasised they would not serve in any Government under President Gotabaya Rajapaksa. In a controversial move Gotabaya began pressuring his brother and former President Mahinda Rajapaksa to resign as Prime Minister to pave the way for a new premier being appointed. The other members of the Rajapaksa clan in Government had all resigned earlier. Mahinda resisted the call to resign. There was a stalemate while a cold war ensued between both brothers.

Events however began overtaking. A meeting was held on 9 May at “Temple Trees” where SLPP members assembled in large numbers and urged Mahinda not to resign. Subsequently some of these “supporters” went on the rampage against the protesters opposite “Temple Trees” and at Galle Face. The protesters were viciously assaulted by the armed SLPP mob which also demolished the structures constructed by protesters. Some SLPP MPs were involved in the attacks. The anti-protest violence itself had been allegedly planned and encouraged by key SLPP personalities.

Counter violence by anti-SLPP mobs

After the initial shock, there was a huge backlash. While the attacks on the protests were universally condemned there erupted counter violence. Anti-SLPP mobs began unleashing violence. The SLPP supporters suspected of being involved in the attack were in turn attacked by organised groups. Some were manhandled and dumped in the Beira Lake. Some of the vehicles in which the supporters were transported to Colombo were identified and destroyed. SLPP Polonnaruwa MP Amarakeerthi Athukorala was set upon by a mob at Nittambuwa and beaten to death along with his personal security officer. Nightfall saw further terror. The residences and businesses owned by many SLPP ministers, state ministers, MPs and prominent party supporters were besieged by mobs. The buildings were looted and set on fire. The Police, STF and military seemed unable or unwilling to curb the violence. Some attacks continued on the next day too. Houses, buildings, businesses and vehicles belonging to over 70 SLPP parliamentarians including present and past ministers were totally demolished or extensively damaged.

Beleaguered premier Mahinda Rajapaksa

Mahinda Rajapaksa had earlier been reluctant to step down as Prime Minister. When news of the attacks on protesters by SLPP mobs was known, Mahinda submitted his resignation. This was immediately accepted by Gotabaya. It was a terrible night for Mahinda and his family. Large crowds gathered outside “Temple Trees” and surrounded the premises on all sides. The beleaguered Mahinda Rajapaksa family was marooned within the “Araliya” abode.

Worse still were the sustained efforts by sections of the mob to enter the premises and attack Mahinda. The gates were breached and mobs stormed in. An arson attack was launched. Around 20 Molotov Cocktails or Petrol bombs were thrown at the building. The fire was doused. Tear gas was fired repeatedly to disperse the mobs. Shots were fired in the air. Finally Mahinda and Namal Rajapaksa with their families were evacuated by helicopter to the Trincomalee naval base. In a further development the ancestral house of the Rajapaksas at Medamulna was attacked and destroyed. So too was the memorial dedicated to the parents of Chamal, Mahinda, Gotabaya and Basil.

There seemed to be no government in existence. Political instability was at its lowest point. All this while the country was in the grip of a debilitating economic crisis. Political stability was essential in negotiations seeking financial assistance from the IMF and World Bank. The newly appointed Central Bank Governor Dr. Nandalal Weerasinghe held a media conference where he warned that unless political stability was urgently restored there was no hope for Sri Lanka to get out of the economic morass. Dr. Weerasinghe threatened to quit as Central Bank governor and return to Australia if the situation was not rectified within a few days.

New Prime Minister needed

President Gotabaya Rajapaksa was in a terrible quandary. Although he was refusing to resign as president, Gota’s credibility and effectiveness was practically nil. He was legally the President but seemed to lack legitimacy in the fast changing political environment. Furthermore Sri Lanka was in dire economic straits. Something had to be done urgently to salvage the economy. For all this a new and efficient prime minister was needed.

When Gota conferred with a few advisers and aides he was told that the most suitable person available among the 225 MPs in Parliament was Ranil Wickremesinghe. Moreover Ranil was acceptable to the international community as well as the global financial institutions. But there was a problem. Gota had had a conversation with Ranil prior to Mahinda’s resignation. In that exchange Ranil had reportedly asked Gota to resign as President. This was not to Gota’s liking.

So President Gotabaya Rajapaksa turned to other alternatives. A choice Gota was very much in favour of was former speaker Karu Jayasuriya but unfortunately he was not an MP. There had been news reports that SJB national list MP Mayantha Dissanayake was going to resign his post so that Karu could be nominated. Mayantha’s brother and former minister Navin Dissanayake is the son in law of Karu Jayasuriya. This resignation however did not take place and there have been reports that SJB leader Sajith Premadasa had vetoed the move.

Gota approached former friend and ex-comrade at arms Field Marshall Sarath Fonseka. The former Army commander turned MP was now a political foe. Nevertheless Gota felt a strong man like Fonseka was needed to handle the violence and collapse of law and order. There was a meeting where Sarath Fonseka reportedly accompanied by Parliamentarian Diana Gamage engaged in talks with Gota. Fonseka however declined to accept Gota’s offer and told the President that he should resign first as a prerequisite. Friend turned foe Sarath Fonseka was unwilling to work as Premier with Gota in the saddle as President.

Gotabaya in sheer desperation turned once again to the Leader of the Opposition. Sajith Premadasa once again refused to be Prime Minister with Gotabaya as President. “Resign first” said Sajith. He was encouraged in this uncompromising intransigence by the cabal of multi-party MPs surrounding him.

With Sajith Premadasa spurning his offer again President Rajapaksa was compelled to turn to Ranil Wickremesinghe. There were lengthy conversations between Gota and Ranil. The chief facilitators were a key official at the presidential secretariat and a high-ranking office-bearer of the UNP.

Tactical shift in Ranil’s stance

Earlier when Mahinda was yet the premier, Wickremesinghe had been asked by the media whether he was planning to join the SLPP led Government; Ranil had retorted, “Why should I get aboard a sinking ship? He had also opined to Gota before that the President should resign. But now Ranil Wickremesinghe made a tactical shift in his stance. He was aware that his political bete noire Sajith Premadasa had declined Gota’s offer twice. Ranil recognised an “opening” here and seized the opportunity.

Ranil revised his earlier position that Gota should quit. Instead of asking Gota to resign, Ranil secured an assurance from the President that the “Gota Go Home” protests should be allowed to continue and not be suppressed. The President reportedly agreed. Obviously the logical conclusion of the “Gota Go Home” protest could only result in Gotabaya going home. What Ranil seemed to have calculated then, was that the “Gota Go Home” protest would ultimately result in Gota resigning. Where Wickremesinghe differed from Premadasa and Fonseka and others was that he did not insist upon Gota quitting as a pre-condition. His shrewd assessment of the situation was that the continuing protests would ultimately succeed in forcing Gota’s resignation.

The second assurance Ranil obtained from Gota was a reduction in Presidential powers. The 21st Amendment would be introduced to bring back the 19 A to replace 20 A. However there would be no Presidential or Parliamentary election until political and economic stability was restored. An agreement was arrived at between Gota and Ranil. Upon hearing that Ranil could become premier, Sajith Premadasa contacted Gota and informed the President that he would re-consider the offer under certain amended conditions. Gota informed Sajith politely that he had already decided to appoint Ranil Wickremesinghe as Prime Minister.

Prime Minister for the sixth time

Ranil Wickremesinghe the lone UNP parliamentarian was sworn in as Prime Minister for the sixth time on 12 May 2022. The appointment caused much controversy. What happened thereafter including the resignation of Gota, burning of Ranil’s residence by protesters, the ascension of Ranil as President and the positive and negative acts of omission and commission by the eighth executive president of Sri Lanka will be delved into in greater detail in the second part of this article.

(The writer can be reached at dbsjeyaraj@yahoo.com.)

Posted in Uncategorized

Estate owners’ challenge to Rs. 1,000 wage dismissed

The Court of Appeal yesterday (9) dismissed the petition filed by the Employers’ Federation of Ceylon (EFC) to revoke the decision taken by the Wages Board of the Department of Labour to increase the minimum daily wage of estate workers to Rs. 1,000.

Accordingly, the written application filed by the EFC in March 2021, requesting the court to quash the daily wage of Rs. 1,000 has been dismissed on the grounds that the Ministry of Labour has followed the proper procedures in instating the rule through the summoning of the Wages Board, said Commissioner General (CG) of Labour Prabath Chandrakeerthi, while speaking to The Morning yesterday.

“The appeal by the regional plantation companies (RPCs) to revoke the decision to pay plantation workers a minimum wage of Rs. 1,000 has been dismissed by the Court owing to the fact that the Department has followed the proper procedure in establishing the rule despite what the RPCs claimed,” said Chandrakeerthi.

Furthermore, he stated that this is applicable to only tea and rubber plantation workers, as determined before.

“This can be considered as a victory for the plantation workers in the country, in which the Department is delighted to have been of assistance,” he stated further.

Additionally, MP Jeevan Thondaman, who is attached to the Ceylon Workers’ Congress, also made a post on Twitter regarding the favourable verdict of the case, thanking the attorneys who appeared on behalf of the plantation workers.

“This is not a permanent solution. The RPCs must come to the table and discuss a collective agreement or an alternative wage model; if not we will be forced to go to the wages board demanding a fair daily wage for the workers. When we were criticised for the Rs. 1,000 not being given to the workers, the unions took the brunt of it. We remained silent as we did not want to comment on an ongoing case. After 17 long months, we have received a favourable verdict (sic),” he said.

Vicissitudes of India-Sri Lanka strategic relations By P.K.Balachandran

The current disturbance in India-Sri Lanka relations caused by the proposed docking of the sophisticated Chinese military survey vessel Yuan Wang 5 at Hambantota port is but the latest in a long series of hiccups in Indo-Lankan strategic relations.

The relationship has been seeing ups and downs since the two countries became independent in the 1940s. A factor characterizing the relationship is the difference in the strategic vision of the two countries. India has consistently believed that Sri Lanka is vital for its security in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR), and that the island must be within its political and defense perimeter. In contrast, Sri Lanka has consistently labored under fear of Indian domination or even absorption due to the asymmetry in power, physical proximity, historical links, and ethnic and religious commonalities.

While India has attempted to block the influence of powers thought to be inimical to it, Sri Lanka has cultivated India’s rivals to use them as a check on India’s dominance. The India-Sri Lanka spat over the proposed visit of Yuan Wang 5 to Hambantota stems from the contradiction between these two tendencies.

According to Punsara Amarasinghe, author of a paper entitled “Small State Dilemma” (Open Military Studies 2020), a Lankan leader had said that “the day Ceylon (Sri Lanka) dispensed with Englishmen completely, the island would go under India.” Lankans were disconcerted by Indian scholar-diplomat K.M Panikkar’s 1945 thesis that cooperation between India, Burma and Sri Lanka would be “a pre-requisite for a realistic policy of Indian defense.” He wrote: “The first and primary consideration is that both Burma and Ceylon must form with India a basic federation for mutual defense whether they will it or not. It is necessary for their own security.”

Additionally, according to Amarasinghe: “ Many Indian policymakers and strategists believed that the departure of British power from the Indian Ocean region had enthroned newly independent India as the natural successor to Britain as the guardian of the Indian Ocean.”

In the 1950s, Sri Lanka had declared “neutrality” as its foreign policy. But this was not adequate to appease New Delhi, Amarasinghe avers. An Indian Navy officer Ravi Kaul wrote in 1974: “Sri Lanka is as important strategically to India as Eire is to the United Kingdom or Taiwan to China. As long as Sri Lanka is friendly or neutral, India has nothing to worry about, but if there is any danger of this island falling under the domination of a power hostile to India, India cannot tolerate such a situation endangering her territorial integrity.” More recently, retired Indian National Security Advisor, Shivshankar Menon, described Sri Lanka as a “permanently-stationed aircraft carrier” off the Indian southern coast.

In 1963, Lankan Prime Minister Sirimavo Bandaranaike, touched raised the hackles in India when she signed a Maritime Agreement with China. This was a year after China invaded India. India feared that the Sino-Lankan agreement could acquire a military dimension at a time when India’s navy was still a Cinderella. In 1962-63 India expected Sirimavo to support India in its territorial dispute and war with China, but it was not forthcoming. Her only effort was to make them talk.

In 1971, when Sirimavo faced an attempt by the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) to seize power, India sent choppers to help the Lankan forces. But come December 1971, when India needed her support for the liberation war in Bangladesh, she gave refuelling facilities to Pakistan’s military aircraft. India was rubbed on the wrong side.

After Sri Lanka liberalized its economy in 1977-78, President J.R. Jayewardene joined the Western camp, while India’s relations with the US had soured because of the latter’s support for Pakistan in the Bangladesh liberation war in 1971. After the 1983 anti-Tamil riots in Colombo and the influx of Tamil refugees into Tamil Nadu, India began to back the Tamil militants.

But there was an Indian security/geopolitical dimension to the intervention also. Ex-Indian envoy in Colombo J.N.Dixit wrote: “It would be relevant to analyze India’s motivations and actions vis-à-vis Sri Lanka in the larger perspective of the international and regional strategic environment obtained between 1980 and 1984”. Amarasinghe quotes the then Minister of National Security, Lalith Athulathmudali, as saying: “India wanted to control her surroundings. They had an obsession that Trincomalee was being given as a base to the US.”

In mid-1987, India stopped the advance of the Sri Lankan army against the Tamil Tiger militants. It pressured Jayewardene to sign the India-Sri Lanka Accord in July 1987 and accept an Indian Peace Keeping Force (IPKF). The Accord made Sri Lanka bar forces inimical to India from using its ports and other facilities.

To get even with India, President R.Premadasa armed the Tamil Tigers to help them take on the IPKF. Later, he gave the IPKF an ultimatum to leave. A miffed India refused to give military aid to Colombo when it resumed fighting with the Tigers in June 1990. However, in the final stages of the war in 2007-2009, India helped Colombo defeat the LTTE. A “troika” of top security officials from Delhi and a “troika” from Colombo, facilitated the process.

But there was a change in the Delhi-Colombo security equation with China entering Sri Lanka as a big builder of infrastructure. Among the projects, the deep-water port in Hambantota raised the hackles in New Delhi. In 2010, Alok Kumar and Ishwaraya Balakrishnan said in a paper in the Indian Journal of Political Science: “The construction of this port will bring China within breathing distance of India’s southern coast where sensitive installations, including power plants, are present. It could also help China in keeping a track of India’s nuclear, space and naval establishments in South India and also serving as a listening post”.

India’s apprehensions onIy increased when, in 2017, the port was leased to China for 99 years.

In 2014, a Chinese nuclear submarine “Changzheng 2 had docked in Colombo almost coinciding with the visit of President Xi Jinping. New Delhi saw this as a case of Beijing cocking a snook at New Delhi with Colombo’s connivance. In Indian eyes, the docking violated the Indo-Sri Lanka Accord which stipulated that no port in Sri Lanka will be made available for military use by any country in a manner prejudicial to India’s interests.

But China also has security interests in the Indian Ocean, points out Amarasinghe. Zhao Nanqui, the director of the General Logistics Department of the People’s Liberation Army had said: “We can no longer accept the Indian Ocean as an ocean only for the Indians”. Zhang Ming, a Chinese naval analyst had warned that approximately 244 islands from Indian Nicobar and the Andaman archipelago could be used by India as a metal chain to hinder Chinese ships entering the Strait of Malacca.

When Gotabaya Rajapaksa came to power in 2019, Foreign Secretary Adm. Jayanath Colombage said: “We have to understand the importance of India in the region and we have to understand that Sri Lanka is very much in the maritime and the air security umbrellas of India. We need to benefit from that”.

Indian and Sri Lankan navies have conducted joint exercises nine times under the SLINEX series. Recently, India and Sri Lanka agreed to set up a joint Maritime Rescue Coordination Center (MRCC) with a US$ 6 million grant from India. Sri Lanka would also get a donation of a US$ 19.81 million worth 4,000-ton floating dock, a Dornier surveillance aircraft and a ship repair dock from India.

Sri Lanka became part of India’s Security and Growth for all in the Region (SAGAR) scheme. Maritime Domain Awareness (MDA) is part of SAGAR. But in the case of Yuan Wang 5, Sri Lanka had not shared with India, information about its coming. Hence India’s displeasure.

China ship heading to H’tota reduces speed, course remains unchanged

The Yuan Wang 5, a Chinese vessel used for tracking satellites and intercontinental ballistic missiles, remains in the Indian Ocean.

This is despite the Sri Lankan Ministry of Foreign Affairs confirming that it made a request to defer the visit of the Chinese vessel to Hambantota.

India had repeatedly voiced protest against the vessels arrival citing security concerns, and yesterday the Sri Lankan Ministry of Foreign Affairs said it requested China to defer the visit of the Yuan Wang 5. India also termed the vessel as a Chinese Spy Ship.

It is in this backdrop that Sri Lanka made a request from China to defer the visit of the vessel.

However, on Tuesday the vessel increased its speed and reached a point some 600 nautical miles away from the southern Sri Lankan port of Hambantota.

It is now reported that the vessel abruptly reduced its speed to 5 knots late last night, changing direction towards the Andaman Islands.

However, again this morning the Yuan Wang 5 changed back to its original course.

The vessel that can travel at speeds above any other standard vessel had reduced its speed to 4 Knots.

British woman asked to leave Sri Lanka before 15th August for posting Aragalaya Content

The Department of Immigration and Emigration has decided to terminate the VISA issue to British National Kayleigh Fraser, who posted Aragalaya protest content on Social Media.

In a letter, the Department of Immigration and Emigration had informed her to leave Sri Lanka before the 15th of August.

Earlier, The Department of Immigration and Emigration said that the passport of British National Kayleigh Fraser was seized because she had violated her visa conditions.

Kayleigh Fraser was informed to visit to the Immigration and Emigration Department within 07 days for an investigation.

Posted in Uncategorized

Japan halts 12 JAICA projects in Sri Lanka until IMF provides roadmap: minister

Japan has halted 12 projects under Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) in Sri Lanka until the International Monetary Fund (IMF) provides a roadmap to the crisis-hit island, a top minister said.

“Twelve projects funded by Japan under JICA will be suspended until the IMF establishes a roadmap on Sri Lanka’s debts and its sustainability because the country has been declared bankrupt,” Minister of Ports, Shipping and Aviation Nimal Siripala de Silva told parliament on Wednesday August 10.

Sri Lanka’s relations with Japan was tested in the last two years after former President Gotabaya Rajapaksa who was closer to China scrapped a JICA-funded light railway transit (LRT) project claiming it was too expensive and unilaterally cancelled a 500 million US dollars trilateral deal with India and Japan to develop the Eastern Container Terminal (ECT) of the Colombo Port.

The LRT project was a 1.5 billion US dollar soft-loan project that would have solved some of the traffic issues in the Malabe corridor.

Sri Lanka has recently been trying to rebuild relations with Japan who previously poured many millions of dollars in funds to the country.

Sri Lanka president orders immediate termination of Japan-funded light rail project

Sri Lanka cabinet cancels Japan funded light rail project

Japan firm claims damages of Rs5.8bn from Sri Lanka after LRT deal scrapped

Sri Lanka is facing its worst economic crisis in the post-independent era. Many countries have pledged help but said only they can do that once Sri Lanka ensures an IMF programme after renegotiations with its creditors.

Posted in Uncategorized

22nd constitutional amendment presented to parliament

The 22nd Amendment to the Constitution will be presented to the Parliament by Minister of Justice, Prisons Affairs and Constitutional Reforms Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe this morning (Aug 10).

Parliamentary session commenced at 10.00 a.m. today and will continue until 4.30 p.m.

The amendment, which had been referred to as the 21st Amendment so far, will in fact be the 22nd Amendment, as another draft 21st Amendment has already been gazetted.

The 21st Amendment to the Constitution is the constitutional amendment presented to the parliament by the main opposition Samagi Jana Balawegaya (SJB) in April as a private Bill. It was later published in the government gazette and challenged in the Supreme Court.

Dr. Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe, who was appointed the Minister of Justice, Prison Affairs & Constitutional Reforms, later presented a government Bill to the Cabinet of Ministers in his ministerial capacity, which is referred to as the 22nd amendment.

The Supreme Court, delivering its determination, ruled that the 21st amendment put forward by the SJB cannot proceed further without a public referendum.

In such a backdrop, the Cabinet of Ministers gave the approval to gazette the 22nd amendment presented by the Justice Minister.

Policy approval of the Cabinet of Ministers was given on June 20, 2022 for the preliminary draft for the 22nd amendment. The 22nd constitutional amendment bill was prepared by the legal Draftsman accordingly. The Attorney General had later informed that the bill is in accordance with the Constitution.

Consequently, the Cabinet of Ministers approved the proposal presented by the Minister of Justice, Prison Affairs and Constitutional Reforms, to publish the 22nd constitutional amendment Bill in the Government Gazette and thereafter present the same in Parliament for approval.

The constitutional amendment is expected to empower Parliament over the executive president and annul the 20A to the Constitution, which had given unfettered powers to President after abolishing the 19th Amendment.

Under the 22A, the President, the Cabinet of Ministers and the National Council will be held accountable to the Parliament. Fifteen Committees and Oversight Committees are also accountable to Parliament.

Posted in Uncategorized

Sri Lanka government asks Thailand to grant entry to former president Gotabaya Rajapaksa

The Sri Lankan government has made a request to Thailand for its former president Gotabaya Rajapaksa to enter the country, said Mr Tanee Sangrat, director general of Thailand’s Information Department, Foreign Affairs Ministry, on Wednesday (Aug 10).

“The Thai side received a request for the former president to enter Thailand from the current government of Sri Lanka. The consideration was based on longstanding and cordial ties between the two countries,” said Mr Tanee in a media statement.

His statement followed a report that Sri Lanka’s former president is expected to arrive in Thailand on Thursday. Mr Rajapaksa fled his country last month amid mass protests over Sri Lanka’s economic crisis.

He flew to the Maldives before arriving in Singapore on Jul 14. His short-term visit pass was then extended until Aug 11, CNA understands.

Singapore’s Foreign Affairs Minister Vivian Balakrishnan said that Mr Rajapaksa was “not accorded any privileges, immunity or hospitality”.

According to Mr Tanee, Mr Rajapaksa is not seeking political asylum in Thailand.

“The former president is able to enter Thailand without a visa for a period of 90 days, according to the 2013 Agreement on Visa Exemption between Thailand and Sri Lanka. The stay is temporary in nature with the aim of onward travel. No political asylum has been sought,” said Mr Tanee in the statement.

Sri Lanka defaulted on its US$51 billion foreign debt in mid-April. Its dwindling foreign currency has crippled the economy, disrupted imports and led to shortages of fuel, medicine and other essentials.

People in the country have been increasingly overwhelmed with the soaring cost of living and inflation jumped to a record 60.8 per cent in July.

After fleeing the country, Mr Rajapaksa submitted his resignation letter from Singapore. He was replaced by former prime minister Ranil Wickremesinghe last month.

Chinese social media platform bars a promotional campaign by SL

A Chinese social media platform has suspended a promotional campaign organized by the Sri Lankan embassy apparently in tit for tat for the government’s move to suspend the visit of the Chinese ship, a top source said.

The Sri Lankan authorities organized this campaign to be launched on Friday on ‘Douyin’. However, the Sri Lankan mission has been informed that it cannot be implemented.

The Sri Lankan authorities believe it has been in retaliation to Sri Lanka’s postponement of the port call of ‘Yuan Wang 5’ research ship following protests by India .

Also, a top source said many social media sites in China are hot with negative comments on Sri Lanka. It is also learned that some Chinese supermarkets have delayed the purchase of Sri Lankan goods.

Posted in Uncategorized

Packet of rice will reduce by 10% and plain tea will be Rs.30

The All-Island Canteen Owners’ Association says the price of a packet of rice will be reduced by 10 percent while a cup of plain tea will be sold for Rs.30 from today (9).

Speaking during a media briefing in Colombo today, Chairman of the Association Asela Sampath said the decision was taken following the announcement by Litro Gas Company pertaining to price reductions and the drop-in prices of vegetables and other goods.

Sampath said a cup of plain tea which was previously sold for Rs.40-50 must now be sold at Rs.30 while the 10 percent price reduction will apply to all rice packets above Rs.200.

The Chairman of the Association provided a telephone number to inform them of any restaurants not providing these reliefs adding they have to regulate themselves since there is no state institution to regulate these prices.

Sampath said the union will conduct discussions with the Consumer Affairs Authority and subject Ministers in order to reach a decision to impose a maximum price for a packet of rice, fried rice, kottu and hoppers.

He also called on poultry farmers to issue a control price to which they can provide eggs at and also urged biscuit companies to reduce prices of their products.